Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Dalibor Siroky, Elizabeth White, Pat Romanski, John Katrick, Liz McMillan

Related Topics: Java IoT, Microservices Expo, Linux Containers, Eclipse

Java IoT: Article

The i-Technology Right Stuff

Searching for the Twenty Top Software People in the World

 

Adam Bosworth

 

Brief Description: Famous for Quattro Pro, Microsoft Access, and IE4; then BEA, now Google

Further Details:

Possessed of one of the foremost minds in modern i-technology, Adam Bosworth was an XML guru for Microsoft Corporation, where he was a general manager in the late 90s, after which he left MS to found Crossgain - a company subsequently bought by BEA Systems.

Interviewed by SYS-CON when he was vice president of engineering of the Frameworks Division at BEA, Bosworth revealed what drives him. "I've spent my life trying to make building applications easy," he said, adding that what attracts him about i-technology is, basically, helping developers build solutions - "developing products, plumbing, or technology to help them build solutions."

He continued: "Whether it was Active Server Pages and the extent of my work at Microsoft, all of which was plumbing, or Access and working on the VB products, I helped them build the application. That's what I like doing."

Bosworth's last activity for BEA involved its mobile "Alchemy" project, which he unveiled personally at the company's 2004 eWorld conference.

He is now one of Google Inc's highest profile new recruits, along with Joshua Bloch.

Other SYS-CON stories about Adam Bosworth:

Bosworth Bails Out, Leaves BEA Systems for Google, Inc.

Adam Bosworth on the "Mom Factor" in Web Services

A Conversation with Adam Bosworth

More Stories By Jeremy Geelan

Jeremy Geelan is Chairman & CEO of the 21st Century Internet Group, Inc. and an Executive Academy Member of the International Academy of Digital Arts & Sciences. Formerly he was President & COO at Cloud Expo, Inc. and Conference Chair of the worldwide Cloud Expo series. He appears regularly at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences across six continents. You can follow him on twitter: @jg21.

Comments (152) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Rev Aaron 12/11/04 05:26:55 PM EST

No Alan Kay?! Half of the folks here wouldn't achieved what they had if it weren't for the work that Alan Kay and his partners at Xerox PARC had done. It has nothing to do with how much you like Smalltalk- it's still the base for so much of modern programming. You may not like to use a GUI, but the work they did- the invention of the GUI- has been incredibly important. Helluvan oversight.

Industry Perspective 12/11/04 05:26:05 PM EST

If the list is from an Industry perspective (it seems to be a mixed biased perspective) it should include:

OS/390 creators, particularily Fred Brooks for changing the way we think about software development

Bill Gates for revolutionizing the industry and achieving world dominance while beating giant IBM into submission, he also had a bit to do with webapps

Alan Kay and team for having all the good ideas

Steve Jobs for bringing good ideas into the software realm (mouse, GUIs)

The VisiCalc dude for the first killer app

John Carmack for the first killer app video game (killer in more than one sense) and changed, revived the video game landscape

The inventor of Pong

The inventor of the RDBMS

Mark Andressen for Netscape (which changed the software world as we know it)

Linus Torvalds for Linux

Richard Stallman for GNU and its influence on the way software is built today

The creators of EJB for creating a standardized appserver companies could go for

Of course my list is industry oriented, not development oriented. For a development oriented approach I'd include:

Fred Brooks for contributions to Software Engineering

Alan Kay for OO

Pascal creator for popularizing structured programming

C creator for popularizing high level languages

Lisp creator for functional programming

Booch for UML and stuff

XP people for XP

RDBMS creator for the most successful storage mechanism to date

Martin Fowler for refactoring book

Gang of Four for Design Patterns

James Gosling for finally bringing OO to the masses (no such credit for C++ creator)

Steve Jobs for GUI programming for industry ...

isj 12/11/04 05:09:31 PM EST

It seems that the list favors practitioners and not those who researched the theories. I am missing Codd, Dijkstra and deMarco.

dpilot 12/11/04 04:54:16 PM EST

Randy Waterhouse invented one of the early computers, complete with accoustic delay lines.

Snort 12/11/04 04:09:34 PM EST

How about Martin Roesch whose software became the industry standard for network-intrusion detection? He wrote an open-source program in 1998 called Snort designed to examine data traffic coursing over a network and sound an alarm if hackers are trying to break in. Snort quickly became popular among computer-security geeks and in 2001 he turned it into a commercial venture, Sourcefire, which is now worth $100 million.

