Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Zakia Bouachraoui

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Article

SOA - Loosely Coupled...What?

For both technical and business advantages

With the advent of Web services and SOA, we've been seeking to create architectures and systems that are more loosely coupled. Loosely coupled systems provide many advantages including support for late or dynamically binding to other components while running, and can mediate the difference in the component's structure, security model, protocols, and semantics, thus abstracting volatility.

This is in contrast to compile-time or runtime binding, which requires that you bind the components at compile time or runtime (synchronous calls), respectively, and also requires that changes be designed into all components at the same time due to the dependencies. As you can imagine, this type of coupling makes testing and component changes much more difficult.

The advantages of loosely coupled architectures, as found within many SOAs, are apparent to many of us who have built architectures and systems in the past, at least from a technical perspective. However, they have business value as well.
First and foremost, a loosely coupled architecture allows you to replace components, or change components, without having to make reflective changes to other components in the architecture/systems. This means businesses can change their business systems as needed, with much more agility than if the architecture/systems were more tightly coupled. Second, developers can pick and choose the right enabling technology for the job without concerning themselves with technical dependencies, such as security models. Thus, you can build new components using J2EE, which will work and play well with other components written in Cobol or perhaps C++. Same goes for persistence layers, middleware, protocols, etc. You can mix and match to exactly meet your needs, even leverage services that may exist outside of your organization without regard to how that service was created, how it communicates, nor where it is running.

Finally, with this degree of independence, components are protected from each other and can better recover from component failure. If the SOA is designed correctly, the failure of a single component should not take down other components in the system. Thus, loose coupling creates architectures that are more resilient. Moreover, this also lends itself better to creating a failover subsystem, moving from one instance of a component to another without affecting the other components in the SOA.

It should be noted, however, that not all tight coupling is bad. Indeed, in some cases it makes sense to more tightly couple components, such as when the dependencies are critical to the design. An example would be two services that can't work apart and must function as one, and thus are better tightly coupled. You have to look at your requirement, and then determine the degree of coupling required in your architecture, and it may not always be loose coupling.

Now that we know the basic differences between a tightly and loosely coupled architecture, as well as the advantages, perhaps it's a good idea to break down loose coupling into a few basic patterns: location independence, communication independence, security independence, and instance independence.

Location independence refers to the notion that it matters not where the service exists, the other components that need to leverage the service can discovery it within a directory and leverage it through the late binding process. This comes in handy when you're leveraging services that are consistently changing physical and logical locations, especially services outside your organization that you may not own. Your risk calculation service may exist in LA on Monday and in New York on Friday, and it should make no difference to you.

Dynamic discovery is key to this, meaning that calling components can locate service information as needed, and without having to bind tightly to the service. Typically, these services are private, shared, or public service as they exist within the directory.
Communications independence means that all components can talk to each other no matter how they communicate at the interface or protocol levels. Thus, we leverage enabling standards, such as Web services, to mediate the protocol and interface difference.
Security independence refers to the concept of mediating the difference between security models in and between components. This is a bit difficult to pull off, but necessary to any SOA. To enable this pattern, you'll have to leverage a federated security system that's able to create trust between components, no matter which security model is local to the components. This has been the primary force behind the number of federated security standards that have emerged in support of a loosely coupled model and Web services.

Instance independence means that the architecture should support component-to-component communications, using both a synchronous and asynchronous model, and not require that the other component be in any particular state before receiving the request, or the message. Thus, if done right, all of the services should be able to service any requesting component, asynchronously, as well as retain and manage state no matter what the sequencing is.

The need for loosely coupled architecture within your SOA is really not the question. If you have a SOA, you should have a loosely coupled architecture, if done correctly. However, analysis and planning are also part of the mix...understanding your requirements and how each component of your architecture should leverage the other components of your architecture. With a bit of up-front work, you'll find your coupling loose and your SOA successful.

More Stories By David Linthicum

Dave Linthicum is Sr. VP at Cloud Technology Partners, and an internationally known cloud computing and SOA expert. He is a sought-after consultant, speaker, and blogger. In his career, Dave has formed or enhanced many of the ideas behind modern distributed computing including EAI, B2B Application Integration, and SOA, approaches and technologies in wide use today. In addition, he is the Editor-in-Chief of SYS-CON's Virtualization Journal.

