Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Cynthia Dunlop, Karyn Jeffery, Reinhard Brandstädter, Elizabeth White, Thanh Tran

Related Topics: Microservices Expo, Industrial IoT

Microservices Expo: Article

Long-Running Transactions in SOA

Transaction management in long running service based activities

Most organizations that have tried have been successful in implementing a pliable Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm. Analysts have come out with strategies to translate existing applications into SOA-compliant systems using a staggered approach. The rewards reaped come in the form of low-cost maintenance and agility in their business, along with reusable and self-contained services. But there are still challenges in this form of service-based architecture and solutions need to be devised.

One of the biggest hurdles has been coordinating technology-agnostic services into a single long-running unit of work that produces predictable results. The transactions running across multiple services over multiple domains need to be synchronized to maintain business integrity. Currently organizations depend on proprietary solutions to coordinate transactions for data consistency. This article will walk you through the definition of long-running transaction in SOA and its challenges then talk about the various approaches to resolving the issue while retaining the characteristics of a service-based architecture.

ACID Applications
Applications utilize multiple services across different modules or layers to serve a particular business need. For example, security authentication, service information, EIS information, updating services need to coordinate in a business unit termed a transaction thatcomprehends data consistency and business integrity in an organization.

Transactions are a set of operations that must be executed entirely or not at all. The fault-tolerance mechanism of managing transactions is to maintain the so-called ACID properties: A - Atomicity (all or none), C - Consistency (the resource must start and end in a consistent state), I - Isolation (make the transactions appear isolated from all the other operations) and D - Durability (once notified, the transaction will persist). ACID provides concurrency in operations and retains data integrity.

ACID properties are easier to implement on transactions that run only a short time because during a transaction the resources are held in a locked state. Transactions that run for a long time can't afford to lock up resources. Till date, an ACID transaction assumes closely coupled systems that aren't an SOA-mandated environment. So the ACID properties in a long-running activity need to be applied so that locking doesn't occur, or if it does, then the duration of the locking is as short as possible.

Long-Running Transactions in Service-Crowded Systems
To understand the concept of a long-running transaction, we need to look first into the various lifetimes of a transaction. A transaction lifetime can be defined as the minimum amount of time a transaction is kept open. This time period can be anywhere from a few seconds to several hours. A transaction with a short lifetime can begin and end in a matter of seconds, while a long-running transaction can be alive for minutes, hours, even days depending upon the underlying business requirements and implementation. Transactions with a short lifetime are easy to handle since the resources they use can be locked for the time required by maintaining the ACID properties. But the same strategy can't be applied to long-running transactions. Locking up resources for a long time can seriously hamper the application's performance bringing in unnecessary deadlock situations and long wait-times. Any transaction left in an open state for an indefinite amount of time qualifies as a long-running transaction.

The following scenarios make long-running transactions possible:

  1. A transaction with lots of database queries
  2. B2B transactions
  3. Batch processes
  4. Pseudo-Asynchronous activities within a transaction
In a long running transaction with multiple queries made to the database, the failure of any single query would result in a transaction failure that requires rolling back completely to the previously saved safe state of the database. The scenario might be across different data sources across different administrative domains.

Batch processes run for long periods of time, usually for hours. Regularly backing up sensitive data is an example. In most cases, batch processes only involve reading data and hence not many transactional issues are encountered. But in certain cases these long batch processes can include modifying the data. A failure during that operation would require an equally long rollback process.

Pseudo-asynchronous activities are used in concurrent activities but the transactions are resumed at some kind of notification. Such operations can be trivial to handle as the control is passed on completely and there is a complex or no way back to reach the sender once the activity is completed. This results in a complex scenario where an independent or intelligently handled rollback needs to be initiated on the source.

In a SOA each functionality is separated as a service. So, a certain application may use many services to provide a defined functionality. The principles of SOA define services as separate platform- and system-independent entities - each capable of functioning on their own, thus providing reusability and interoperability across disparate platforms.

A long-running transaction creates a number of problems in a SOA architecture. As long as a transaction is limited to a closed environment, catching faults or exceptions and triggering the appropriate rollback mechanism can easily be defined in the underlying application architecture. For example, a transaction involving a database as a resource would already have mechanisms defined in it to handle errors and do rollbacks. Even in a distributed database environment these things can be taken care of. Imagine the same situation in an open SOA scenario where each transactional query is executed on an altogether different platform or system. How a rollback would be implemented in such a case is just one of the immediate questions that comes to mind.