Duhavid 12/11/04 03:15:24 PM EST

Lee Brody wrote:
All you assholes are basically working in the computer industry because of him and a few other pioneers that saw the writing on the wall back in the late 70's.

What tripe! There was a computer industry *before* Bill Gates. If he hadnt come along things would be *better*, not worse. He is the biggest stifler of innovation around, bar none. Try this on, think of a great software idea, a modestly big one. Now imagine you need to go get funding. First question? How are you going to keep Microsoft from taking the market from you with a simple marketing campaign stating they are going to produce what you are? And how many companies have gone out of business because of Microsoft?

Isn't is amazing how success breeds contempt! Talk about the continuing 'dumbing down' of America!

No, success is not the issue here. Ethics, specifically the lack thereof are. The thing that is dumb is that he gets public support for breaking the law. In my book, as a businessman, Bill Gates belongs in bottom 20 list. As a programmer, I dont know, I dont agree with the poster that thought he was "brilliant", all machines of that day where constrained, he was probably average for that time.

ron 12/11/04 03:03:20 PM EST

The nice thing about the article is that it's not just a list of 40 software greats, it has a biography for each one.

One other note, if SYS-CON is going to (rightly) include Bill Joy, Tim O'Reilly, and Ann Winblad, then you've got to include Steve Jobs and/or Steve Wozniak.

Wendy 12/11/04 02:45:13 PM EST

Larry Wall, inventor of Perl. Large parts of internet work because Perl takes care of them. If Guido van Rossem, creator of Python, is on your list, than Larry Wall should be on it as well! Darn! I'm not voting untill Larry Wall is on that list.

Yes Gosling 12/11/04 02:32:37 PM EST

Honestly, what the hell did Torvalds even do? Took minux, rewrote it from scratch, and started passing off the result as the next great silver bullet

I sound like a moron don't I?

C-sharpshooter 12/11/04 02:29:00 PM EST

>>> Honestly, what the hell did Gosling even do?

Well for one thing he isn;t just the Father of Java, he's also the Father of C# - and that guy Anders from Microsoft is just the kidnapper of the child!

Gosling??!! 12/11/04 02:26:59 PM EST

Kay definitely deserves mention if Gosling does. Honestly, what the hell did Gosling even do? Took C++, removed a bunch of shit from it, added garbage collection, and started passing off the result as the next great silver bullet.

Update2 12/11/04 02:13:17 PM EST

here's a further update on the current top 10 rankings:

1 217 Torvalds
2 174 Turing
3 159 Stallman
4 157 Ritchie
5 139 Berners-Lee
6 114 Thompson
7 89 Stroustrup
8 75 Joy
9 77 Van Rossum
10 72 Kernighan

gaming software developers 12/11/04 02:07:13 PM EST

Who'd be on your equivalent list for games? I'd definitely have Peter Molyneux, John Carmack, Chris Crawford and Mike Burnham...

ratboot 12/11/04 02:04:24 PM EST

Where are the GUI people? Without them, forget Windows, Mac OS X, KDE, Gnome, etc.

- Douglas Engelbart, for the mouse and many other widgets
- Alan Kay, for Smalltalk (one of the 1st OOP) and the modern GUI (icons, etc.)
- Steve Jobs, for System 1.0 (Mac OS 1), NextStep and Mac OS X
- Bill Gates, for BASIC and Windows

where's DJB? 12/11/04 02:01:05 PM EST

Where's D. J. Bernstein (DJB), who wrote Qmail by as a replacement for Sendmail?

mark 12/11/04 01:47:04 PM EST

The people in my top twenty don't make a name for themselves by popularizing derivative works. They synthesize, innovate, are involved in many aspects of their "product" and followup on their work

Larry Wall: Perl, design of computer programming languages using principles of linguists, ...

Stephen Wolfram: Mathematica, ...

these pioneers don't continue to improve some of their "products":

Don Knuth: TeX, literate programming, METAFONT, TOACP, ...

Ted Nelson: Xanadu (precursor to WWW), ...

I'm waiting on the semantic wob to see if Berners-Lee
makes the list.

Mr. Reality 12/11/04 01:37:26 PM EST

How did "Nathan Myrhvold" get on this list?

Kristopher 12/11/04 01:36:54 PM EST

I believe DJB should be added to the list. In 20 years he has revamped the way a lot of us look at computer security. Plus he wrote some useful stuff like qmail, tinydns, etc.

