Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: John Worthington, Pat Romanski, Stackify Blog, Automic Blog, Simon Hill

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Article

Pragmatic SOA Interoperability

Architecture, not new middleware

A well-planned Web Service interoperability environment begins by clearly defining who your Web Service consumers are now and in the future. There was a time not so long ago when you could count on a fairly homogenous consumer population. This was about the same time that you were happy just to be able to get a Web Service running in the first place and finding a consumer who could actually interact with your Web Service was cause for celebration. Those days have changed however and Web Services interoperability, once a "fancy" addition to your SOA design, is now a key and indispensable requirement in most SOA scenarios.

Today, SOA architects must contend with complex scenarios that assume a variety of Web Service consumers or in many cases are asked to create Web Services that are generic enough to be interoperable with just about any known consumer. If you're serious about implementing SOA in your worldwide enterprise you'll have to forget about the luxury of being able to dictate the configuration of all of your consumers and instead build fully interoperable Web Services. Most robust Internet Web Service APIs, familiar to all of us such as Amazon.com, eBay, or Salesforce.com, have learned this lesson already with very successful results. Those companies know that Web Service interoperability lies in the architecture approach and not in the implementation of new middleware.

What Makes Interoperability So Challenging?

Standards Proliferation and Complexity
The interaction between Web Services and consumers is rooted on a set of standards developed by standards organization committees at OASIS, W3C, and WS-I. These standards such as XML Schema, SOAP, WSDL, and WS-* protocols are intended to provide a technology-agnostic level of abstraction over the service implementation which should theoretically guarantee interoperability. However, it's not the standards themselves, but their implementation by individual Web Service technology vendors that must be interoperable. In a perfect world, every vendor would implement Web Services standards in exactly the same way, which would guarantee interoperability out-of-the-box. As you must know, that's just too good to be true. In the real world, every vendor implements these standards sometimes with just slight variations and other times entirely different versions. In many other cases vendors choose which aspects of a standard to implement, or maybe even choose not to implement a given standard at all. This proliferation and complexity is most obvious when we look at the WS-* protocols.

When this article was written, up to four different WS-Addressing versions were in use. Three versions of the specification are named by their release date: the March 2003 version, the March 2004 version, and the August 2004 version, developed before the specification moved to W3C. The fourth version, 1.0, was completed in May 2006 and developed after the specification went under the W3C umbrella. And if that's not confusing enough, after moving to W3C, the specification split into multiple parts: a core specification and two other specifications that describe bindings for SOAP and WSDL.

There are also different WS-* protocols that address very similar scenarios such as WS-Eventing and WS-Notifications, WS-MessageDelivery and WS-Addressing or WS-Reliability and WS-ReliableMessaging. Committees from OASIS and W3C are working to unify those overlapped protocols into a single set of standards. Vendors can and often implement different versions of the same WS-* protocol or implement one of multiple similar standards such as WS-ReliableMessaging instead of WS-Reliability.

Although the combination of SOAP and WS-* protocols provide a solution for some of the most interesting challenges in distributed computing, the complexity of this approach makes it impractical and nearly impossible to implement in real-world interoperability scenarios. Just a small subset of the over 100 WS-* standards specifications available today have been implemented by vendors. One last, but certainly not least, challenge involved in using SOAP and WS-* protocols is that they can also limit the service availability to clients such as script applications or Web browsers that don't support that generation of SOAP messages.

Best Practice: Use WS-I Profiles
Some WS-* protocols have a WS-I profile available that contains some of the principles and a subset of features of the protocols that should be implemented to guarantee interoperability. Making the services compatible with a WS-I profile (is this one exists) is a standard and globally accepted approach to interoperability. However for some protocols, a WS-I profile isn't available or doesn't address the interoperability requirements.

