Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Stackify Blog, Aruna Ravichandran, Dalibor Siroky, Kevin Jackson, PagerDuty Blog

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Article

Data Services for Next-Generation SOAs

A shared data layer can meet a critical business need

This article discusses the advantages of implementing shared "data services" to deliver on the true promise of service-oriented architectures - rapid application development through reusable components without sacrificing fast, accurate enterprise data access.

With a shared data layer, you can avoid integrity, performance, scalability, and availability issues that might otherwise occur.

We have entered an exciting period in the evolution of enterprise system design. More than ever, standards influence the way architects define and plan new projects. The component approach to development focuses on building blocks and provides a structure for solving complex problems. Sophisticated development tools relieve engineers of "nuts and bolts" work and allow them to concentrate more on business requirements.

I've had the opportunity to work closely with our customers as they transition into component-based technologies such as Web services and service-oriented architectures (SOAs). Their experiences highlight the importance of planning ahead for an efficient and robust data access strategy.

Because data access is such a basic requirement for enterprise development, the tendency is to pick standards such as Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB). The underlying data access may be performed with ADO, JDBC, or ODBC APIs, but it is common to leave the responsibility for database performance with database administrators. However, moving to a new architecture often means exponential growth in the demands placed on the data infrastructure - demands for increased volume and data integrity that cannot be solved in the database layer alone.

Data Access Challenges
Data access logic consumes a high percentage of development resources and plays a significant role in the success or failure of a development project. An R.B. Webber study concluded that coding and configuring object/relational (O-R) data access typically accounts for 30-40% of total project effort. Ultimately, data access logic often determines whether the resulting systems meet performance and scalability requirements.

The typical implementation of a component-based architecture makes each functional component responsible for its own data access logic. In the September 2004 issue of WSJ (Vol. 4, issue 9), Dr. Adam Kolawa confirmed this in his article's definition of application logic:

Application logic (or business logic): Handles requests from customers and agents, makes necessary connection to the database, and returns responses to customers and agents.

This is a concise description of the common architecture illustrated in Figure 1. In such systems, a request to the order application might require a database lookup of a price. In separate billing and shipping transactions, each of those applications again make their own database request. This architecture poses problems in three different areas:

  1. The team writing each application implements similar, but slightly different, data access logic. Even when the data access is standards based, this low-level coding is tedious, error prone, and inefficient. The costs multiply when you add redundant testing and maintenance over an application's life cycle.
  2. Requests that require database access are expensive. Each application's performance degrades when more requests come in than can be handled by the number of database connections available.
  3. This architecture often gives more individuals access to data, opening the floodgates and creating even greater demands on the database. Every application handles its own data access, even when they need the same data. Databases are an expensive and finite resource. You don't want critical business functions waiting on a queue to update the database while less important requests clog the network.
As shown in Figure 2, by separating the data access out of the application logic, you can avoid these problems. These shared "data services" reduce the number of database connections required and support a stateful architecture. By caching frequently requested data, more requests can be satisfied without querying the database, which improves performance and increases scalability and reliability. (It should be noted that the effectivesss of caching varies across systems, but that your typical CRUD application will benefit nicely.) In addition, the reusability and flexibility of data services allows new services to be developed and rolled out more quickly.

However, most enterprise systems are much more complex than this example, and data integrity can become a concern. Traditional applications often have their own database "silo," which contains a copy of business reference data such as customer information, product information, and inventory levels. Typically, each database is synchronized only once a day, so each application operates with slightly different data. When applications are redistributed as enterprise services without integrating the data silos, these data inconsistencies can create unanticipated business errors.

Figure 3 illustrates the inconsistencies that can arise when silo applications are exposed as services, each with different inventory data. In this example, the "show_status" service thinks the inventory level is 27, while the "check_ avail" service thinks the inventory level is 0.

Shared Data Services Enable SOA Success
An increasing number of enterprises recognize the need for a shared data service that offers domain-specific data classes used by multiple applications. Each application might use only a subset of the data classes managed by the data service. The data service manages relationships between the data classes and serves data changes to each application, regardless of the source of change.

Using the SOA paradigm, it is preferable to implement a credit card authorization, for example, as a single service that can be reused by many applications. Similarly, it is preferable to implement a single customer data service to retrieve current customer information for a set of related applications.

To be successful, an SOA initiative requires data access infrastructure software specifically designed to provide consistent performance and highly available data across distributed computing environments. Ideally, system architects should seek cross-platform data access products that are capable of meeting requirements across the project life cycle - from development through tuning and deployment.

From our customers' experience we've found that many organizations implement Web services or an SOA without realizing how this can increase the load on their back-end database and result in data bottlenecks. There are really three main concerns: performance, scalability, and data integrity. High-volume, complex systems require careful design of their data access to be successful.