Matt 12/11/04 12:54:00 PM EST

I also consider Don Knuth to be a glaring omission. Claims that he didn't actually build any major systems are ludicrous -- TeX by itself played an extremely important role in the development of machine-independent markup, publishing, open source, yada yada yada.

Perl Hacker 12/11/04 12:41:01 PM EST

Gurusamy Sarathy, Perl 5 pumpkin and the force behind bringing Perl to Windows belongs on this list!

electro 12/11/04 12:23:14 PM EST

Actually Knuth really is the father of wordprocessing, as most if not all took algorithyms out of Tex to use in their own wordprocessing programs.

Not to mention he is also the father of codifying algorythm research.

sangudu 12/11/04 12:22:10 PM EST

I agree. Knuth is the worlds best programmer ever and creator
of TeX and metafont systems in which most of
academic publications are done.
His works have taugth todays software engineers
algorithms data structures and algorithm analysis.
Bad that he missed out.

Sellam Ismail 12/11/04 12:21:34 PM EST

If you are a moron like me and put your real e-mail address in the editing form and are now getting inundated with pointless alerts whenever a new message gets posted, you'll notice that the "removal" URLs are completely bogus. Here's the actual URL you should use:

http://www.linuxworld.com/features/remove.htm?re=sellam%40vintage%2Eorg

But of course you should replace the part after "re=" with your own e-mail address.

Knuth Missing! 12/11/04 12:19:30 PM EST

What an appalling list, heavily biased to the fashionably recent. Sergei Brin may be clever, but he hasn't contributed a tenth of what Don Knuth has, who isn't even on the list.

There are also complete fields that have been ignored, what about the founding gods of Graphics? Scientific programming? Logic programming? AI?

Parzival52 12/11/04 12:19:22 PM EST

How could John Backus? He led the team that created FORTRAN and the first compiler (for FORTRAN), proving that machine-generated code could compete with hand-assembled code.

How could you omit Donald Knuth? He wrote the Bible on algorithms.

Lastly, no list would be complete without John McCarthy, who with his graduate students, created Lisp (LISP?), the antipode to assembly/FORTRAN/C, and a language that the others have been slowly moving towards ever since (Thank you, Paul Graham).

As usual, our historical timeline is only about twenty years long.

an early WebLogic customer 12/11/04 12:15:25 PM EST

You included Don Furgueson, but left out Bob Pasker, the founder of WebLogic, who wrote and invented the first Java Application Server and actually invented J2EE.

Update 12/11/04 12:14:05 PM EST

here's an update on the current top 10 rankings:

1 169 Torvalds
2 135 Turing
3 121 Stallman
4 119 Ritchie
5 115 Berners-Lee
6 92 Thompson
7 69 Stroustrup
8 61 Van Rossum
9 60 Kernighan
10 49 Oreilly

Ramki 12/11/04 12:13:18 PM EST

Larry Wall deserves more than a nomination. If we talk about REAL software that works on REAL life situations, to help REAL people, that is.

rn, patch and perl. There is not a single major software construction team in the world that has not benefited from
atleast one of these tools.

perl has singlehandedly been responsible for the "CGI" web
revolution that presaged the current internet web programming models.

Tim Bray 12/11/04 12:11:02 PM EST

This idea is moronic and has nothing to do with me and they shouldn't be using my name in the headline. -Tim Bray

4 More Additions 12/11/04 12:06:34 PM EST

Peter Pagé - Developed Software AGs Natural, pioneered 4GLS (1979)

John Postley - Developed Mark IV (1967), the first million dollar software product, for Informatics

Larry Constantine - Invented data flow diagrams, presented first paper on concepts of structured design in 1968

Bob Bemer - One of the developers of COBOL and the ASCII naming standard for IBM (1960s)

Dr. Jean Ichbiah - Principal designer, Ada language (1977)

murr 12/11/04 11:55:39 AM EST

Another notable omission: Niklaus Wirth, designer of Pascal, Modula-2, and Oberon (to name only his most influential languages), author of "Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs".

Here's who invented sQL 12/11/04 11:53:31 AM EST

The basis for SQL can be traced down to Dr. Edgar Frank Codd (called
"Ted") (1924-2003), a mathematician from Oxford (UK), and the
inventor of relational databases, while working as an IBM researcher in
the IBM San Jose Research Laboratory (USA).