Let's consider a scenario where the transaction involves the participation of three different services - each performing a particular operation. Only if all three operations are successful would the transaction be deemed a success. Any other outcome would result in the transaction being marked as a failure. Then, if and when the transaction fails, appropriate recovery measures have to be implemented. And to top it off, we can lock a resource only for the time when the service local to the resource is operating.

Troubles Within
Let's look into the problems encountered with long-running transactions in SOA. They can be referred to as failure cases:

  1. The participation of multiple services results in multiple endpoints being invoked during one cycle of the transaction. Any of these services can be down at the instance when the transaction is in process.
  2. SOA boasts of loosely coupled systems. Maintaining transactions is only possible in closely coupled systems.
  3. The services involved can be based on any platform. Because of the disparity among the underlying implementation of the services, a context can't be deployed across the services to manage the transactions.
  4. The current status in the flow of the transaction can't be known at a given instance.
  5. Ifasynchronous services are involved in the transaction they can't be reached back, unless the service information is explicitly passed on.
  6. Resources can't be kept in a locked state for long periods of time. To free a resource once the service is done with it, it must release it. Doing this can cause a problem later on if the service fails and a rollback is issued throughout all the services.
  7. Alternate methods need to be devised to perform the appropriate recovery operations. In most cases these methods are either platform-specific or too dependent on the underlying business process.
Viable Methodologies
Any methodology that tries to implement transaction management for a long-running transaction scenario in a SOA needs to make sure to:
  1. Uniquely identify a transaction across the various participating services
  2. Guarantee that the data is delivered and the notifications are sent
  3. Some compensation must be provided in case something goes wrong during the transaction
  4. Errors in asynchronous services have to be addressed
Keeping these points in mind, the following are some ways to manage long-running transactions in SOA:
  1. A compensation methodology
  2. Transaction coordinator
Methodology 1: Compensation
In an ideal situation any changes done during a long-running transaction must be reverted back to the original content in case there's a failure somewhere else along the flow of the transaction. This is precisely what happens in a closed environment and is known as a rollback. In a SOA architecture, a situation might arise where a rollback isn't an option. In that case, instead of a rollback, compensation is provided. For example, in WS choreography, the self-reliant services pass control messages back and forth to notify the participating services of a rollback operation.

Compensation may be defined as the most logical change applied to the resource to maintain data consistency and integrity. How it's constructed depends on the governing business rules and underlying technical implementation of the services. In certain cases, compensation can include a rollback. In the example above, if the transaction fails at the third service (the transaction is uniquely identified by an id throughout its lifetime), we need to perform a compensatory operation at the previous service to negate the effect caused by the transaction. So, if the second service sent out an e-mail announcing that it has implemented the changes, a compensatory operation would be to send another e-mail announcing the failure of the transaction and that the changes have been undone. A synchronous process showcasing the scenario is illustrated in Figure 1.

But what if the services participating in the process are asynchronous, as one would expect in a long-running transaction? One way would be to save states and service information.

Methodology 2: Transaction Coordinator
A more appropriate solution would be to orchestrate the process using a transaction manager or process coordinator. Instead of inter-service communication, the services would be answerable to the coordinator, which in turn would handle all the transaction and compensation scenarios. Once again the transaction will be uniquely identified throughout the transaction cycle by an id. This would help the coordinator perform compensatory operations on the required set of data. The coordinator can manage the service information as well. This would solve any issues with asynchronous services. Figure 2 illustrates the coordinator service. This kind of methodology is used mostly in service orchestration-type applications and is a more centralized approach unlike methodology 1.

Case study - Money Transfer Scenario
Consider a money transfer scenario (Figure 4) where a complete transaction process involves five different services. All five services are separated by virtue of both system and the language of implementation.

The first service, the initiation service, is exposed to the client to pick up the user input. It validates the necessary input parameters and processes the transaction by sequentially executing the credit service and the debit service. Then the system notifies the stakeholder and the internal logs for auditing.

With no transaction context involved in this processing, the services are executed independently with no knowledge of the member service status. There's no way for the executed services to rollback and for specific reasons:

  1. Service status isn't shared
  2. Non-availability of co-ordination federation in the processing
  3. Compensation services for revoking the services
Let's take one of the approaches and bridge the gaps. The solution is to have a coordinator orchestrating though the services and managing the transaction context. The coordinator invariably stores the status of the services and maintains the transaction supporting the ACID properties.

The coordinator receives the input and generates an id to uniquely identify the transaction. An acknowledgement is sent to the initiation service as RECEIVED. The initiation service notifies the client about the start of the process and provides the unique transaction id. The client can use this transaction id to monitor and track the transaction. The initiation service is now ready to take further client input. The coordinator maintains a log to record each operation it performs. The log is created against the transaction id.

