|By Business Wire||
|May 13, 2014 07:04 AM EDT||
USA Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: USAT) (“USAT”), a leader of wireless, cashless payment and M2M telemetry solutions for small-ticket, self-serve retailing industries, today reported results for the third fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014.
Highlights for the third quarter included:
- GAAP net income of $26.9 million which included $26.7 million related to the partial recognition of a deferred tax asset. Non-GAAP net income was $321,526;
- Net earnings per common share of $0.75, which included $0.75 per share related to the partial recognition of a deferred tax asset. Non-GAAP net loss per common share was $0.00;
- Total revenues of $10.4 million; up 16% from the prior year;
- License and transaction fee revenue of $9.0 million, an increase of 19% over the prior year and representing 86% of total revenues; and
- Adjusted EBITDA of $1.8 million, up 9% from the prior year.
In addition, USAT achieved a record number of new connections to its cashless payment and M2M telemetry service, ePort Connect®, approximately 22,000, in the third quarter. Net new connections for the third quarter totaled approximately 20,000, a 100% increase from 10,000 net new connections for the third quarter of the prior year. Total connections to USAT’s cashless payment and M2M telemetry service, ePort Connect®, were 244,000 as of March 31, 2014, a 24% increase from March 31, 2013.
USAT also continued to demonstrate rapid growth in the number of customers using its ePort Connect service across various segments of the self-serve retail market including vending, commercial laundry, amusement/arcade, taxi and transportation, kiosk and mobile applications. During the third quarter, USAT added 575 new customers to its ePort Connect service, for 6,650 total customers as of March 31, 2014. For the three years ended March 31, 2014, the ePort Connect customer base has grown by a compound annual growth rate of 58%.
“Our results for the third quarter reflect assertive strategies directed toward growing market share, cashless adoption and long-term customer relationships for USAT in this emerging market,” said Stephen P. Herbert, USAT’s chairman and chief executive officer. “Connections were strong and we have a very encouraging pipeline of connections going into our fourth fiscal quarter. We are also looking forward to the additional license and transaction fee revenues associated with a number of new connections achieved through March that had not fully materialized as of quarter end—all factors that we believe bode well for future revenue growth and cash generation.
“We were particularly excited to be able to recognize a deferred tax asset related to our net loss carryovers in the third quarter. This is another important milestone for USAT that we believe speaks to, among other things, the growing strength of our recurring revenue model and the strategies we have put in place to attract new customers and connections to our service,” continued Herbert.
“During the third quarter, we continued to leverage our strong foothold in vending by working with those customers to drive cashless payment into a greater percentage of their installed base of machines,” said Herbert. “Within this same market segment, we also took important steps to extend our value proposition to the other POS touchpoints within a full-service food and beverage operation that can benefit from our ePort Connect service. Beyond vending, third quarter successes also included execution in strategies designed to leverage ePort Connect in adjacent markets, such as commercial laundry and taxi and transportation.”
Third quarter strategic highlights included:
- Introduction of Integrated Payment Services, an evolution of ePort Connect that is designed to support multiple aspects of a full-service food and beverage operation—vending, micro-markets, dining services, distribution/drop off services and loyalty—under the ePort Connect umbrella;
- A new, exclusive agreement with The Pepi Companies, that represented USAT’s first customer under the new Integrated Payment Services model. The agreement substantially expands The Pepi Companies’ relationship with USAT by leveraging USAT products, services and add-on integration capabilities across other segments of its business;
- Continued expansion of third party technologies supported on ePort Connect that further add to the benefits and convenience of doing business with USAT. Examples include AirVend’s android-based interactive touchscreen point-of-sale device, and micro-market support for Revive Self Checkout and Breakroom Provisions;
- Strong execution in taxi and transportation with 2,000 connections achieved in the quarter as well as additional orders for future connections. USAT offers simplified service-only integration to ePort Connect, as well as ePort GO™ USAT’s one-stop offering for the taxi and transportation market; and
- Ongoing enhancements to ePort Connect in the area of consumer engagement that continue to differentiate USAT among its peers. Examples include integration of USAT’s MORE. loyalty and prepaid program across micro-market and other supported technologies as well as the introduction of the MORE. consumer app with eBeacon™ mobile payment powered by Bluetooth low energy "BLE" technology.
Third Quarter Results
Revenues of $10.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 grew by 16% from the same period a year ago. Revenue from license and transaction fees, driven by net connections to USAT’s ePort Connect service through monthly service fees, rental program fees and transaction processing fees, represented 86% of revenues in the third quarter and grew by 19% compared to the same quarter in the prior year.
Gross profit of $4.0 million increased by 9% for the third quarter, from $3.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross profit margin was 38.3%, down from 41.0% for the same period in the prior year, due primarily to lower gross margins associated with license and transaction fees in the quarter, which resulted from deactivations over the last year as well as certain marketing programs, and the timing of those programs, that are designed to further accelerate cashless adoption.