In June 1970 he published an article called
'A relational model of data for large shared data banks',
which appeared in the ACM (=Association for Computing Machinery)
magazine, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 377-387

Sellam Ismail 12/11/04 11:53:10 AM EST

HOW DO YOU GET REMOVED FROM THIS FUCKING RETARDED FEEDBACK FORUM? I get an e-mail alert everytime someone posts a message, each including UTTERLY FUCKING USELESS links for removing myself from the alerts.

After I get through educating the morons that came up with this list, I'd like to send them to remedial web development classes.

I guess that serves me right for putting my real fucking e-mail address.

success!=XML 12/11/04 11:52:08 AM EST

>> I'd currently put both Tim Bray and Guido van Rossum
<>>>(and perhaps Linus Torvalds) on your second list,
<>>> but I'd seriously expect them to move to the first <>>>over the next 5-10 years.

I doubt it (Bray that is). XML has done the industry more harm than good. What we need is a list of software "ogres" - Bray, Gates, Wall etc. And whoever invented SQL.

julesh 12/11/04 11:50:48 AM EST

Agreed. Although over time people with currently-hyped projects may pass over onto the first list, rather than drop off the second list. E.g., I'd currently put both Tim Bray and Guido van Rossum (and perhaps Linus Torvalds) on your second list, but I'd seriously expect them to move to the first over the next 5-10 years.

finnw 12/11/04 11:49:27 AM EST

Maybe the list should be split into two parts.

1. Early pioneers (Turing etc), and possibly designers of the languages (C etc) that have stood the test of time.

This list will probably be roughly the same this time next year.

2. Inventors of recent, fashionable languages & technologies (better not mention them by name though)

This list will probably look very different this time next year.

Miguel? 12/11/04 11:44:53 AM EST

>>attempted to bring the worst features of windows<>
>>to linux

That is not at all fair to de Icaza. Sure, .NET is crap, but until there's an equivalent available on Linux, there will be a lot of resistence to replacing MS windoze in many applications. It's just like WINE, or any other emulator or compatibility library.

Bah 12/11/04 11:43:20 AM EST

The list is mostly of "computer pop artists". Where's McCarthy? (discoverer of lisp, the single most influential language in computing). Where's Pierce and Cardelli? Where's Church? How can you have Turing but not Church? That's stupid. It's not called the Church-Turing thesis for nothing, you know.

WTF is a shyster like de Icaza (attempted to bring the worst features of windows to linux) doing on a list with Mitch Kapor (discovered the spreadsheet)?

BillJ 12/11/04 11:34:35 AM EST

>Unbelievable that the inventor of Flash is included but
>>none, that I can see, from the CSRG at Berkeley that
>>designed and implemented TCP/IP, BSD etc. This list is
>>just an expression of personal preferences rather than
>>merits.

Bill Joy is on the list; he counts, doesn't he?

Jim S 12/11/04 11:32:51 AM EST

This list will lack all credibility if the name of Rear Admiral Grace Hopper is absent. Never mind COBOL! She invented the compiler!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper

ChTh 12/11/04 11:30:25 AM EST

Unbelievable that the inventor of Flash is included but none, that I can see, from the CSRG at Berkeley that designed and implemented TCP/IP, BSD etc. This list is just an expression of personal preferences rather than merits.

jon crowcroft 12/11/04 11:29:13 AM EST

whoever creates a perfect anti-spam technology

GnuVince 12/11/04 11:25:57 AM EST

Where is Alan Kay? Inventor of Smalltalk, the reference in terms of object-oriented languages, the inventor of overlapping windows, he worked on so many projects, visionner of the laptop computer, it's not even funny: ARPA, Ethernet, the laser printer, client/server networks, etc.

I think Mr. Kay should positively be on that list. Where would all the Java, C# and C++ people be without Smalltalk?

Sellam Ismail 12/11/04 11:25:54 AM EST

This is complete nerd masturbation. The entire list is indicative of a total lack of knowledge of the history of software. It represents mainly contemporaneous candidates (i.e. within the last 15 years) some of which don't even fit the bill as "software people". Out of the 40 candidates proposed, I see only about 7 that are a solid "yes", about 10 that are a "maybe" and the rest a definite "no".

I'd like to talk to whomever came up with this list and give them a long history lesson.

cait56 12/11/04 11:21:41 AM EST

The list is horribly tilted towards PC applications.
It does not deal with the important roles of networking, embedded computing or methodology except in token ways.
For example, including Booch as the sole methodologist is absurd. What about Dijkstra? Wirth? Yourdon? Mellor?