For the last 10 years, he has focused on the technology and strategies around cloud computing, including working with several cloud computing startups. His industry experience includes tenure as CTO and CEO of several successful software and cloud computing companies, and upper-level management positions in Fortune 500 companies. In addition, he was an associate professor of computer science for eight years, and continues to lecture at major technical colleges and universities, including University of Virginia and Arizona State University. He keynotes at many leading technology conferences, and has several well-read columns and blogs. Linthicum has authored 10 books, including the ground-breaking "Enterprise Application Integration" and "B2B Application Integration." You can reach him at [email protected] Or follow him on Twitter. Or view his profile on LinkedIn.

Comments (2) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Mike 10/18/07 04:39:44 PM EDT

Can more be said about "...Thus, we leverage enabling standards, such as Web services, to mediate the protocol and interface difference...."? An example would be nice :) The service is described by WSDL, so there is no option on calling it any other way that WSDL describes. Web services by default indicate HTTP/HTTPS type of protocol....

Mike

Peter 10/15/07 06:18:10 PM EDT

I really like the tight coupled is not inheritantly evil approach;) but would really like some samples of when SOA is a VERY bad option. They exist - don't they?

Easy loosely coupled systems work great, esp for internet services. Eg. a StockQuote Service which inputs a String, and outputs a string. And it is displayed only once on user login. Web App pings the service, and displays results which are likely cached. Ez.

A much harder scenario is if every page the user traverses, every stock on the page content must be listed, along with history, graphs, news items, etc. Lets say this is a intranet service, with 5 consuming apps. Maybe much more performant with jdbc/hibernate/spring bean? What if each app is worried only about its own "set" of stocks? Might be a horrible example, but I think you get what i am asking ;)

Microservices Articles
CloudEXPO New York 2018, colocated with DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City and will bring together Cloud Computing, FinTech and Blockchain, Digital Transformation, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, AI, Machine Learning and WebRTC to one location.
DevOpsSummit New York 2018, colocated with CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City. Digital Transformation (DX) is a major focus with the introduction of DXWorldEXPO within the program. Successful transformation requires a laser focus on being data-driven and on using all the tools available that enable transformation if they plan to survive over the long term.
Enterprise architects are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies as they seek to utilize existing data center assets, leverage the advantages of cloud computing and avoid cloud vendor lock-in. This requires a globally aware traffic management strategy that can monitor infrastructure health across data centers and end-user experience globally, while responding to control changes and system specification at the speed of today’s DevOps teams. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Gray, Chie...
Containers and Kubernetes allow for code portability across on-premise VMs, bare metal, or multiple cloud provider environments. Yet, despite this portability promise, developers may include configuration and application definitions that constrain or even eliminate application portability. In this session we'll describe best practices for "configuration as code" in a Kubernetes environment. We will demonstrate how a properly constructed containerized app can be deployed to both Amazon and Azure ...
Most DevOps journeys involve several phases of maturity. Research shows that the inflection point where organizations begin to see maximum value is when they implement tight integration deploying their code to their infrastructure. Success at this level is the last barrier to at-will deployment. Storage, for instance, is more capable than where we read and write data. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Atwell, a Developer Advocate for NetApp, will discuss the role and value...
Modern software design has fundamentally changed how we manage applications, causing many to turn to containers as the new virtual machine for resource management. As container adoption grows beyond stateless applications to stateful workloads, the need for persistent storage is foundational - something customers routinely cite as a top pain point. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Bill Borsari, Head of Systems Engineering at Datera, explored how organizations can reap the bene...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Scott Davis, CTO of Embotics, discussed how automation can provide the dynamic management required to cost-effectively deliver microservices and container solutions at scale. He also discussed how flexible automation is the key to effectively bridging and seamlessly coordinating both IT and developer needs for component orchestration across disparate clouds – an increasingly important requirement at today’s multi-cloud enterprise.
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Mike Johnston, an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io, discussed how to use Kubernetes to set up a SaaS infrastructure for your business. Mike Johnston is an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io with over 12 years of experience designing, deploying, and maintaining server and workstation infrastructure at all scales. He has experience with brick and mortar data centers as well as cloud providers like Digital Ocean, Amazon Web Services, and Rackspace. H...
SYS-CON Events announced today that DatacenterDynamics has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7–9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. DatacenterDynamics is a brand of DCD Group, a global B2B media and publishing company that develops products to help senior professionals in the world's most ICT dependent organizations make risk-based infrastructure and capacity decisions.
Consumer-driven contracts are an essential part of a mature microservice testing portfolio enabling independent service deployments. In this presentation we'll provide an overview of the tools, patterns and pain points we've seen when implementing contract testing in large development organizations.