Operating expenses of $3.6 million in the third quarter grew from $3.3 million for the same period in fiscal 2013, largely due to additional investments in sales and marketing during fiscal 2014. Operating income was $365,535 and $350,219 for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, respectively.
GAAP net income for the third quarter was $26.9 million compared to a GAAP net loss of ($1.0) million for the third quarter of the prior year. In the third quarter, USAT recognized a deferred tax asset of $26.7 million due to reduction of the valuation allowance established for operating loss carryovers. Under GAAP, such deferred tax assets are recognized when management has determined that it is more likely than not that the operating loss carryovers would be utilized in future periods.
Non-GAAP net income, which excludes the deferred tax benefit as well as the impact of the fair value of warrant adjustment, was $321,526 for the third quarter compared to $293,011 for the third quarter in the prior year (see non-GAAP Reconciliation table).
After preferred dividends, net earnings per common share was $0.75 for the third quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to a net loss per common share of ($0.04) for the third quarter of fiscal 2013. On a non-GAAP basis, net loss per common share was $0.00 for the both the third quarter of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013.
Cash and cash equivalents stood at approximately $6.6 million as of March 31, 2014, up from $3.9 million as of March 31, 2013.
“Our strategies are delivering important results in this emerging market—more customers, more connections to our service and continued market differentiation,” said Herbert. “We are encouraged by the higher average rate of new connections achieved for the first nine months of fiscal 2014 compared to last year and, for the fourth quarter, anticipate continued progress in driving revenue growth and operating margin expansion.”
Webcast and Conference Call
USA Technologies will conduct a conference call and webcast at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 13, 2014. USA Technologies invites all interested parties to listen to the live webcast of the conference call, accessible on the Investor Relations section of USA Technologies’ website. The webcast will be archived on the website within two hours of the live call. It will remain available for approximately 90 days. Interested parties unable to access the webcast may also participate by calling (866) 393-1608 or, if an international caller, (224) 357-2194. A replay of the call, available until midnight on May 16, 2014, can be accessed by calling (855) 859-2056; Conference ID#29061568, (toll free).
About USA Technologies:
USA Technologies is a leader of wireless, cashless payment and M2M telemetry solutions for small-ticket, self-serve retailing industries. ePort Connect® is the company’s flagship service platform, a PCI-compliant, end-to-end suite of cashless payment and telemetry services specially tailored to fit the needs of small ticket, self-service retailing industries. USA Technologies also provides a broad line of cashless acceptance technologies including its NFC-ready ePort® G-series, ePort Mobile™-for customers on the go, and QuickConnect, an API Web service for developers. USA Technologies has been granted 87 patents and has agreements with Verizon, Visa, Elavon and customers such as Compass, Crane, AMI Entertainment and others. Visit the website at www.usatech.com.
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release, including without limitation the business strategy and the plans and objectives of USAT's management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this release, words such as "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "expect", "intend", and similar expressions, as they relate to USAT or its management, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of USAT's management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to USAT's management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to, the ability of management to accurately predict or forecast future earnings or taxable income of USAT; the incurrence by us of any unanticipated or unusual non-operational expenses which would require us to divert our cash resources from achieving our business plan; the ability of USAT to retain key customers from whom a significant portion of its revenues is derived; the ability of USAT to compete with its competitors to obtain market share; whether USAT's customers continue to utilize USAT's transaction processing and related services, as our customer agreements are generally cancelable by the customer on thirty to sixty days' notice; the ability of USAT to obtain widespread commercial acceptance of it products; the ability of USAT to raise funds in the future through the sales of securities or debt financings in order to sustain its operations if an unexpected or unusual non-operational event would occur; the ability of USAT to use available data to predict future market conditions, consumer behavior and any level of cashless usage; the ability of USAT to efficiently and securely integrate cashless payment with new machine technologies; whether any patents issued to USAT will provide USAT with any competitive advantages or adequate protection for its products, or would be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by others; the ability of USAT to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others; and whether USAT's existing or anticipated customers purchase, rent or utilize ePort devices or our other products or services in the future at levels currently anticipated by USAT. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this release speaks only as of the date of this release. Unless required by law, USAT does not undertake to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
|USA Technologies, Inc.|
|Consolidated Statements of Operations|
|Three months ended||Nine months ended|
|March 31,||March 31,|
|License and transaction fees||$||8,999,689||$||7,562,589||$||26,177,818||$||21,872,187|
|Cost of services||5,785,721||4,525,244||16,690,569||13,080,816|
|Cost of equipment||660,423||774,221||3,036,243||2,748,785|
|Selling, general and administrative||3,479,300||3,003,231||9,968,212||8,918,030|
|Depreciation and amortization||152,953||327,889||438,337||1,004,134|
|Total operating expenses||3,632,253||3,331,120||10,406,549||9,922,164|
|Other income (expense):|
