Welcome!

SOA & WOA Authors: Kevin Jackson, Maureen O'Gara, John Savageau, Greg Ness, Bruce Johnston

Related Topics: Java, SOA & WOA

Java: Article

Second Bidder Upsets Micro Focus-Borland Deal

If the Micro Focus deal falls through, Borland will have to pay Micro Focus $3 million
By Maureen O'Gara
Article Rating:
June 11, 2009 06:15 PM EDT
Reads:
 1,366

Although a vigilant press never sleeps, we confess we nodded off there for a moment and this almost got by us.

Last week while EMC was distracting everybody by one-upping NetApp in a hostile play for Data Domain, Micro Focus was saying sotto voce that a mystery company, described as a financial buyer, had trumped its $75 million cash offer for Borland.

Then in an SEC filing Borland said that “Company E” had sent it a letter on May 22, 16 days after its deal with Micro Focus was announced, conditionally offering $1.20 a share, 20% more than Micro Focus offered.

Borland said it signed an NDA with Company E and that “the indication of interest was reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal.”

Any Company E deal now awaits the results of its due diligence.

If the Micro Focus deal falls through, Borland will have to pay Micro Focus $3 million.

Published June 11, 2009 – Reads 1,366
Copyright © 2009 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.

More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.