Best Practice: Implement Multi-Binding Services
To support multiple versions of the same WS-* protocol it's recommended to design the services with multiple bindings per specific versions of the protocol. This approach segments the different types of interactions at the binding level improving aspects like versioning, management, etc. The code in Listings 1 and 2 illustrates a sample Microsoft Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Service configured to support multiple types of interactions using bindings. Specifically, this service supports secure and reliable interactions as well as basic SOAP interactions using two different bindings.

Best Practice: Exposes SOAP and REST Interfaces
Resource State Transfer (REST) provides a simpler alternative to the use of SOAP and the WS-* protocols for some scenarios. The fact that REST is based on XML messages over HTTP makes it accessible to most of the client technologies on the market including browsers and script languages. Some services can expose both SOAP and REST interfaces and offer a broader set of options to consumers. The example in Listing 3 illustrates that approach using Oracle Application Server.

Aligning Code and Contract
When designing a service you must first consider where to start. Do you create your code first or your contract first? Or do you give them each equal importance by creating them in parallel. However, even if you were extremely diligent in developing perfect synergy between your code and your contract you would still find that the limitations of the basic standards themselves, such as XSD and WSDL, could easily do you in. For example, the XML Schema model presents severe limitations in terms of composability compared with most programming languages data structures. This is often reflected in non-optimal translations between XML Schema structures and programming data structures. Similarly, WSDL 1.0 and 2.0 are both too abstract for describing services that can be interpreted by Web Services frameworks in a consistent way.

There's a lot of debate in the Web Service community around whether to use a contract-first versus a code-first approach to develop Web Services. One of the common arguments in favor of a contract-first approach is that it facilitates interoperability. Whether that's arguably true, the reality is that just a few mortals know WSDL and XSD well enough to design solid service contracts. Given the complexities of both standards developers often end up designing non-optimal WSDLs and XSDs that are translated into poor service implementations. On the other hand, a code-first approach is more familiar to developers but can produce contracts that aren't interoperable.

Best Practice Recommendation
Some of the most successful Web Service implementations have been designed using a hybrid approach that combines the agility of a code-first approach with the flexibility of a XSD/WSDL-first approach. Following these technique developers can leverage their existing skills on a particular development platform to guarantee an optimal service implementation while the WSDL-XSD experts verify that the contract is suited to meeting the interoperability needs. Figure 1 illustrates this approach.

Multi-Transport Services
SOAP, WSDL, and the different WS-* protocols are transport-agnostic specifications. Theoretically it's possible to host the same service using multiple transports such as HTTP, TCP, JMS, etc. Although this feature is supported by some of the Web Services technology frameworks on the market such as Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) or Apache Axis, only HTTP has been adopted widely enough to be considered for interoperability scenarios. Another factor to consider when implementing multi-transport services in real-world scenarios is that certain transports require a specific behavior of the service. For instance, a Web Service that uses JMS as a transport probably implements one-way, long-running, and asynchronous operations. That behavior is fundamentally different from a Web Service that uses HTTP as a transport on which it makes sense to implement atomic operations using different multiple exchange patterns. Hosting the same Web Services using JMS and HTTP makes little or no sense in most of the scenarios.


More Stories By Jesus Rodriguez

Jesus Rodriguez is a co-founder and CEO of KidoZen, an enterprise mobile-first platform as a service redefining the future of enterprise mobile solutions. He is also the co-founder to Tellago, an award-winning professional services firm focused on big enterprise software trends. Under his leadership, KidoZen and Tellago have been recognized as an innovator in the areas of enterprise software and solutions achieving important awards like the Inc 500, Stevie Awards’ American and International Business Awards.

A software scientist by background, Jesus is an internationally recognized speaker and author with contributions that include hundreds of articles and sessions at industry conferences. He serves as an advisor to several software companies such as Microsoft and Oracle, sits at the board of different technology companies. Jesus is a prolific blogger on all subjects related to software technology and entrepreneurship. You can gain valuable insight on business and software technology through his blogs at http://jrodthoughts.com and http://weblogs.asp.net/gsusx .