|Change in fair value of warrant liabilities||(168,897)||(1,308,954)||12,304||(1,249,456)|
|Total other expense, net||(226,729)||(1,359,251)||(148,669)||(1,305,948)|
|Income (loss) before benefit (provision) for income taxes||138,806||(1,009,032)||855,474||(802,310)|
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes||26,727,720||(6,911)||26,713,897||(20,734)|
|Net Income (loss)||26,866,526||(1,015,943)||27,569,371||(823,044)|
|Cumulative preferred dividends||(332,226)||(332,226)||(664,452)||(664,452)|
|Net income (loss) applicable to common shares||$||26,534,300||$||(1,348,169)||$||26,904,919||$||(1,487,496)|
|Net earnings (loss) per common share (basic and diluted)||$||0.75||$||(0.04)||$||0.78||$||(0.05)|
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)||35,504,911||32,821,345||34,313,396||32,690,374|
|USA Technologies, Inc.|
|Consolidated Balance Sheets|
|March 31,||June 30,|
|Cash and cash equivalents||$||6,577,117||$||5,981,000|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $47,000 and $18,000, respectively
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||488,146||184,336|
|Deferred income taxes||581,982||-|
|Total current assets||11,240,434||10,726,079|
|Finance receivables, less current portion||325,812||408,674|
|Property and equipment, net||20,755,507||17,240,065|
|Deferred income taxes||26,127,191||-|
|Liabilities and shareholders’ equity|
|Line of credit||4,000,000||3,000,000|
|Current obligations under long-term debt||249,915||247,152|
|Income taxes payable||35,521||-|
|Total current liabilities||11,967,321||12,016,583|
|Long-term debt, less current portion||316,871||122,754|
|Accrued expenses, less current portion||224,312||366,785|
|Deferred tax liabilities||-||40,245|
|Total long-term liabilities||1,179,517||1,180,422|
|Commitments and contingencies|
|Preferred stock, no par value:|
Authorized shares- 1,800,000 Series A convertible preferred- Authorized shares- 900,000 Issued and outstanding shares- 442,968 (liquidation preference of $16,690,456 and $16,026,004, respectively)
Common stock, no par value: Authorized shares- 640,000,000 Issued and outstanding shares- 35,496,570 and 33,284,232, respectively
|Total shareholders’ equity||53,484,291||23,379,191|
|Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity||$||66,631,129||$||36,576,196|
|USA Technologies, Inc.|
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows|
|Three months ended||Nine months ended|
|March 31,||March 31,|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943)||$||27,569,371||$||(823,044)|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Charges incurred in connection with the vesting and issuance of common stock for employee and director compensation
|(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment||(2,431)||(14,815)||7,053||(18,415)|
|Non-cash interest and amortization of debt discount||-||26,934||2,095||26,934|
|Bad debt expense (recoveries), net||(11,277)||(1,599)||66,773||7,459|
|Change in fair value of warrant liabilities||168,897||1,308,954||(12,304)||1,249,456|
|Deferred income taxes, net||(26,727,720)||6,911||(26,713,897)||20,734|
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:|
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets||52,483||59,841||(62,503)||51,730|
|Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities||2,162,782||(217,437)||4,817,958||2,382,748|
|Purchase of property and equipment||(35,134)||(31,413)||(60,361)||(81,691)|
|Purchase of property for rental program||(2,643,439)||(1,778,344)||(7,211,661)||(6,320,514)|
|Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment||5,513||18,908||30,375||18,908|
|Net cash used in investing activities||(2,673,060)||(1,790,849)||(7,241,647)||(6,383,297)|
Net proceeds from the exercise of common stock warrants and the retirement of common stock
|Proceeds from line of credit||-||1,000,000||1,000,000||2,000,000|
|Repayment of long-term debt||(89,366)||(164,363)||(267,043)||(465,084)|
|Net cash provided by financing activities||432,396||910,477||3,019,806||1,522,441|
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents||(77,882)||(1,097,809)||596,117||(2,478,108)|
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period||6,654,999||5,046,346||5,981,000||6,426,645|
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period||$||6,577,117||$||3,948,537||$||6,577,117||$||3,948,537|
|Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:|
|Cash paid for interest||$||59,399||$||32,551||$||189,203||$||84,220|
|Depreciation expense allocated to cost of sales||$||1,260,568||$||861,321||$||3,493,726||$||2,294,862|
|Reclass of rental program property to inventory, net||$||13,686||$||2,296||$||26,803||$||11,923|
|Prepaid items financed with debt||$||144,312||$||2,340||$||246,162||$||130,402|
|Prepaid interest from issuance of warrants for debt costs||$||-||$||55,962||$||-||$||55,962|
|Equipment and software acquired under capital lease||$||195,725||$||80,883||$||217,761||$||80,883|
|Disposal of property and equipment||$||15,141||$||7,700||$||233,857||$||7,700|
Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This press release includes the following measures defined as non-GAAP financial measures by the Securities and Exchange Commission: adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP net income (loss), non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per common share. The presentation of these additional financial measures are not intended to be considered in isolation from, or superior to, or as a substitute for the financial measures prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), including the net income or net loss of USAT or net cash used in operating activities. Management recognizes that non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the items associated with USAT’s net income or net loss as determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures are not required by or defined under GAAP and may be materially different from the non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. USAT has provided reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
As used herein, non-GAAP net income (loss) represents GAAP net income (loss) excluding any benefit from reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance or adjustment for fair value of warrant liabilities. As used herein, non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing non-GAAP net income (loss) applicable to common shares by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding.
