Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: LeanTaaS Blog, Derek Weeks, Don MacVittie, Karthick Viswanathan, Gopala Krishna Behara

Related Topics: Recurring Revenue, Containers Expo Blog

Recurring Revenue: Article

Life after Oracle and Dave Duffield's Workday Start-Up!

PeopleSoft founder Dave Duffield's Workday start-up sure has been a quiet little thing. So unlike the mouthy Salesforce.com

For a company born out of a headline-grabbing clash of wills between two industry titans - one practically beloved by his users, the other, well, not so much - a company set up to pioneer the latest disruptive distribution scheme, a model likely to change the face of the software industry forever, and use chi-chi infrastructure like Linux, Java, MySQL and Tomcat, PeopleSoft founder Dave Duffield's Workday start-up sure has been a quiet little thing. So unlike the mouthy Salesforce.com. So when we found out that industry analyst Amy Wohl was going that way we asked her to report back. Here's what she says.

When I first heard (in 2006) that David Duffield, the founder of PeopleSoft, was going to start a SaaS company to build a full-blown ERP portfolio I was excited. I felt that software-as-a-service, a game changer if ever there was one, was finally coming of age now that it was embraced by mainstream, enterprise-oriented, mission-critical software.

Of course, there are contradictions in that statement. SalesForce.com certainly thinks of itself as mainstream, enterprise-oriented, mission-critical software, but perhaps less so in 2006 than now. And Workday, Duffield's new company was not quite so ambitious; the initial goal and current focus is to build ERP software for the mid-market, focusing on companies with 100-600 employees, but it's got enterprise customers already, a year after its first software shipped.

But let's not talk about contradictions, instead let's examine Workday's plans and see how well things are going. I got an update this week from Stan Swete, Workday's CTO, that puts Workday on schedule with its roadmap.

Workday's plan was to provide software services in four areas: Human Capital Management; Resource Management; Financial Management and Revenue Management.

Human Capital Management was scheduled to be available first and went into production last November. It includes modules for organization, lifecycle, compensation and payroll management, and workforce development. Workday is currently using ADP for payroll management, but expects to have its own offering by 2009.

Resource Management includes Supplier Accounts, Expenses, Resource Management, and Procurement. It's scheduled to ship in 2008.

Financial Management includes Financial Accounting and Reporting, Cash Management, Planning and Budgeting, and Management Accounting. The Financial Accounting and Reporting and Cash Management modules are shipping now; other modules are expected to ship next year.

Revenues Management includes Customers Accounts, Orders, Billing, and Revenue Recognition. It's scheduled to ship in 2008.

Workday is currently shipping to about 25 customers, a two-to-one mixture of technology companies and non-technology companies. It's Workday's strategy to target technology and services organizations, especially in food services and professional services. Swete seemed a little surprised that it's seeing a smaller number of bigger deals than it planned, meaning it's returning more money than it thought it would at this point. It already has two larger-than-intended customers, Lifetime Fitness (17,000 employees) and, in the last few days, Chiquita (25,000).

Generally speaking Workday expects to be selling to customers who are new to sophisticated ERP solutions, rather than replacing existing implementations, although it's already replaced Peoplesoft/Oracle at McKee. Of course, it expects to move into replacement mode later on - when customers start finding it pricier to upgrade their old systems than to switch to the SaaS model - just as it expects to garner more enterprise customers. (SaaS is becoming more appealing to larger firms.)

Why, one might ask, is it seeing such early success? Workday and I are in pretty violent agreement here.

· The ERP solutions built by traditional software vendors are expensive to buy, very expensive to implement, and expensive to upgrade (since customizations often have to be entirely rewritten). That makes them not only expensive but inflexible, a barrier to the more agile and dynamic world of the Internet.

· Rewriting a traditional ERP solution to a SaaS platform is tough. ISVs have to address both business model and architectural issues. Efforts often flounder on the unwillingness of ISVs to understand that they're writing an application that might be used by an enterprise (that they'd like to keep on their current, more expensive software) as well as an SMB. Applications are often written to be deliberately less appealing to enterprise customers, shooting them in the foot. Of course, it's a lot easier to write a great SaaS application if you have no existing business model or installed software to consider.