More Stories By Javier Mariscal

Javier Mariscal is the President and Founder of TwoConnect, Inc, a highly renowned consulting and systems integration company based in Miami, Florida with subsidiary offices in New York City, and San Francisco. After nearly 15 years, Javier is still mostly responsible for guaranteeing that TwoConnect’s innovative integration solutions deliver real and immediate results to its clients. As an author and frequent speaker on SOA and related technologies, Javier constantly reaffirms the need for “practical SOA” which focuses not on pushing a brand or a platform but on delivering immediate business rewards. Under his leadership, TwoConnect has been the first to market with multiple SOA related products and solutions such as the Web Services Enhancements 3.0 Adapter for Microsoft BizTalk Server and the SQL Server Service Broker Enhancements, both currently in production at companies worldwide. In 2006, TwoConnect announced a new line of products and services under its AdapterWorx brand, which has been hugely successful in accelerating its SOA solutions delivered. Following the success of AdapterWorx and a banner year in 2006 in general, Javier was nominated for Entrepreneur of the Year by Hispanic Business Magazine.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@MicroservicesExpo Stories
identify the sources of event storms and performance anomalies will require automated, real-time root-cause analysis. I think Enterprise Management Associates said it well: “The data and metrics collected at instrumentation points across the application ecosystem are essential to performance monitoring and root cause analysis. However, analytics capable of transforming data and metrics into an application-focused report or dashboards are what separates actual application monitoring from relat...
While some developers care passionately about how data centers and clouds are architected, for most, it is only the end result that matters. To the majority of companies, technology exists to solve a business problem, and only delivers value when it is solving that problem. 2017 brings the mainstream adoption of containers for production workloads. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ben McCormack, VP of Operations at Evernote, discussed how data centers of the future will be managed, how the p...
DevOps teams have more on their plate than ever. As infrastructure needs grow, so does the time required to ensure that everything's running smoothly. This makes automation crucial - especially in the server and network monitoring world. Server monitoring tools can save teams time by automating server management and providing real-time performance updates. As budgets reset for the New Year, there is no better time to implement a new server monitoring tool (or re-evaluate your current solution)....
The benefits of automation are well documented; it increases productivity, cuts cost and minimizes errors. It eliminates repetitive manual tasks, freeing us up to be more innovative. By that logic, surely, we should automate everything possible, right? So, is attempting to automate everything a sensible - even feasible - goal? In a word: no. Consider this your short guide as to what to automate and what not to automate.
Cavirin Systems has just announced C2, a SaaS offering designed to bring continuous security assessment and remediation to hybrid environments, containers, and data centers. Cavirin C2 is deployed within Amazon Web Services (AWS) and features a flexible licensing model for easy scalability and clear pay-as-you-go pricing. Although native to AWS, it also supports assessment and remediation of virtual or container instances within Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), or on-premise. By dr...
Let's do a visualization exercise. Imagine it's December 31, 2018, and you're ringing in the New Year with your friends and family. You think back on everything that you accomplished in the last year: your company's revenue is through the roof thanks to the success of your product, and you were promoted to Lead Developer. 2019 is poised to be an even bigger year for your company because you have the tools and insight to scale as quickly as demand requires. You're a happy human, and it's not just...
"Opsani helps the enterprise adopt containers, help them move their infrastructure into this modern world of DevOps, accelerate the delivery of new features into production, and really get them going on the container path," explained Ross Schibler, CEO of Opsani, and Peter Nickolov, CTO of Opsani, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Enterprises are adopting Kubernetes to accelerate the development and the delivery of cloud-native applications. However, sharing a Kubernetes cluster between members of the same team can be challenging. And, sharing clusters across multiple teams is even harder. Kubernetes offers several constructs to help implement segmentation and isolation. However, these primitives can be complex to understand and apply. As a result, it’s becoming common for enterprises to end up with several clusters. Thi...
