|By Business Wire||
|May 13, 2014 07:04 AM EDT||
USA Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: USAT) (“USAT”), a leader of wireless, cashless payment and M2M telemetry solutions for small-ticket, self-serve retailing industries, today reported results for the third fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014.
Highlights for the third quarter included:
- GAAP net income of $26.9 million which included $26.7 million related to the partial recognition of a deferred tax asset. Non-GAAP net income was $321,526;
- Net earnings per common share of $0.75, which included $0.75 per share related to the partial recognition of a deferred tax asset. Non-GAAP net loss per common share was $0.00;
- Total revenues of $10.4 million; up 16% from the prior year;
- License and transaction fee revenue of $9.0 million, an increase of 19% over the prior year and representing 86% of total revenues; and
- Adjusted EBITDA of $1.8 million, up 9% from the prior year.
In addition, USAT achieved a record number of new connections to its cashless payment and M2M telemetry service, ePort Connect®, approximately 22,000, in the third quarter. Net new connections for the third quarter totaled approximately 20,000, a 100% increase from 10,000 net new connections for the third quarter of the prior year. Total connections to USAT’s cashless payment and M2M telemetry service, ePort Connect®, were 244,000 as of March 31, 2014, a 24% increase from March 31, 2013.
USAT also continued to demonstrate rapid growth in the number of customers using its ePort Connect service across various segments of the self-serve retail market including vending, commercial laundry, amusement/arcade, taxi and transportation, kiosk and mobile applications. During the third quarter, USAT added 575 new customers to its ePort Connect service, for 6,650 total customers as of March 31, 2014. For the three years ended March 31, 2014, the ePort Connect customer base has grown by a compound annual growth rate of 58%.
“Our results for the third quarter reflect assertive strategies directed toward growing market share, cashless adoption and long-term customer relationships for USAT in this emerging market,” said Stephen P. Herbert, USAT’s chairman and chief executive officer. “Connections were strong and we have a very encouraging pipeline of connections going into our fourth fiscal quarter. We are also looking forward to the additional license and transaction fee revenues associated with a number of new connections achieved through March that had not fully materialized as of quarter end—all factors that we believe bode well for future revenue growth and cash generation.
“We were particularly excited to be able to recognize a deferred tax asset related to our net loss carryovers in the third quarter. This is another important milestone for USAT that we believe speaks to, among other things, the growing strength of our recurring revenue model and the strategies we have put in place to attract new customers and connections to our service,” continued Herbert.
“During the third quarter, we continued to leverage our strong foothold in vending by working with those customers to drive cashless payment into a greater percentage of their installed base of machines,” said Herbert. “Within this same market segment, we also took important steps to extend our value proposition to the other POS touchpoints within a full-service food and beverage operation that can benefit from our ePort Connect service. Beyond vending, third quarter successes also included execution in strategies designed to leverage ePort Connect in adjacent markets, such as commercial laundry and taxi and transportation.”
Third quarter strategic highlights included:
- Introduction of Integrated Payment Services, an evolution of ePort Connect that is designed to support multiple aspects of a full-service food and beverage operation—vending, micro-markets, dining services, distribution/drop off services and loyalty—under the ePort Connect umbrella;
- A new, exclusive agreement with The Pepi Companies, that represented USAT’s first customer under the new Integrated Payment Services model. The agreement substantially expands The Pepi Companies’ relationship with USAT by leveraging USAT products, services and add-on integration capabilities across other segments of its business;
- Continued expansion of third party technologies supported on ePort Connect that further add to the benefits and convenience of doing business with USAT. Examples include AirVend’s android-based interactive touchscreen point-of-sale device, and micro-market support for Revive Self Checkout and Breakroom Provisions;
- Strong execution in taxi and transportation with 2,000 connections achieved in the quarter as well as additional orders for future connections. USAT offers simplified service-only integration to ePort Connect, as well as ePort GO™ USAT’s one-stop offering for the taxi and transportation market; and
- Ongoing enhancements to ePort Connect in the area of consumer engagement that continue to differentiate USAT among its peers. Examples include integration of USAT’s MORE. loyalty and prepaid program across micro-market and other supported technologies as well as the introduction of the MORE. consumer app with eBeacon™ mobile payment powered by Bluetooth low energy "BLE" technology.
