Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Pat Romanski, AppNeta Blog, Liz McMillan

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Article

Pragmatic SOA Interoperability

Architecture, not new middleware

A well-planned Web Service interoperability environment begins by clearly defining who your Web Service consumers are now and in the future. There was a time not so long ago when you could count on a fairly homogenous consumer population. This was about the same time that you were happy just to be able to get a Web Service running in the first place and finding a consumer who could actually interact with your Web Service was cause for celebration. Those days have changed however and Web Services interoperability, once a "fancy" addition to your SOA design, is now a key and indispensable requirement in most SOA scenarios.

Today, SOA architects must contend with complex scenarios that assume a variety of Web Service consumers or in many cases are asked to create Web Services that are generic enough to be interoperable with just about any known consumer. If you're serious about implementing SOA in your worldwide enterprise you'll have to forget about the luxury of being able to dictate the configuration of all of your consumers and instead build fully interoperable Web Services. Most robust Internet Web Service APIs, familiar to all of us such as Amazon.com, eBay, or Salesforce.com, have learned this lesson already with very successful results. Those companies know that Web Service interoperability lies in the architecture approach and not in the implementation of new middleware.

What Makes Interoperability So Challenging?

Standards Proliferation and Complexity
The interaction between Web Services and consumers is rooted on a set of standards developed by standards organization committees at OASIS, W3C, and WS-I. These standards such as XML Schema, SOAP, WSDL, and WS-* protocols are intended to provide a technology-agnostic level of abstraction over the service implementation which should theoretically guarantee interoperability. However, it's not the standards themselves, but their implementation by individual Web Service technology vendors that must be interoperable. In a perfect world, every vendor would implement Web Services standards in exactly the same way, which would guarantee interoperability out-of-the-box. As you must know, that's just too good to be true. In the real world, every vendor implements these standards sometimes with just slight variations and other times entirely different versions. In many other cases vendors choose which aspects of a standard to implement, or maybe even choose not to implement a given standard at all. This proliferation and complexity is most obvious when we look at the WS-* protocols.

When this article was written, up to four different WS-Addressing versions were in use. Three versions of the specification are named by their release date: the March 2003 version, the March 2004 version, and the August 2004 version, developed before the specification moved to W3C. The fourth version, 1.0, was completed in May 2006 and developed after the specification went under the W3C umbrella. And if that's not confusing enough, after moving to W3C, the specification split into multiple parts: a core specification and two other specifications that describe bindings for SOAP and WSDL.

There are also different WS-* protocols that address very similar scenarios such as WS-Eventing and WS-Notifications, WS-MessageDelivery and WS-Addressing or WS-Reliability and WS-ReliableMessaging. Committees from OASIS and W3C are working to unify those overlapped protocols into a single set of standards. Vendors can and often implement different versions of the same WS-* protocol or implement one of multiple similar standards such as WS-ReliableMessaging instead of WS-Reliability.

Although the combination of SOAP and WS-* protocols provide a solution for some of the most interesting challenges in distributed computing, the complexity of this approach makes it impractical and nearly impossible to implement in real-world interoperability scenarios. Just a small subset of the over 100 WS-* standards specifications available today have been implemented by vendors. One last, but certainly not least, challenge involved in using SOAP and WS-* protocols is that they can also limit the service availability to clients such as script applications or Web browsers that don't support that generation of SOAP messages.

Best Practice: Use WS-I Profiles
Some WS-* protocols have a WS-I profile available that contains some of the principles and a subset of features of the protocols that should be implemented to guarantee interoperability. Making the services compatible with a WS-I profile (is this one exists) is a standard and globally accepted approach to interoperability. However for some protocols, a WS-I profile isn't available or doesn't address the interoperability requirements.

Best Practice: Implement Multi-Binding Services
To support multiple versions of the same WS-* protocol it's recommended to design the services with multiple bindings per specific versions of the protocol. This approach segments the different types of interactions at the binding level improving aspects like versioning, management, etc. The code in Listings 1 and 2 illustrates a sample Microsoft Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Service configured to support multiple types of interactions using bindings. Specifically, this service supports secure and reliable interactions as well as basic SOAP interactions using two different bindings.

Best Practice: Exposes SOAP and REST Interfaces
Resource State Transfer (REST) provides a simpler alternative to the use of SOAP and the WS-* protocols for some scenarios. The fact that REST is based on XML messages over HTTP makes it accessible to most of the client technologies on the market including browsers and script languages. Some services can expose both SOAP and REST interfaces and offer a broader set of options to consumers. The example in Listing 3 illustrates that approach using Oracle Application Server.

Aligning Code and Contract
When designing a service you must first consider where to start. Do you create your code first or your contract first? Or do you give them each equal importance by creating them in parallel. However, even if you were extremely diligent in developing perfect synergy between your code and your contract you would still find that the limitations of the basic standards themselves, such as XSD and WSDL, could easily do you in. For example, the XML Schema model presents severe limitations in terms of composability compared with most programming languages data structures. This is often reflected in non-optimal translations between XML Schema structures and programming data structures. Similarly, WSDL 1.0 and 2.0 are both too abstract for describing services that can be interpreted by Web Services frameworks in a consistent way.