The relational database and thrid normalized form also seem to be totally overlooked, even though they made the entire IT industry possible. How about Date?

Then there's networking itself. Where's Jon Postel?

It also favors originators over evolvers. K&R created a cute little macro-assembler for PDP-11s called "C". But Plauger had amore to do with its evoluation into ANSI C, the truly usable portable language with well documented and defined standard libraries.

The way you really form a list like this is you gather a much larger list of top software developers, and fight out who influenced *them*.

tkittle 12/11/04 11:17:08 AM EST

For your convenience here is a sorted list of people according to the votes they have gotten so far:

  1 151 Torvalds
  2 120 Turing
  3 105 Stallman
  4 101 Ritchie
  5 101 Berners-Lee
  6 78 Thompson
  7 60 Stroustrup
  8 52 Kernighan
  9 47 Rossum
10 45 Oreilly
11 42 Joy
12 41 Hejlsberg
13 39 Gay
14 33 Fielding
15 30 Tanenbaum
16 30 Gosling
17 29 Booch
18 28 Pike
19 27 Brin
20 25 Cutler
21 23 Bricklin
22 19 Knopper
23 19 Fowler
24 18 Icaza
25 17 Bosworth
26 15 McClannahan
27 15 Frankston
28 14 Kapor
29 14 Bloch
30 12 Ferguson
31 12 Bray
32 8 Brand
33 6 Box
34 5 Patrick
35 5 Kertzman
36 5 Hillis
37 4 Winblad
38 4 Myhrvold
39 3 Paoli
40 2 Brilliant

oliverthered 12/11/04 11:03:25 AM EST

Adam Bosworth!!!!!!

>>Famous for Quattro Pro, Microsoft Access, and IE4;
>>then BEA, now Google

So that's who I have to blame. I hope google's a bit more solid.

grant 12/11/04 11:00:06 AM EST

Seriously, how can you elide Knuth?
He directly advised the advisors of
several names on this list and indirectly
thousands more through "The Art of.." series.

troll? 12/11/04 10:59:04 AM EST

it's worth including [Dijkstra] not just for his contributions to the development of compilers but also for his wonderful contrarian comments, like this one about OO: "Object-oriented programming is an exceptionally bad idea which could only have originated in California."

I'd be careful if I were you, California is just waking up and reading this!!!

An00n 12/11/04 10:55:26 AM EST

The "inventor" of C# ?!?!?!? WTF?A knock-off clone designed to kill a competitor just to ensure vendor lock-in?

Talk about low standards. Why not go straight to the top of Microsoft and just put Bill Gates on the list? Gates's business model of "make crappy software ubiquitous and charge lots of money for it" sure has had more of an effect on the world of software than some toady he selected to help him kill Java.