Third Quarter Results
Revenues of $10.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 grew by 16% from the same period a year ago. Revenue from license and transaction fees, driven by net connections to USAT’s ePort Connect service through monthly service fees, rental program fees and transaction processing fees, represented 86% of revenues in the third quarter and grew by 19% compared to the same quarter in the prior year.
Gross profit of $4.0 million increased by 9% for the third quarter, from $3.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross profit margin was 38.3%, down from 41.0% for the same period in the prior year, due primarily to lower gross margins associated with license and transaction fees in the quarter, which resulted from deactivations over the last year as well as certain marketing programs, and the timing of those programs, that are designed to further accelerate cashless adoption.
Operating expenses of $3.6 million in the third quarter grew from $3.3 million for the same period in fiscal 2013, largely due to additional investments in sales and marketing during fiscal 2014. Operating income was $365,535 and $350,219 for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, respectively.
GAAP net income for the third quarter was $26.9 million compared to a GAAP net loss of ($1.0) million for the third quarter of the prior year. In the third quarter, USAT recognized a deferred tax asset of $26.7 million due to reduction of the valuation allowance established for operating loss carryovers. Under GAAP, such deferred tax assets are recognized when management has determined that it is more likely than not that the operating loss carryovers would be utilized in future periods.
Non-GAAP net income, which excludes the deferred tax benefit as well as the impact of the fair value of warrant adjustment, was $321,526 for the third quarter compared to $293,011 for the third quarter in the prior year (see non-GAAP Reconciliation table).
After preferred dividends, net earnings per common share was $0.75 for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to a net loss per common share of ($0.04) for the third quarter of fiscal 2013. On a non-GAAP basis, net loss per common share was $0.00 for the both the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013.
Cash and cash equivalents stood at approximately $6.6 million as of March 31, 2014, up from $3.9 million as of March 31, 2013.
“Our strategies are delivering important results in this emerging market—more customers, more connections to our service and continued market differentiation,” said Herbert. “We are encouraged by the higher average rate of new connections achieved for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 compared to last year and, for the fourth quarter, anticipate continued progress in driving revenue growth and operating margin expansion.”
Webcast and Conference Call
USA Technologies will conduct a conference call and webcast at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 13, 2014. USA Technologies invites all interested parties to listen to the live webcast of the conference call, accessible on the Investor Relations section of USA Technologies’ website. The webcast will be archived on the website within two hours of the live call. It will remain available for approximately 90 days. Interested parties unable to access the webcast may also participate by calling (866) 393-1608 or, if an international caller, (224) 357-2194. A replay of the call, available until midnight on May 16, 2014, can be accessed by calling (855) 859-2056; Conference ID#29061568, (toll free).
About USA Technologies:
USA Technologies is a leader of wireless, cashless payment and M2M telemetry solutions for small-ticket, self-serve retailing industries. ePort Connect® is the company’s flagship service platform, a PCI-compliant, end-to-end suite of cashless payment and telemetry services specially tailored to fit the needs of small ticket, self-service retailing industries. USA Technologies also provides a broad line of cashless acceptance technologies including its NFC-ready ePort® G-series, ePort Mobile™-for customers on the go, and QuickConnect, an API Web service for developers. USA Technologies has been granted 87 patents and has agreements with Verizon, Visa, Elavon and customers such as Compass, Crane, AMI Entertainment and others. Visit the website at www.usatech.com.