There's a lot of debate in the Web Service community around whether to use a contract-first versus a code-first approach to develop Web Services. One of the common arguments in favor of a contract-first approach is that it facilitates interoperability. Whether that's arguably true, the reality is that just a few mortals know WSDL and XSD well enough to design solid service contracts. Given the complexities of both standards developers often end up designing non-optimal WSDLs and XSDs that are translated into poor service implementations. On the other hand, a code-first approach is more familiar to developers but can produce contracts that aren't interoperable.

Best Practice Recommendation
Some of the most successful Web Service implementations have been designed using a hybrid approach that combines the agility of a code-first approach with the flexibility of a XSD/WSDL-first approach. Following these technique developers can leverage their existing skills on a particular development platform to guarantee an optimal service implementation while the WSDL-XSD experts verify that the contract is suited to meeting the interoperability needs. Figure 1 illustrates this approach.

Multi-Transport Services
SOAP, WSDL, and the different WS-* protocols are transport-agnostic specifications. Theoretically it's possible to host the same service using multiple transports such as HTTP, TCP, JMS, etc. Although this feature is supported by some of the Web Services technology frameworks on the market such as Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) or Apache Axis, only HTTP has been adopted widely enough to be considered for interoperability scenarios. Another factor to consider when implementing multi-transport services in real-world scenarios is that certain transports require a specific behavior of the service. For instance, a Web Service that uses JMS as a transport probably implements one-way, long-running, and asynchronous operations. That behavior is fundamentally different from a Web Service that uses HTTP as a transport on which it makes sense to implement atomic operations using different multiple exchange patterns. Hosting the same Web Services using JMS and HTTP makes little or no sense in most of the scenarios.


More Stories By Jesus Rodriguez

Jesus Rodriguez is a co-founder and CEO of KidoZen, an enterprise mobile-first platform as a service redefining the future of enterprise mobile solutions. He is also the co-founder to Tellago, an award-winning professional services firm focused on big enterprise software trends. Under his leadership, KidoZen and Tellago have been recognized as an innovator in the areas of enterprise software and solutions achieving important awards like the Inc 500, Stevie Awards’ American and International Business Awards.

A software scientist by background, Jesus is an internationally recognized speaker and author with contributions that include hundreds of articles and sessions at industry conferences. He serves as an advisor to several software companies such as Microsoft and Oracle, sits at the board of different technology companies. Jesus is a prolific blogger on all subjects related to software technology and entrepreneurship. You can gain valuable insight on business and software technology through his blogs at http://jrodthoughts.com and http://weblogs.asp.net/gsusx .