It’s “time to move on from DevOps and continuous delivery.” This was the provocative title of a recent article in ZDNet, in which Kelsey Hightower, staff developer advocate at Google Cloud Platform, suggested that “software shops should have put these concepts into action years ago.” Reading articles like this or listening to talks at most DevOps conferences might make you think that we’re entering a post-DevOps world. But vast numbers of organizations still struggle to start and drive transfo...
The nature of test environments is inherently temporary—you set up an environment, run through an automated test suite, and then tear down the environment. If you can reduce the cycle time for this process down to hours or minutes, then you may be able to cut your test environment budgets considerably. The impact of cloud adoption on test environments is a valuable advancement in both cost savings and agility. The on-demand model takes advantage of public cloud APIs requiring only payment for t...
High-velocity engineering teams are applying not only continuous delivery processes, but also lessons in experimentation from established leaders like Amazon, Netflix, and Facebook. These companies have made experimentation a foundation for their release processes, allowing them to try out major feature releases and redesigns within smaller groups before making them broadly available. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Brian Lucas, Senior Staff Engineer at Optimizely, discussed how by using ne...
While we understand Agile as a means to accelerate innovation, manage uncertainty and cope with ambiguity, many are inclined to think that it conflicts with the objectives of traditional engineering projects, such as building a highway, skyscraper or power plant. These are plan-driven and predictive projects that seek to avoid any uncertainty. This type of thinking, however, is short-sighted. Agile approaches are valuable in controlling uncertainty because they constrain the complexity that ste...
"We're developing a software that is based on the cloud environment and we are providing those services to corporations and the general public," explained Seungmin Kim, CEO/CTO of SM Systems Inc., in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The cloud revolution in enterprises has very clearly crossed the phase of proof-of-concepts into a truly mainstream adoption. One of most popular enterprise-wide initiatives currently going on are “cloud migration” programs of some kind or another. Finding business value for these programs is not hard to fathom – they include hyperelasticity in infrastructure consumption, subscription based models, and agility derived from rapid speed of deployment of applications. These factors will continue to...
"This all sounds great. But it's just not realistic." This is what a group of five senior IT executives told me during a workshop I held not long ago. We were working through an exercise on the organizational characteristics necessary to successfully execute a digital transformation, and the group was doing their ‘readout.' The executives loved everything we discussed and agreed that if such an environment existed, it would make transformation much easier. They just didn't believe it was reali...
"CA has been doing a lot of things in the area of DevOps. Now we have a complete set of tool sets in order to enable customers to go all the way from planning to development to testing down to release into the operations," explained Aruna Ravichandran, Vice President of Global Marketing and Strategy at CA Technologies, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
We just came off of a review of a product that handles both containers and virtual machines in the same interface. Under the covers, implementation of containers defaults to LXC, though recently Docker support was added. When reading online, or searching for information, increasingly we see “Container Management” products listed as competitors to Docker, when in reality things like Rocket, LXC/LXD, and Virtualization are Dockers competitors. After doing some looking around, we have decided tha...
Agile has finally jumped the technology shark, expanding outside the software world. Enterprises are now increasingly adopting Agile practices across their organizations in order to successfully navigate the disruptive waters that threaten to drown them. In our quest for establishing change as a core competency in our organizations, this business-centric notion of Agile is an essential component of Agile Digital Transformation. In the years since the publication of the Agile Manifesto, the conn...
"Codigm is based on the cloud and we are here to explore marketing opportunities in America. Our mission is to make an ecosystem of the SW environment that anyone can understand, learn, teach, and develop the SW on the cloud," explained Sung Tae Ryu, CEO of Codigm, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Many enterprise and government IT organizations are realizing the benefits of cloud computing by extending IT delivery and management processes across private and public cloud services. But they are often challenged with balancing the need for centralized cloud governance without stifling user-driven innovation. This strategy requires an approach that fundamentally reshapes how IT is delivered today, shifting the focus from infrastructure to services aggregation, and mixing and matching the bes...