| By Nati Shalom |
Article Rating: |
|
| April 11, 2007 03:00 PM EDT |
Reads: |
11,285 |
Nati Shalom's BlogWhile I think that many technical folks are in violent agreement that Web Services and SOA are not necessarily the same thing, the question:
what is the alternative approach? remains unanswered.
Geva Perry covered the topic of
Scalable SOA in one of his recent blogs. Geva quotes upcoming SOA World 2008 East keynote speaker Dave Linthicum ("SOA for the real world"):
"Making solutions scale is nothing new. However, the SOA technology and approaches recently employed are largely untested with higher application and information and service management traffic loads. SOA implementers were happy to get their solutions up-and-running, however in many cases scalability is simply not a consideration within the SOA, nor was load testing, or other performance fundamentals. We are seeing the results of this neglect now that SOA problem domains are exceeding the capacity of their architectures and the technology in many instances."
Quoting Jason Bloomberg from his Principles of SOA article:
"The most important missing piece, however, is the top-down approach to SOA outlined in this article. Most of today's thinking about Web services is bottom up: ''Here's how to build Web services, now let's use them for integration.'"
Everyone seems to be struggling to define an alternative approach to WS*, however, very few provide a clear end-to-end definition on how to turn existing stateful tier-based applications into linearly scalable services. Throwing a messaging-bus at the problem ain't gonna cut it. I would even argue that it could possibly make things worse.
There is a growing class of applications -- specifically those that are categorized as XTP (Xtreme Transaction Processing) applications -- in which SOA in its WS* form adds no value due to the fact that the services in this environment are stateful and need to interact at high speeds, while keeping the latency low.
So what should be the platform for High Performance SOA?
There are several emerging frameworks, such as
OSGI and
Mule, that provide an alternative SOA approach. What is common to these frameworks is the fact that they are POJO-driven, lightweight and highly efficient in terms of performance and footprint. It is therefore not surprising that these frameworks are gaining momentum and are becoming de-facto standards for building high-performance SOA applications.
While this initial set of platforms already exists, I think that we still lack the top-down view that Jason was referring to. That is where Space-Based Architecture fits in. In the following reference
SBA and SOA I tried to describe how SBA fits into the SOA world as a pattern for turning stateful-tier-based-applications into linearly scalable services.
Subscribe to SOA World Magazine Email News Alerts
Subscribe via RSS