· David Duffield has a great reputation. Many customers are delighted to consider any product he's associated with.

We asked if Workday had to sell SaaS before it could sell Workday. It's clear Workday's experience mirrors what we're seeing elsewhere:

o Prospects are much less concerned about going to SaaS; concerns about security have stopped being the barrier they once were.

o On the other hand, customers are much more concerned about whether they can get enough integration with their data and applications. Workday is confident it can supply these needs.

o Customers are also looking for the ability to use the application's configuration to provide some customization. Modern SaaS applications are designed to provide this.

I think that Workday's presence - and apparent success - in the marketplace are evidence that SaaS is growing up in both maturity and in the size of customer that will find it compelling. One should expect to see more companies join it in the business software marketplace over the next few years.

More Stories By Amy Wohl

Amy is a computer industry analyst who specializes in the commercialization of new technology. She has been observing, writing about, and commenting on the information technology industry for more than 30 years.

Her current specialties her SaaS, Cloud Computing, SOA, and the commercialization of new technologies. Her clients are software companies whom she assists with projects in new technologies, new concepts, and new products. She writes for both her clients and her own blogs and books.

In 2008, Mrs. Wohl published a book on SaaS and Cloud Computing.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@MicroservicesExpo Stories
The notion of improving operational efficiency is conspicuously absent from the healthcare debate - neither Obamacare nor the newly proposed GOP plan discusses the impact that a step-function improvement in efficiency could have on access to healthcare (through more capacity), quality of healthcare services (through reduced wait times for patients) or cost (through better utilization of scarce, expensive assets).
Some people are directors, managers, and administrators. Others are disrupters. Eddie Webb (@edwardawebb) is an IT Disrupter for Software Development Platforms at Liberty Mutual and was a presenter at the 2016 All Day DevOps conference. His talk, Organically DevOps: Building Quality and Security into the Software Supply Chain at Liberty Mutual, looked at Liberty Mutual's transformation to Continuous Integration, Continuous Delivery, and DevOps. For a large, heavily regulated industry, this task...
Our work, both with clients and with tools, has lead us to wonder how it is that organizations are handling compliance issues in the cloud. The big cloud vendors offer compliance for their infrastructure, but the shared responsibility model requires that you take certain steps to meet compliance requirements. Which lead us to start poking around a little more. We wanted to get a picture of what was available, and how it was being used. There is a lot of fluidity in this space, as in all things c...
Gone are the days when application development was the daunting task of the highly skilled developers backed with strong IT skills, low code application development has democratized app development and empowered a new generation of citizen developers. There was a time when app development was in the domain of people with complex coding and technical skills. We called these people by various names like programmers, coders, techies, and they usually worked in a world oblivious of the everyday pri...
The goal of Microservices is to improve software delivery speed and increase system safety as scale increases. Microservices being modular these are faster to change and enables an evolutionary architecture where systems can change, as the business needs change. Microservices can scale elastically and by being service oriented can enable APIs natively. Microservices also reduce implementation and release cycle time and enables continuous delivery. This paper provides a logical overview of the Mi...
The “Digital Era” is forcing us to engage with new methods to build, operate and maintain applications. This transformation also implies an evolution to more and more intelligent applications to better engage with the customers, while creating significant market differentiators. In both cases, the cloud has become a key enabler to embrace this digital revolution. So, moving to the cloud is no longer the question; the new questions are HOW and WHEN. To make this equation even more complex, most ...
Some journey to cloud on a mission, others, a deadline. Change management is useful when migrating to public, private or hybrid cloud environments in either case. For most, stakeholder engagement peaks during the planning and post migration phases of a project. Legacy engagements are fairly direct: projects follow a linear progression of activities (the “waterfall” approach) – change managers and application coders work from the same functional and technical requirements. Enablement and develo...
Admiral Calcote - also known as Lee Calcote (@lcalcote) or the Ginger Geek to his friends - gave a presentation entitled Characterizing and Contrasting Container Orchestrators at the 2016 All Day DevOps conference. Okay, he isn't really an admiral - nor does anyone call him that - but he used the title admiral to describe what container orchestrators do, relating it to an admiral directing a fleet of container ships. You could also say that they are like the conductor of an orchestra, directing...