After generating the id for the transaction, the coordinator calls the external service of the bank, which accepts the money. This credit service takes the necessary input and starts updating the records in the database. Depending upon the style of the compensation, state information is saved before the update process initiates. Once the update takes place successfully, an acknowledgement to the coordinator is sent. (Figure 3)

The coordinator then logs the changes and proceeds to call the debit service. The debit service makes the necessary changes to the local database to reflect the debit. The debit process follows the same pattern as the credit process. On successful operation, a DEBITED acknowledgement is sent to the coordinator. The coordinator notifies each service involved of successful individual transactions at each step by means enacts the 2PC execution. When there's a failure, the coordinator runs the compensation service for each activity.

Conclusion
The long-running transaction is designed specifically for business interactions that take a long time. The intention is to tie the logical single business-to-business unit of work across heterogeneous domains. Each methodology depends on the architecture of the system and the existing assets in the organization. Technical analysts need to differentiate such special transaction in the SOA study and deal with them through special defined methodologies.

References
1.  William Cox. "Transactional Web Services."
http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2004/01/cox.html

2.  Pat Helland. "Why I hate the phrase Long running Transactions..."
http://blogs.msdn.com/pathelland/archive/2004/08/12/213552.aspx

3.  Wikipedia Atomic Transactions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_transaction
Database Transactions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_transaction
Two-phase commit protocol:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2-phase_commit
ACID properties:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACID

More Stories By Anshuk Pal Chaudhari

The authors are interning and/or working as part of the Web Services COE (Center of Excellence) for Infosys Technologies, a global IT consulting firm, and have substantial experience in publishing papers, presenting papers at conferences, and defining standards for SOA and Web services. The Web Services COE specializes in SOA, Web services, and other related technologies.

More Stories By Bijoy Majumdar

Bijoy Majumdar is a member of the Web Services COE (Center of Excellence) for Infosys Technologies, a global IT consulting firm, and has substantial experience in publishing papers, presenting papers at conferences, and defining standards for SOA and Web services. Prior to Infosys, Bijoy Majumdar worked as an IT Analyst, and had been a member of the GE Center of Excellence (e-center) under the E-Business Practice of Tata Consultancy Services.