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release, including without limitation the business strategy and the plans and objectives of USAT's management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this release, words such as "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend", and similar expressions, as they relate to USAT or its management, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of USAT's management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to USAT's management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to, the ability of management to accurately predict or forecast future earnings or taxable income of USAT; the incurrence by us of any unanticipated or unusual non-operational expenses which would require us to divert our cash resources from achieving our business plan; the ability of USAT to retain key customers from whom a significant portion of its revenues is derived; the ability of USAT to compete with its competitors to obtain market share; whether USAT's customers continue to utilize USAT's transaction processing and related services, as our customer agreements are generally cancelable by the customer on thirty to sixty days' notice; the ability of USAT to obtain widespread commercial acceptance of it products; the ability of USAT to raise funds in the future through the sales of securities or debt financings in order to sustain its operations if an unexpected or unusual non-operational event would occur; the ability of USAT to use available data to predict future market conditions, consumer behavior and any level of cashless usage; the ability of USAT to efficiently and securely integrate cashless payment with new machine technologies; whether any patents issued to USAT will provide USAT with any competitive advantages or adequate protection for its products, or would be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by others; the ability of USAT to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others; and whether USAT's existing or anticipated customers purchase, rent or utilize ePort devices or our other products or services in the future at levels currently anticipated by USAT. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this release speaks only as of the date of this release. Unless required by law, USAT does not undertake to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
|USA Technologies, Inc.|
|Consolidated Statements of Operations|
|Three months ended||Nine months ended|
|March 31,||March 31,|
|License and transaction fees||$||8,999,689||$||7,562,589||$||26,177,818||$||21,872,187|
|Cost of services||5,785,721||4,525,244||16,690,569||13,080,816|
|Cost of equipment||660,423||774,221||3,036,243||2,748,785|
|Selling, general and administrative||3,479,300||3,003,231||9,968,212||8,918,030|
|Depreciation and amortization||152,953||327,889||438,337||1,004,134|
|Total operating expenses||3,632,253||3,331,120||10,406,549||9,922,164|
|Other income (expense):|
|Change in fair value of warrant liabilities||(168,897)||(1,308,954)||12,304||(1,249,456)|
|Total other expense, net||(226,729)||(1,359,251)||(148,669)||(1,305,948)|
|Income (loss) before benefit (provision) for income taxes||138,806||(1,009,032)||855,474||(802,310)|
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes||26,727,720||(6,911)||26,713,897||(20,734)|
|Net Income (loss)||26,866,526||(1,015,943)||27,569,371||(823,044)|
|Cumulative preferred dividends||(332,226)||(332,226)||(664,452)||(664,452)|
|Net income (loss) applicable to common shares||$||26,534,300||$||(1,348,169)||$||26,904,919||$||(1,487,496)|
|Net earnings (loss) per common share (basic and diluted)||$||0.75||$||(0.04)||$||0.78||$||(0.05)|
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)||35,504,911||32,821,345||34,313,396||32,690,374|
|USA Technologies, Inc.|
|Consolidated Balance Sheets|
|March 31,||June 30,|
|Cash and cash equivalents||$||6,577,117||$||5,981,000|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $47,000 and $18,000, respectively
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||488,146||184,336|
|Deferred income taxes||581,982||-|
|Total current assets||11,240,434||10,726,079|
|Finance receivables, less current portion||325,812||408,674|
|Property and equipment, net||20,755,507||17,240,065|
|Deferred income taxes||26,127,191||-|
|Liabilities and shareholders’ equity|
|Line of credit||4,000,000||3,000,000|
|Current obligations under long-term debt||249,915||247,152|
|Income taxes payable||35,521||-|
|Total current liabilities||11,967,321||12,016,583|
|Long-term debt, less current portion||316,871||122,754|
|Accrued expenses, less current portion||224,312||366,785|
|Deferred tax liabilities||-||40,245|
|Total long-term liabilities||1,179,517||1,180,422|
|Commitments and contingencies|
|Preferred stock, no par value:|
Authorized shares- 1,800,000 Series A convertible preferred- Authorized shares- 900,000 Issued and outstanding shares- 442,968 (liquidation preference of $16,690,456 and $16,026,004, respectively)
Common stock, no par value: Authorized shares- 640,000,000 Issued and outstanding shares- 35,496,570 and 33,284,232, respectively
|Total shareholders’ equity||53,484,291||23,379,191|
|Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity||$||66,631,129||$||36,576,196|
|USA Technologies, Inc.|
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows|
|Three months ended||Nine months ended|
|March 31,||March 31,|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943)||$||27,569,371||$||(823,044)|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Charges incurred in connection with the vesting and issuance of common stock for employee and director compensation
|(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment||(2,431)||(14,815)||7,053||(18,415)|
|Non-cash interest and amortization of debt discount||-||26,934||2,095||26,934|
|Bad debt expense (recoveries), net||(11,277)||(1,599)||66,773||7,459|
|Change in fair value of warrant liabilities||168,897||1,308,954||(12,304)||1,249,456|
|Deferred income taxes, net||(26,727,720)||6,911||(26,713,897)||20,734|
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:|
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||52,483||59,841||(62,503)||51,730|
|Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities||2,162,782||(217,437)||4,817,958||2,382,748|
|Purchase of property and equipment||(35,134)||(31,413)||(60,361)||(81,691)|
|Purchase of property for rental program||(2,643,439)||(1,778,344)||(7,211,661)||(6,320,514)|
|Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment||5,513||18,908||30,375||18,908|
|Net cash used in investing activities||(2,673,060)||(1,790,849)||(7,241,647)||(6,383,297)|
Net proceeds from the exercise of common stock warrants and the retirement of common stock
|Proceeds from line of credit||-||1,000,000||1,000,000||2,000,000|
|Repayment of long-term debt||(89,366)||(164,363)||(267,043)||(465,084)|
|Net cash provided by financing activities||432,396||910,477||3,019,806||1,522,441|
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents||(77,882)||(1,097,809)||596,117||(2,478,108)|
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period||6,654,999||5,046,346||5,981,000||6,426,645|
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period||$||6,577,117||$||3,948,537||$||6,577,117||$||3,948,537|
|Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:|
|Cash paid for interest||$||59,399||$||32,551||$||189,203||$||84,220|
|Depreciation expense allocated to cost of sales||$||1,260,568||$||861,321||$||3,493,726||$||2,294,862|
|Reclass of rental program property to inventory, net||$||13,686||$||2,296||$||26,803||$||11,923|
|Prepaid items financed with debt||$||144,312||$||2,340||$||246,162||$||130,402|
|Prepaid interest from issuance of warrants for debt costs||$||-||$||55,962||$||-||$||55,962|
|Equipment and software acquired under capital lease||$||195,725||$||80,883||$||217,761||$||80,883|
|Disposal of property and equipment||$||15,141||$||7,700||$||233,857||$||7,700|
Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This press release includes the following measures defined as non-GAAP financial measures by the Securities and Exchange Commission: adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP net income (loss), non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per common share. The presentation of these additional financial measures are not intended to be considered in isolation from, or superior to, or as a substitute for the financial measures prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), including the net income or net loss of USAT or net cash used in operating activities. Management recognizes that non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the items associated with USAT’s net income or net loss as determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures are not required by or defined under GAAP and may be materially different from the non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. USAT has provided reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
As used herein, non-GAAP net income (loss) represents GAAP net income (loss) excluding any benefit from reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance or adjustment for fair value of warrant liabilities. As used herein, non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing non-GAAP net income (loss) applicable to common shares by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Management believes that non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per common share are important measures of USAT’s business. Management uses the aforementioned non-GAAP measures to monitor and evaluate ongoing operating results and trends and to gain an understanding of our comparative operating performance. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures serve as useful metrics for our management and investors because they enable a better understanding of the long-term performance of our core business and facilitate comparisons of our operating results over multiple periods, and when taken together with the corresponding GAAP financial measures and our reconciliations, enhance investors’ overall understanding of our current and future financial performance.
As used herein, Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest income, interest expense, income taxes (including any benefit from reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation allowances), depreciation, amortization, and change in fair value of warrant liabilities and stock-based compensation expense. We have excluded the non-operating items, benefit from reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation allowances and change in fair value of warrant liabilities, because each represents a non-cash charge that is not related to USAT’s operations. We have excluded the non-cash expenses and stock-based compensation as they do not reflect the cash-based operations of USAT. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because we believe it is useful to investors as a measure of comparative operating performance and liquidity, and because it is less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from depreciation and amortization and non-cash charges for changes in fair value of warrant liabilities and stock-based compensation expense.
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Non-GAAP Net Income and
|Three Months Ended|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943||)|
|Fair value of warrant adjustment||168,897||1,308,954|
|Benefit from reduction of valuation allowances||(26,713,897||)||-|
|Non-GAAP net income||$||321,526||$||293,011|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943||)|
|Non-GAAP net income||$||321,526||$||293,011|
|Cumulative preferred dividends||(332,226||)||(332,226||)|
|Net income (loss) applicable to common shares||$||26,534,300||$||(1,348,169||)|
|Non-GAAP net loss applicable to common shares||$||(10,700||)||$||(39,215||)|
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)||35,504,911||32,821,345|
|Net earnings (loss) per common share (basic and diluted)||$||0.75||$||(0.04||)|
|Non-GAAP net loss per common share (basic and diluted)||$||0.00||$||0.00|
Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to Adjusted
|Three Months Ended|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943||)|
|Less interest income||(3,102||)||(11,082||)|
|Plus interest expenses||60,934||61,379|
|Plus income tax expense (benefit)||(26,727,720||)||6,911|
|Plus depreciation expense||1,413,521||1,003,610|
|Plus amortization expense||-||185,600|
|Plus change in fair value of warrant liabilities||168,897||1,308,954|
|Plus stock-based compensation||60,024||149,009|
The APN DevOps Competency highlights APN Partners who demonstrate deep capabilities delivering continuous integration, continuous delivery, and configuration management. They help customers transform their business to be more efficient and agile by leveraging the AWS platform and DevOps principles.