More Stories By Javier Mariscal

Javier Mariscal is the President and Founder of TwoConnect, Inc, a highly renowned consulting and systems integration company based in Miami, Florida with subsidiary offices in New York City, and San Francisco. After nearly 15 years, Javier is still mostly responsible for guaranteeing that TwoConnect’s innovative integration solutions deliver real and immediate results to its clients. As an author and frequent speaker on SOA and related technologies, Javier constantly reaffirms the need for “practical SOA” which focuses not on pushing a brand or a platform but on delivering immediate business rewards. Under his leadership, TwoConnect has been the first to market with multiple SOA related products and solutions such as the Web Services Enhancements 3.0 Adapter for Microsoft BizTalk Server and the SQL Server Service Broker Enhancements, both currently in production at companies worldwide. In 2006, TwoConnect announced a new line of products and services under its AdapterWorx brand, which has been hugely successful in accelerating its SOA solutions delivered. Following the success of AdapterWorx and a banner year in 2006 in general, Javier was nominated for Entrepreneur of the Year by Hispanic Business Magazine.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@MicroservicesExpo Stories
For organizations that have amassed large sums of software complexity, taking a microservices approach is the first step toward DevOps and continuous improvement / development. Integrating system-level analysis with microservices makes it easier to change and add functionality to applications at any time without the increase of risk. Before you start big transformation projects or a cloud migration, make sure these changes won’t take down your entire organization.
DevOps is often described as a combination of technology and culture. Without both, DevOps isn't complete. However, applying the culture to outdated technology is a recipe for disaster; as response times grow and connections between teams are delayed by technology, the culture will die. A Nutanix Enterprise Cloud has many benefits that provide the needed base for a true DevOps paradigm.
In recent years, containers have taken the world by storm. Companies of all sizes and industries have realized the massive benefits of containers, such as unprecedented mobility, higher hardware utilization, and increased flexibility and agility; however, many containers today are non-persistent. Containers without persistence miss out on many benefits, and in many cases simply pass the responsibility of persistence onto other infrastructure, adding additional complexity.
DevOps is often described as a combination of technology and culture. Without both, DevOps isn't complete. However, applying the culture to outdated technology is a recipe for disaster; as response times grow and connections between teams are delayed by technology, the culture will die. A Nutanix Enterprise Cloud has many benefits that provide the needed base for a true DevOps paradigm. In his Day 3 Keynote at 20th Cloud Expo, Chris Brown, a Solutions Marketing Manager at Nutanix, will explore t...
Everyone wants to use containers, but monitoring containers is hard. New ephemeral architecture introduces new challenges in how monitoring tools need to monitor and visualize containers, so your team can make sense of everything. In his session at @DevOpsSummit, David Gildeh, co-founder and CEO of Outlyer, will go through the challenges and show there is light at the end of the tunnel if you use the right tools and understand what you need to be monitoring to successfully use containers in your...
The IT industry is undergoing a significant evolution to keep up with cloud application demand. We see this happening as a mindset shift, from traditional IT teams to more well-rounded, cloud-focused job roles. The IT industry has become so cloud-minded that Gartner predicts that by 2020, this cloud shift will impact more than $1 trillion of global IT spending. This shift, however, has left some IT professionals feeling a little anxious about what lies ahead. The good news is that cloud computin...
What if you could build a web application that could support true web-scale traffic without having to ever provision or manage a single server? Sounds magical, and it is! In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Chris Munns, Senior Developer Advocate for Serverless Applications at Amazon Web Services, will show how to build a serverless website that scales automatically using services like AWS Lambda, Amazon API Gateway, and Amazon S3. We will review several frameworks that can help you build serverle...
The essence of cloud computing is that all consumable IT resources are delivered as services. In his session at 15th Cloud Expo, Yung Chou, Technology Evangelist at Microsoft, demonstrated the concepts and implementations of two important cloud computing deliveries: Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS). He discussed from business and technical viewpoints what exactly they are, why we care, how they are different and in what ways, and the strategies for IT to transi...
Culture is the most important ingredient of DevOps. The challenge for most organizations is defining and communicating a vision of beneficial DevOps culture for their organizations, and then facilitating the changes needed to achieve that. Often this comes down to an ability to provide true leadership. As a CIO, are your direct reports IT managers or are they IT leaders? The hard truth is that many IT managers have risen through the ranks based on their technical skills, not their leadership abi...
Thanks to Docker and the DevOps revolution, microservices have emerged as the new way to build and deploy applications — and there are plenty of great reasons to embrace the microservices trend. If you are going to adopt microservices, you also have to understand that microservice architectures have many moving parts. When it comes to incident management, this presents an important difference between microservices and monolithic architectures. More moving parts mean more complexity to monitor an...
SYS-CON Events announced today that HTBase will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. HTBase (Gartner 2016 Cool Vendor) delivers a Composable IT infrastructure solution architected for agility and increased efficiency. It turns compute, storage, and fabric into fluid pools of resources that are easily composed and re-composed to meet each application’s needs. With HTBase, companies can quickly prov...
Microservices (μServices) are a fascinating evolution of the Distributed Object Computing (DOC) paradigm. Initial design of DOC attempted to solve the problem of simplifying developing complex distributed applications by applying object-oriented design principles to disparate components operating across networked infrastructure. In this model, DOC “hid” the complexity of making this work from the developer regardless of the deployment architecture through the use of complex frameworks, such as C...
As Enterprise business moves from Monoliths to Microservices, adoption and successful implementations of Microservices become more evident. The goal of Microservices is to improve software delivery speed and increase system safety as scale increases. Documenting hurdles and problems for the use of Microservices will help consultants, architects and specialists to avoid repeating the same mistakes and learn how and when to use (or not use) Microservices at the enterprise level. The circumstance w...
With major technology companies and startups seriously embracing Cloud strategies, now is the perfect time to attend @CloudExpo | @ThingsExpo, June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY and October 31 - November 2, 2017, Santa Clara Convention Center, CA. Learn what is going on, contribute to the discussions, and ensure that your enterprise is on the right path to Digital Transformation.
@DevOpsSummit at Cloud taking place June 6-8, 2017, at Javits Center, New York City, is co-located with the 20th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long developm...
In his General Session at 16th Cloud Expo, David Shacochis, host of The Hybrid IT Files podcast and Vice President at CenturyLink, investigated three key trends of the “gigabit economy" though the story of a Fortune 500 communications company in transformation. Narrating how multi-modal hybrid IT, service automation, and agile delivery all intersect, he will cover the role of storytelling and empathy in achieving strategic alignment between the enterprise and its information technology.
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service.
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...
As software becomes more and more complex, we, as software developers, have been splitting up our code into smaller and smaller components. This is also true for the environment in which we run our code: going from bare metal, to VMs to the modern-day Cloud Native world of containers, schedulers and micro services. While we have figured out how to run containerized applications in the cloud using schedulers, we've yet to come up with a good solution to bridge the gap between getting your contain...
TechTarget storage websites are the best online information resource for news, tips and expert advice for the storage, backup and disaster recovery markets. By creating abundant, high-quality editorial content across more than 140 highly targeted technology-specific websites, TechTarget attracts and nurtures communities of technology buyers researching their companies' information technology needs. By understanding these buyers' content consumption behaviors, TechTarget creates the purchase inte...