| By Tilak Mitra, Norbert Bieberstein, Keith Jones, Robert Laird | Article Rating: |
|
| September 9, 2008 04:15 PM EDT | Reads: |
6,015 |
Service Oriented Modeling and Architecture (SOMA) is a modeling and design technique developed by IBM that provides prescriptive steps for how to enable target business processes by defining and developing a service-based IT solution. SOMA provides the communication link between the business requirements and the IT solution. It provides guidance on how to use business model and information as inputs to derive and define a service-based IT model. SOMA, as a methodology, addresses the gap between SOA and object orientation. This methodology approach provides modeling, analysis, design techniques, and activities to define the foundations of an SOA. It helps to define the elements in each of the SOA layers (see Figure 1) and also to take architectural decisions at each level.
At the heart of SOMA is the identification and specification of services, components, and process flows. At a high level, SOMA is a three-phased approach to identify, specify, and realize services, components, and flows (typically, choreography of services). The first phase is that of service identification, where various techniques are used to identify an exhaustive list of candidate services. The second phase is that of service specification, in which a detailed design of services and components is completed. The realization phase focuses on making architectural decisions, justifying the most prudent approach to implement the services.
SOMA focuses directly on the services, service components, and flows. These SOA constructs reside between Layer 2 and Layer 4 of the architecture stack. However, the activities performed as a part of the end-to-end methodology influence the placement of components in the other layers of the stack. Figure 2 illustrates the focus of SOMA as it pertains to the solution stack.
One of the main outputs of the SOMA method is a service model. It is recommended that a service model constitute of the following artifacts about services:
- Service portfolio: List of all the enterprise services
- Service hierarchy: A categorization of services into service groups
- Service exposure: An analysis and rationalization of which services should be exposed and which should not
- Service dependencies: Representing the dependencies of services on other services
- Service composition: How services take part in compositions to realize business process flows
- Service NFRs: The nonfunctional requirements that a service must comply with
- State management: The various types of states that a service should maintain and implement
- Realization decisions: Architectural decisions, for each service, around the most justified mechanism to implement the service
The techniques employed in the various phases of the method address one or more parts of the service model. Although there may be other work products that can be developed by exercising the various phases and activities of this method, we concentrate on the service model in this excerpt.
Published September 9, 2008 Reads 6,015
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Tilak Mitra
Tilak Mitra is a Certified Senior IT Architect at IBM. He specializes in mid- to large-range enterprise and application architectures based on J2EE, MQ, and other EAI technologies. You can reach him at tmitra@us.ibm.com.
More Stories By Norbert Bieberstein
Norbert Bieberstein, solution architect for IBM's Enterprise Integration team, has extensive first-hand experience with customers migrating to SOA-based On-Demand solutions.
More Stories By Keith Jones
Keith Jones, PhD, IT architect at IBM Enterprise Integration Solutions, focuses on helping customers define and implement service-oriented architectures.
More Stories By Robert Laird
Robert Laird is an IT architect in IBM's SOA Advanced Technologies group.
- Big Data in Telecom: The Need for Analytics
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- Microsoft Tries Hadoop on Azure
- Amazon to Fix Some Kindle Fire Problems
- What Motivates Open Standards in the Cloud?
- What to Expect in 2012: Cloud Computing and Open Source Software
- Will PaaS Finally Bring Open Source Love to the Enterprise?
- Ten Hot Trends in Cloud Data for 2012
- Oracle Disaster Recovery Site Hosted by Amazon Cloud
- Cross-Platform Mobile Website Development – a Tool Comparison
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- The Future of Cloud Computing: Industry Predictions for 2012
- Make Customer On-Boarding Easy as Paint-by-Numbers for Cloud Services
- Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies 2011
- Book Excerpt: Introducing HTML5
- Adobe Sends Flex to the Apache Foundation
- Big Data in Telecom: The Need for Analytics
- Book Excerpt: Java Application Profiling Tips and Tricks
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- Patterns for Building High Performance Applications
- Microsoft Tries Hadoop on Azure
- The Next Web Architecture
- Cloud Computing: A Comparison of Computing Models
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- The Top 150 Players in Cloud Computing
- Who Are The All-Time Heroes of i-Technology?
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Get the Message
- ESB Myth Busters: 10 Enterprise Service Bus Myths Debunked
- i-Technology Viewpoint: Is Web 2.0 the Global SOA?
- i-Technology Viewpoint: Thinking Outside the VC Box
- i-Technology Viewpoint: When to Leave Your First IT Job
- SOA Web Services Edge Conference Coverage on SYS-CON.TV
- SYS-CON.TV's "SOA Web Services" and "Enterprise Open Source" Programs To Air in December
- Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters

