Oct. 7, 2015 01:15 PM EDT Reads: 113
Several years ago, I was a developer in a travel reservation aggregator. Our mission was to pull flight and hotel data from a bunch of cryptic reservation platforms, and provide it to other companies via an API library - for a fee. That was before companies like Expedia standardized such things. We started with simple methods like getFlightLeg() or addPassengerName(), each performing a small, well-understood function. But our customers wanted bigger, more encompassing services that would "do ...
Oct. 7, 2015 01:15 PM EDT Reads: 528
Our guest on the podcast this week is Jason Bloomberg, President at Intellyx. When we build services we want them to be lightweight, stateless and scalable while doing one thing really well. In today's cloud world, we're revisiting what to takes to make a good service in the first place. Listen in to learn why following "the book" doesn't necessarily mean that you're solving key business problems.
Oct. 7, 2015 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 2,192
Apps and devices shouldn't stop working when there's limited or no network connectivity. Learn how to bring data stored in a cloud database to the edge of the network (and back again) whenever an Internet connection is available. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bradley Holt, Developer Advocate at IBM Cloud Data Services, will demonstrate techniques for replicating cloud databases with devices in order to build offline-first mobile or Internet of Things (IoT) apps that can provide a better, ...
Oct. 7, 2015 11:45 AM EDT Reads: 482
Despite all the talk about public cloud services and DevOps, you would think the move to cloud for enterprises is clear and simple. But in a survey of almost 1,600 IT decision makers across the USA and Europe, the state of the cloud in enterprise today is still fraught with considerable frustration. The business case for apps in the real world cloud is hybrid, bimodal, multi-platform, and difficult. Download this report commissioned by NTT Communications to see the insightful findings – registra...
Oct. 7, 2015 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 219
Application availability is not just the measure of “being up”. Many apps can claim that status. Technically they are running and responding to requests, but at a rate which users would certainly interpret as being down. That’s because excessive load times can (and will be) interpreted as “not available.” That’s why it’s important to view ensuring application availability as requiring attention to all its composite parts: scalability, performance, and security.
Oct. 7, 2015 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 371
Culture is the most important ingredient of DevOps. The challenge for most organizations is defining and communicating a vision of beneficial DevOps culture for their organizations, and then facilitating the changes needed to achieve that. Often this comes down to an ability to provide true leadership. As a CIO, are your direct reports IT managers or are they IT leaders? The hard truth is that many IT managers have risen through the ranks based on their technical skills, not their leadership ab...
Oct. 7, 2015 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 856
“All our customers are looking at the cloud ecosystem as an important part of their overall product strategy. Some see it evolve as a multi-cloud / hybrid cloud strategy, while others are embracing all forms of cloud offerings like PaaS, IaaS and SaaS in their solutions,” noted Suhas Joshi, Vice President – Technology, at Harbinger Group, in this exclusive Q&A with Cloud Expo Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff.
Oct. 7, 2015 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 376
As we increasingly rely on technology to improve the quality and efficiency of our personal and professional lives, software has become the key business differentiator. Organizations must release software faster, as well as ensure the safety, security, and reliability of their applications. The option to make trade-offs between time and quality no longer exists—software teams must deliver quality and speed. To meet these expectations, businesses have shifted from more traditional approaches of d...
Oct. 7, 2015 08:45 AM EDT Reads: 161
Ten years ago, there may have been only a single application that talked directly to the database and spit out HTML; customer service, sales - most of the organizations I work with have been moving toward a design philosophy more like unix, where each application consists of a series of small tools stitched together. In web example above, that likely means a login service combines with webpages that call other services - like enter and update record. That allows the customer service team to writ...