@MicroservicesExpo Stories
The nature of test environments is inherently temporary—you set up an environment, run through an automated test suite, and then tear down the environment. If you can reduce the cycle time for this process down to hours or minutes, then you may be able to cut your test environment budgets considerably. The impact of cloud adoption on test environments is a valuable advancement in both cost savings and agility. The on-demand model takes advantage of public cloud APIs requiring only payment for t...
"Codigm is based on the cloud and we are here to explore marketing opportunities in America. Our mission is to make an ecosystem of the SW environment that anyone can understand, learn, teach, and develop the SW on the cloud," explained Sung Tae Ryu, CEO of Codigm, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
High-velocity engineering teams are applying not only continuous delivery processes, but also lessons in experimentation from established leaders like Amazon, Netflix, and Facebook. These companies have made experimentation a foundation for their release processes, allowing them to try out major feature releases and redesigns within smaller groups before making them broadly available. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Lucas, Senior Staff Engineer at Optimizely, discussed how by using ne...
Many enterprise and government IT organizations are realizing the benefits of cloud computing by extending IT delivery and management processes across private and public cloud services. But they are often challenged with balancing the need for centralized cloud governance without stifling user-driven innovation. This strategy requires an approach that fundamentally reshapes how IT is delivered today, shifting the focus from infrastructure to services aggregation, and mixing and matching the bes...
"CA has been doing a lot of things in the area of DevOps. Now we have a complete set of tool sets in order to enable customers to go all the way from planning to development to testing down to release into the operations," explained Aruna Ravichandran, Vice President of Global Marketing and Strategy at CA Technologies, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
While we understand Agile as a means to accelerate innovation, manage uncertainty and cope with ambiguity, many are inclined to think that it conflicts with the objectives of traditional engineering projects, such as building a highway, skyscraper or power plant. These are plan-driven and predictive projects that seek to avoid any uncertainty. This type of thinking, however, is short-sighted. Agile approaches are valuable in controlling uncertainty because they constrain the complexity that ste...
Cavirin Systems has just announced C2, a SaaS offering designed to bring continuous security assessment and remediation to hybrid environments, containers, and data centers. Cavirin C2 is deployed within Amazon Web Services (AWS) and features a flexible licensing model for easy scalability and clear pay-as-you-go pricing. Although native to AWS, it also supports assessment and remediation of virtual or container instances within Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), or on-premise. By dr...
"This all sounds great. But it's just not realistic." This is what a group of five senior IT executives told me during a workshop I held not long ago. We were working through an exercise on the organizational characteristics necessary to successfully execute a digital transformation, and the group was doing their ‘readout.' The executives loved everything we discussed and agreed that if such an environment existed, it would make transformation much easier. They just didn't believe it was reali...
"We're developing a software that is based on the cloud environment and we are providing those services to corporations and the general public," explained Seungmin Kim, CEO/CTO of SM Systems Inc., in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
It’s “time to move on from DevOps and continuous delivery.” This was the provocative title of a recent article in ZDNet, in which Kelsey Hightower, staff developer advocate at Google Cloud Platform, suggested that “software shops should have put these concepts into action years ago.” Reading articles like this or listening to talks at most DevOps conferences might make you think that we’re entering a post-DevOps world. But vast numbers of organizations still struggle to start and drive transfo...
Agile has finally jumped the technology shark, expanding outside the software world. Enterprises are now increasingly adopting Agile practices across their organizations in order to successfully navigate the disruptive waters that threaten to drown them. In our quest for establishing change as a core competency in our organizations, this business-centric notion of Agile is an essential component of Agile Digital Transformation. In the years since the publication of the Agile Manifesto, the conn...
The cloud revolution in enterprises has very clearly crossed the phase of proof-of-concepts into a truly mainstream adoption. One of most popular enterprise-wide initiatives currently going on are “cloud migration” programs of some kind or another. Finding business value for these programs is not hard to fathom – they include hyperelasticity in infrastructure consumption, subscription based models, and agility derived from rapid speed of deployment of applications. These factors will continue to...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
Let's do a visualization exercise. Imagine it's December 31, 2018, and you're ringing in the New Year with your friends and family. You think back on everything that you accomplished in the last year: your company's revenue is through the roof thanks to the success of your product, and you were promoted to Lead Developer. 2019 is poised to be an even bigger year for your company because you have the tools and insight to scale as quickly as demand requires. You're a happy human, and it's not just...
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...
DevOps teams have more on their plate than ever. As infrastructure needs grow, so does the time required to ensure that everything's running smoothly. This makes automation crucial - especially in the server and network monitoring world. Server monitoring tools can save teams time by automating server management and providing real-time performance updates. As budgets reset for the New Year, there is no better time to implement a new server monitoring tool (or re-evaluate your current solution)....
We just came off of a review of a product that handles both containers and virtual machines in the same interface. Under the covers, implementation of containers defaults to LXC, though recently Docker support was added. When reading online, or searching for information, increasingly we see “Container Management” products listed as competitors to Docker, when in reality things like Rocket, LXC/LXD, and Virtualization are Dockers competitors. After doing some looking around, we have decided tha...
"Opsani helps the enterprise adopt containers, help them move their infrastructure into this modern world of DevOps, accelerate the delivery of new features into production, and really get them going on the container path," explained Ross Schibler, CEO of Opsani, and Peter Nickolov, CTO of Opsani, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The benefits of automation are well documented; it increases productivity, cuts cost and minimizes errors. It eliminates repetitive manual tasks, freeing us up to be more innovative. By that logic, surely, we should automate everything possible, right? So, is attempting to automate everything a sensible - even feasible - goal? In a word: no. Consider this your short guide as to what to automate and what not to automate.
identify the sources of event storms and performance anomalies will require automated, real-time root-cause analysis. I think Enterprise Management Associates said it well: “The data and metrics collected at instrumentation points across the application ecosystem are essential to performance monitoring and root cause analysis. However, analytics capable of transforming data and metrics into an application-focused report or dashboards are what separates actual application monitoring from relat...