More Stories By Sunny Saxena

Sunny Saxena currently works with the Web Services Centre of Excellence in SETLabs, the technology research division at Infosys Technologies, India. His interests range from Web service security platforms to aspect-oriented development models.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@MicroservicesExpo Stories
Agile teams report the lowest rate of measuring non-functional requirements. What does this mean for the evolution of quality in this era of Continuous Everything? To explore how the rise of SDLC acceleration trends such as Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery are impacting software quality, Parasoft conducted a survey about measuring and monitoring non-functional requirements (NFRs). Here's a glimpse at what we discovered and what it means for the evolution of quality in this era of Continuo...
In the rush to compete in the digital age, a successful digital transformation is essential, but many organizations are setting themselves up for failure. There’s a common misconception that the process is just about technology, but it’s not. It’s about your business. It shouldn’t be treated as an isolated IT project; it should be driven by business needs with the committed involvement of a range of stakeholders.
Just last week a senior Hybris consultant shared the story of a customer engagement on which he was working. This customer had problems, serious problems. We’re talking about response times far beyond the most liberal acceptable standard. They were unable to solve the issue in their eCommerce platform – specifically Hybris. Although the eCommerce project was delivered by a system integrator / implementation partner, the vendor still gets involved when things go really wrong. After all, the vendo...
SYS-CON Events announced today that EastBanc Technologies will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. EastBanc Technologies has been working at the frontier of technology since 1999. Today, the firm provides full-lifecycle software development delivering flexible technology solutions that seamlessly integrate with existing systems – whether on premise or cloud. EastBanc Technologies partners with p...
While there has been much ado about interoperability, there are still no real solutions, same as last year and the year before that. The large EHR vendors who continue to dominate the market still maintain that interoperability is all but solved, still can't connect EHRs across the continuum causing frustration by providers and a disservice to patients. The ONC pays lip service to the problem, but that is about it. It is time for the healthcare industry to consider alternatives like middleware w...
Our CTO, Anders Wallgren, recently sat down to take part in the “B2B Nation: IT” podcast — the series dedicated to serving the IT professional community with expert opinions and advice on the world of information technology. Listen to the great conversation, where Anders shares his thoughts on DevOps lessons from large enterprises, the growth of microservices and containers, and more.
SYS-CON Events announced today that AppNeta, the leader in performance insight for business-critical web applications, will exhibit and present at SYS-CON's @DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo New York, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. AppNeta is the only application performance monitoring (APM) company to provide solutions for all applications – applications you develop internally, business-critical SaaS applications you use and the networks that deli...
SYS-CON Events announced today the Docker Meets Kubernetes – Intro into the Kubernetes World, being held June 9, 2016, in conjunction with 18th Cloud Expo | @ThingsExpo, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Register for 'Docker Meets Kubernetes Workshop' Here! This workshop led by Sebastian Scheele, co-founder of Loodse, introduces participants to Kubernetes (container orchestration). Through a combination of instructor-led presentations, demonstrations, and hands-on labs, participants learn ...
SYS-CON Events announced today the How to Create Angular 2 Clients for the Cloud Workshop, being held June 7, 2016, in conjunction with 18th Cloud Expo | @ThingsExpo, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Angular 2 is a complete re-write of the popular framework AngularJS. Programming in Angular 2 is greatly simplified. Now it’s a component-based well-performing framework. The immersive one-day workshop led by Yakov Fain, a Java Champion and a co-founder of the IT consultancy Farata Systems and...
Join us at Cloud Expo | @ThingsExpo 2016 – June 7-9 at the Javits Center in New York City and November 1-3 at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA – and deliver your unique message in a way that is striking and unforgettable by taking advantage of SYS-CON's unmatched high-impact, result-driven event / media packages.
The initial debate is over: Any enterprise with a serious commitment to IT is migrating to the cloud. But things are not so simple. There is a complex mix of on-premises, colocated, and public-cloud deployments. In this power panel at 18th Cloud Expo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists will look at the present state of cloud from the C-level view, and how great companies and rock star executives can use cloud computing to meet their most ambitious and disruptive business ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that BMC Software has been named "Siver Sponsor" of SYS-CON's 18th Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7-9, 2015 at the Javits Center in New York, New York. BMC is a global leader in innovative software solutions that help businesses transform into digital enterprises for the ultimate competitive advantage. BMC Digital Enterprise Management is a set of innovative IT solutions designed to make digital business fast, seamless, and optimized from mainframe to mo...
Earlier this week, we hosted a Continuous Discussion (#c9d9) on Continuous Delivery (CD) automation and orchestration, featuring expert panelists Dondee Tan, Test Architect at Alaska Air, Taco Bakker, a LEAN Six Sigma black belt focusing on CD, and our own Sam Fell and Anders Wallgren. During this episode, we discussed the differences between CD automation and orchestration, their challenges with setting up CD pipelines and some of the common chokepoints, as well as some best practices and tips...
SoftLayer operates a global cloud infrastructure platform built for Internet scale. With a global footprint of data centers and network points of presence, SoftLayer provides infrastructure as a service to leading-edge customers ranging from Web startups to global enterprises. SoftLayer's modular architecture, full-featured API, and sophisticated automation provide unparalleled performance and control. Its flexible unified platform seamlessly spans physical and virtual devices linked via a world...
Automation is a critical component of DevOps and Continuous Delivery. This morning on #c9d9 we discussed CD Automation and how you can apply Automation to accelerate release cycles, improve quality, safety and governance? What is the difference between Automation and Orchestration? Where should you begin your journey to introduce both?
When I talk about driving innovation with self-organizing teams, I emphasize that such self-organization includes expecting the participants to organize their own teams, give themselves their own goals, and determine for themselves how to measure their success. In contrast, the definition of skunkworks points out that members of such teams are “usually specially selected.” Good thing he added the word usually – because specially selecting such teams throws a wrench in the entire works, limiting...
SYS-CON Events announced today TechTarget has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7–9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. TechTarget is the Web’s leading destination for serious technology buyers researching and making enterprise technology decisions. Its extensive global networ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Commvault, a global leader in enterprise data protection and information management, has been named “Bronze Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7–9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 19th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Commvault is a leading provider of data protection and information management...
As AT&Ts VP of Domain 2.0 architecture writes one aspect of their Domain 2.0 strategy is a goal to embrace a Microservices Application Architecture. One page 9 they describe how these envisage them fitting into the ECOMP architecture: "The initial steps of the recipes include a homing and placement task using constraints specified in the requests. ‘Homing and Placement' are micro-services involving orchestration, inventory, and controllers responsible for infrastructure, network, and applicati...
Many banks and financial institutions are experimenting with containers in development environments, but when will they move into production? Containers are seen as the key to achieving the ultimate in information technology flexibility and agility. Containers work on both public and private clouds, and make it easy to build and deploy applications. The challenge for regulated industries is the cost and complexity of container security compliance. VM security compliance is already challenging, ...