Oct. 7, 2015 08:45 AM EDT Reads: 328
As the world moves towards more DevOps and microservices, application deployment to the cloud ought to become a lot simpler. The microservices architecture, which is the basis of many new age distributed systems such as OpenStack, NetFlix and so on, is at the heart of Cloud Foundry - a complete developer-oriented Platform as a Service (PaaS) that is IaaS agnostic and supports vCloud, OpenStack and AWS. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Raghavan "Rags" Srinivas, an Architect/Developer Evangeli...
Oct. 7, 2015 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 133
What Is Emergent About Emergent Architecture? By @TheEbizWizard | @DevOpsSummit #DevOps #BigData #API
All we need to do is have our teams self-organize, and behold! Emergent design and/or architecture springs up out of the nothingness! If only it were that easy, right? I follow in the footsteps of so many people who have long wondered at the meanings of such simple words, as though they were dogma from on high. Emerge? Self-organizing? Profound, to be sure. But what do we really make of this sentence?
Oct. 7, 2015 08:00 AM EDT Reads: 381
There once was a time when testers operated on their own, in isolation. They’d huddle as a group around the harsh glow of dozens of CRT monitors, clicking through GUIs and recording results. Anxiously, they’d wait for the developers in the other room to fix the bugs they found, yet they’d frequently leave the office disappointed as issues were filed away as non-critical. These teams would rarely interact, save for those scarce moments when a coder would wander in needing to reproduce a particula...
Oct. 7, 2015 05:00 AM EDT Reads: 277
In today's digital world, change is the one constant. Disruptive innovations like cloud, mobility, social media, and the Internet of Things have reshaped the market and set new standards in customer expectations. To remain competitive, businesses must tap the potential of emerging technologies and markets through the rapid release of new products and services. However, the rigid and siloed structures of traditional IT platforms and processes are slowing them down – resulting in lengthy delivery ...
Oct. 7, 2015 05:00 AM EDT Reads: 988
Last month, my partners in crime – Carmen DeArdo from Nationwide, Lee Reid, my colleague from IBM and I wrote a 3-part series of blog posts on DevOps.com. We titled our posts the Simple Math, Calculus and Art of DevOps. I would venture to say these are must-reads for any organization adopting DevOps. We examined all three ascpects – the Cultural, Automation and Process improvement side of DevOps. One of the key underlying themes of the three posts was the need for Cultural change – things like t...
Oct. 7, 2015 05:00 AM EDT Reads: 314
In a report titled “Forecast Analysis: Enterprise Application Software, Worldwide, 2Q15 Update,” Gartner analysts highlighted the increasing trend of application modernization among enterprises. According to a recent survey, 45% of respondents stated that modernization of installed on-premises core enterprise applications is one of the top five priorities. Gartner also predicted that by 2020, 75% of
Oct. 7, 2015 04:00 AM EDT Reads: 274
It is with great pleasure that I am able to announce that Jesse Proudman, Blue Box CTO, has been appointed to the position of IBM Distinguished Engineer. Jesse is the first employee at Blue Box to receive this honor, and I’m quite confident there will be more to follow given the amazing talent at Blue Box with whom I have had the pleasure to collaborate. I’d like to provide an overview of what it means to become an IBM Distinguished Engineer.
Oct. 7, 2015 04:00 AM EDT Reads: 173
SYS-CON Events announced today that G2G3 will exhibit at SYS-CON's @DevOpsSummit Silicon Valley, which will take place on November 3–5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. Based on a collective appreciation for user experience, design, and technology, G2G3 is uniquely qualified and motivated to redefine how organizations and people engage in an increasingly digital world.
Oct. 7, 2015 03:00 AM EDT Reads: 396
The cloud has reached mainstream IT. Those 18.7 million data centers out there (server closets to corporate data centers to colocation deployments) are moving to the cloud. In his session at 17th Cloud Expo, Achim Weiss, CEO & co-founder of ProfitBricks, will share how two companies – one in the U.S. and one in Germany – are achieving their goals with cloud infrastructure. More than a case study, he will share the details of how they prioritized their cloud computing infrastructure deployments ...
Oct. 7, 2015 03:00 AM EDT Reads: 699
If you are new to Python, you might be confused about the different versions that are available. Although Python 3 is the latest generation of the language, many programmers still use Python 2.7, the final update to Python 2, which was released in 2010. There is currently no clear-cut answer to the question of which version of Python you should use; the decision depends on what you want to achieve. While Python 3 is clearly the future of the language, some programmers choose to remain with Py...
Oct. 7, 2015 02:00 AM EDT Reads: 204