Case Study: An SOA in Financial Services
A leading financial services firm implemented more than 40 equity trading applications on top of a shared data services layer. With rigorous requirements for reliability, performance, and scalability - up to $7 billion per day in trades and thousands of transactions per second at peak volume - they gave careful consideration to data access.

In equity trading, a single data consistency error can result in business-breaking consequences. They expected their shared data services layer to protect data integrity, deliver immediate response to end users, have the ability to scale to meet the growing needs of their businesses, and finally, to ensure 24x7 availability.

In their architecture, the data service layer provides caching, optimized updates, distributed cache synchronization, load balancing, failover, and client notification. These capabilities are far more robust than the homegrown data persistence layer used in previous generation of applications.

Figure 4 illustrates the structure of this SOA deployment. The data services layer provides data management for relational data and real-time market data feeds. Because the applications are related and share a common data model and common data, data services deliver up-to-date business information to each server and application.

The economic benefits that they realized include:

  • Doubled developer productivity: Shared functional and data services account for more than 50% of new application functionality
  • Tripled maintenance productivity: Systems deployed using SOA can be maintained with 75% fewer resources
  • Dramatically higher availability: Fault tolerance within the data services layer eliminates application failures due to intermittent database or network failures
  • Significant infrastructure and operational savings: Distributed application deployment with centralized data storage can achieve 40% capital cost savings and 30% annual operating cost savings over traditional data centers
Conclusion
Handling data access and updates accounts for the lion's share of enterprise application development efforts. Most IT groups today use ad hoc data access solutions, such as ADO.NET, that work well within a silo architecture but are unable to support data consistency enterprise wide. A shared data layer can meet critical business needs while supplying consistent data across all applications. When designed and implemented with the appropriate development tools, a shared data layer delivers the following benefits:
  • Increases developer productivity by allowing developers to focus more on business-critical logic
  • Maintains data integrity when migrating existing data and application silos to enterprise services
  • Ensures the performance and scalability of the deployed system

More Stories By Christopher Keene

Christopher Keene is Chairman and CEO of WaveMaker (formerly ActiveGrid). He was the founder, in 1991, of Persistence Software, a San Mateo, CA-based company that created a new approach for managing data in high-transaction banking and communications systems. Persistence Software investors included Cisco, Intel, Reuters and Sun Microsystems. The company went public in 1999 on the NASDAQ exchange and was sold in 2004 to Progress software.

After leaving Persistence Software in 2005, Chris spent a year in France as chairman of Reportive Software, a Paris-based maker of business-intelligence tools, and as an adjunct professor and entrepreneur-in-residence at INSEAD, a leading graduate business school.

Comments (1) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Peter Chang 12/13/04 01:57:42 PM EST

A shared data access service across enterprise data sources could fundamental problems like consistency. However, the big questions seems to be flexibility and performance. Can the service concisely provide data in the form required by the application or does a developer need to programatically filter and massage the output? Can the service query underlying data sources and translate the data into the abstract format (implemented by the shared data access layer) fast enough to meet usage requirements? Without both flexibility and performance, a shared data service would either cost more in terms of developer productivity or be too slow for other applications. In either case, it would limit the applications that can use the service and therefore limit the consistency and reuse benefits of building a shared data access service.