The past few years have brought a sea change in the way applications are architected, developed, and consumed—increasing both the complexity of testing and the business impact of software failures. How can software testing professionals keep pace with modern application delivery, given the trends that impact both architectures (cloud, microservices, and APIs) and processes (DevOps, agile, and continuous delivery)? This is where continuous testing comes in. D
Modern software design has fundamentally changed how we manage applications, causing many to turn to containers as the new virtual machine for resource management. As container adoption grows beyond stateless applications to stateful workloads, the need for persistent storage is foundational - something customers routinely cite as a top pain point. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Bill Borsari, Head of Systems Engineering at Datera, explored how organizations can reap the bene...
The dynamic nature of the cloud means that change is a constant when it comes to modern cloud-based infrastructure. Delivering modern applications to end users, therefore, is a constantly shifting challenge. Delivery automation helps IT Ops teams ensure that apps are providing an optimal end user experience over hybrid-cloud and multi-cloud environments, no matter what the current state of the infrastructure is. To employ a delivery automation strategy that reflects your business rules, making r...
Gaining visibility in today’s sprawling cloud infrastructure is complex and laborious, involving drilling down into tools offered by various cloud services providers. Enterprise IT organizations need smarter and effective tools at their disposal in order to address this pertinent problem. Gaining a 360 - degree view of the cloud costs requires collection and analysis of the cost data across all cloud infrastructures used inside an enterprise.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Synametrics Technologies will exhibit at SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 5-7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Synametrics Technologies is a privately held company based in Plainsboro, New Jersey that has been providing solutions for the developer community since 1997. Based on the success of its initial product offerings such as WinSQL, Xeams, SynaMan and Syncrify, Synametrics continues to create and hone in...
Kubernetes is an open source system for automating deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. Kubernetes was originally built by Google, leveraging years of experience with managing container workloads, and is now a Cloud Native Compute Foundation (CNCF) project. Kubernetes has been widely adopted by the community, supported on all major public and private cloud providers, and is gaining rapid adoption in enterprises. However, Kubernetes may seem intimidating and complex ...
You know you need the cloud, but you’re hesitant to simply dump everything at Amazon since you know that not all workloads are suitable for cloud. You know that you want the kind of ease of use and scalability that you get with public cloud, but your applications are architected in a way that makes the public cloud a non-starter. You’re looking at private cloud solutions based on hyperconverged infrastructure, but you’re concerned with the limits inherent in those technologies.
For DevOps teams, the concepts behind service-oriented architecture (SOA) are nothing new. A style of software design initially made popular in the 1990s, SOA was an alternative to a monolithic application; essentially a collection of coarse-grained components that communicated with each other. Communication would involve either simple data passing or two or more services coordinating some activity. SOA served as a valid approach to solving many architectural problems faced by businesses, as app...
Many IT organizations have come to learn that leveraging cloud infrastructure is not just unavoidable, it’s one of the most effective paths for IT organizations to become more responsive to business needs. Yet with the cloud comes new challenges, including minimizing downtime, decreasing the cost of operations, and preventing employee burnout to name a few. As companies migrate their processes and procedures to their new reality of a cloud-based infrastructure, an incident management solution...
Cloud Governance means many things to many people. Heck, just the word cloud means different things depending on who you are talking to. While definitions can vary, controlling access to cloud resources is invariably a central piece of any governance program. Enterprise cloud computing has transformed IT. Cloud computing decreases time-to-market, improves agility by allowing businesses to adapt quickly to changing market demands, and, ultimately, drives down costs.
Recent survey done across top 500 fortune companies shows almost 70% of the CIO have either heard about IAC from their infrastructure head or they are on their way to implement IAC. Yet if you look under the hood while some level of automation has been done, most of the infrastructure is still managed in much tradition/legacy way. So, what is Infrastructure as Code? how do you determine if your IT infrastructure is truly automated?
Every few years, a disruptive force comes along that prompts us to reframe our understanding of what something means, or how it works. For years, the notion of what a computer is and how you make one went pretty much unchallenged. Then virtualization came along, followed by cloud computing, and most recently containers. Suddenly the old rules no longer seemed to apply, or at least they didn’t always apply. These disruptors made us reconsider our IT worldview.