Peter Chang

@MicroservicesExpo Stories
The nature of test environments is inherently temporary—you set up an environment, run through an automated test suite, and then tear down the environment. If you can reduce the cycle time for this process down to hours or minutes, then you may be able to cut your test environment budgets considerably. The impact of cloud adoption on test environments is a valuable advancement in both cost savings and agility. The on-demand model takes advantage of public cloud APIs requiring only payment for t...
"Codigm is based on the cloud and we are here to explore marketing opportunities in America. Our mission is to make an ecosystem of the SW environment that anyone can understand, learn, teach, and develop the SW on the cloud," explained Sung Tae Ryu, CEO of Codigm, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
High-velocity engineering teams are applying not only continuous delivery processes, but also lessons in experimentation from established leaders like Amazon, Netflix, and Facebook. These companies have made experimentation a foundation for their release processes, allowing them to try out major feature releases and redesigns within smaller groups before making them broadly available. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Lucas, Senior Staff Engineer at Optimizely, discussed how by using ne...
Many enterprise and government IT organizations are realizing the benefits of cloud computing by extending IT delivery and management processes across private and public cloud services. But they are often challenged with balancing the need for centralized cloud governance without stifling user-driven innovation. This strategy requires an approach that fundamentally reshapes how IT is delivered today, shifting the focus from infrastructure to services aggregation, and mixing and matching the bes...
"CA has been doing a lot of things in the area of DevOps. Now we have a complete set of tool sets in order to enable customers to go all the way from planning to development to testing down to release into the operations," explained Aruna Ravichandran, Vice President of Global Marketing and Strategy at CA Technologies, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
While we understand Agile as a means to accelerate innovation, manage uncertainty and cope with ambiguity, many are inclined to think that it conflicts with the objectives of traditional engineering projects, such as building a highway, skyscraper or power plant. These are plan-driven and predictive projects that seek to avoid any uncertainty. This type of thinking, however, is short-sighted. Agile approaches are valuable in controlling uncertainty because they constrain the complexity that ste...
Cavirin Systems has just announced C2, a SaaS offering designed to bring continuous security assessment and remediation to hybrid environments, containers, and data centers. Cavirin C2 is deployed within Amazon Web Services (AWS) and features a flexible licensing model for easy scalability and clear pay-as-you-go pricing. Although native to AWS, it also supports assessment and remediation of virtual or container instances within Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), or on-premise. By dr...
"This all sounds great. But it's just not realistic." This is what a group of five senior IT executives told me during a workshop I held not long ago. We were working through an exercise on the organizational characteristics necessary to successfully execute a digital transformation, and the group was doing their ‘readout.' The executives loved everything we discussed and agreed that if such an environment existed, it would make transformation much easier. They just didn't believe it was reali...
"We're developing a software that is based on the cloud environment and we are providing those services to corporations and the general public," explained Seungmin Kim, CEO/CTO of SM Systems Inc., in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
It’s “time to move on from DevOps and continuous delivery.” This was the provocative title of a recent article in ZDNet, in which Kelsey Hightower, staff developer advocate at Google Cloud Platform, suggested that “software shops should have put these concepts into action years ago.” Reading articles like this or listening to talks at most DevOps conferences might make you think that we’re entering a post-DevOps world. But vast numbers of organizations still struggle to start and drive transfo...
Agile has finally jumped the technology shark, expanding outside the software world. Enterprises are now increasingly adopting Agile practices across their organizations in order to successfully navigate the disruptive waters that threaten to drown them. In our quest for establishing change as a core competency in our organizations, this business-centric notion of Agile is an essential component of Agile Digital Transformation. In the years since the publication of the Agile Manifesto, the conn...
The cloud revolution in enterprises has very clearly crossed the phase of proof-of-concepts into a truly mainstream adoption. One of most popular enterprise-wide initiatives currently going on are “cloud migration” programs of some kind or another. Finding business value for these programs is not hard to fathom – they include hyperelasticity in infrastructure consumption, subscription based models, and agility derived from rapid speed of deployment of applications. These factors will continue to...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
Let's do a visualization exercise. Imagine it's December 31, 2018, and you're ringing in the New Year with your friends and family. You think back on everything that you accomplished in the last year: your company's revenue is through the roof thanks to the success of your product, and you were promoted to Lead Developer. 2019 is poised to be an even bigger year for your company because you have the tools and insight to scale as quickly as demand requires. You're a happy human, and it's not just...
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...
DevOps teams have more on their plate than ever. As infrastructure needs grow, so does the time required to ensure that everything's running smoothly. This makes automation crucial - especially in the server and network monitoring world. Server monitoring tools can save teams time by automating server management and providing real-time performance updates. As budgets reset for the New Year, there is no better time to implement a new server monitoring tool (or re-evaluate your current solution)....
We just came off of a review of a product that handles both containers and virtual machines in the same interface. Under the covers, implementation of containers defaults to LXC, though recently Docker support was added. When reading online, or searching for information, increasingly we see “Container Management” products listed as competitors to Docker, when in reality things like Rocket, LXC/LXD, and Virtualization are Dockers competitors. After doing some looking around, we have decided tha...
"Opsani helps the enterprise adopt containers, help them move their infrastructure into this modern world of DevOps, accelerate the delivery of new features into production, and really get them going on the container path," explained Ross Schibler, CEO of Opsani, and Peter Nickolov, CTO of Opsani, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The benefits of automation are well documented; it increases productivity, cuts cost and minimizes errors. It eliminates repetitive manual tasks, freeing us up to be more innovative. By that logic, surely, we should automate everything possible, right? So, is attempting to automate everything a sensible - even feasible - goal? In a word: no. Consider this your short guide as to what to automate and what not to automate.
identify the sources of event storms and performance anomalies will require automated, real-time root-cause analysis. I think Enterprise Management Associates said it well: “The data and metrics collected at instrumentation points across the application ecosystem are essential to performance monitoring and root cause analysis. However, analytics capable of transforming data and metrics into an application-focused report or dashboards are what separates actual application monitoring from relat...