Management believes that non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per common share are important measures of USAT’s business. Management uses the aforementioned non-GAAP measures to monitor and evaluate ongoing operating results and trends and to gain an understanding of our comparative operating performance. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures serve as useful metrics for our management and investors because they enable a better understanding of the long-term performance of our core business and facilitate comparisons of our operating results over multiple periods, and when taken together with the corresponding GAAP financial measures and our reconciliations, enhance investors’ overall understanding of our current and future financial performance.
As used herein, Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest income, interest expense, income taxes (including any benefit from reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation allowances), depreciation, amortization, and change in fair value of warrant liabilities and stock-based compensation expense. We have excluded the non-operating items, benefit from reduction of the deferred tax asset valuation allowances and change in fair value of warrant liabilities, because each represents a non-cash charge that is not related to USAT’s operations. We have excluded the non-cash expenses and stock-based compensation as they do not reflect the cash-based operations of USAT. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because we believe it is useful to investors as a measure of comparative operating performance and liquidity, and because it is less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from depreciation and amortization and non-cash charges for changes in fair value of warrant liabilities and stock-based compensation expense.
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Non-GAAP Net Income and
|Three Months Ended|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943||)|
|Fair value of warrant adjustment||168,897||1,308,954|
|Benefit from reduction of valuation allowances||(26,713,897||)||-|
|Non-GAAP net income||$||321,526||$||293,011|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943||)|
|Non-GAAP net income||$||321,526||$||293,011|
|Cumulative preferred dividends||(332,226||)||(332,226||)|
|Net income (loss) applicable to common shares||$||26,534,300||$||(1,348,169||)|
|Non-GAAP net loss applicable to common shares||$||(10,700||)||$||(39,215||)|
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)||35,504,911||32,821,345|
|Net earnings (loss) per common share (basic and diluted)||$||0.75||$||(0.04||)|
|Non-GAAP net loss per common share (basic and diluted)||$||0.00||$||0.00|
Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to Adjusted
|Three Months Ended|
|Net income (loss)||$||26,866,526||$||(1,015,943||)|
|Less interest income||(3,102||)||(11,082||)|
|Plus interest expenses||60,934||61,379|
|Plus income tax expense (benefit)||(26,727,720||)||6,911|
|Plus depreciation expense||1,413,521||1,003,610|
|Plus amortization expense||-||185,600|
|Plus change in fair value of warrant liabilities||168,897||1,308,954|
|Plus stock-based compensation||60,024||149,009|
Much of the value of DevOps comes from a (renewed) focus on measurement, sharing, and continuous feedback loops. In increasingly complex DevOps workflows and environments, and especially in larger, regulated, or more crystallized organizations, these core concepts become even more critical. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, Andi Mann, Chief Technology Advocate at Splunk, will show how, by focusing on 'metrics that matter,' you can provide objective, transparent, and meaningfu...
May. 4, 2016 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,031
Many private cloud projects were built to deliver self-service access to development and test resources. While those clouds delivered faster access to resources, they lacked visibility, control and security needed for production deployments. In their session at 18th Cloud Expo, Steve Anderson, Product Manager at BMC Software, and Rick Lefort, Principal Technical Marketing Consultant at BMC Software, will discuss how a cloud designed for production operations not only helps accelerate developer...
May. 4, 2016 06:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,243
Wow, if you ever wanted to learn about Rugged DevOps (some call it DevSecOps), sit down for a spell with Shannon Lietz, Ian Allison and Scott Kennedy from Intuit. We discussed a number of important topics including internal war games, culture hacking, gamification of Rugged DevOps and starting as a small team. There are 100 gold nuggets in this conversation for novices and experts alike.
May. 4, 2016 06:00 AM EDT Reads: 941
The notion of customer journeys, of course, are central to the digital marketer’s playbook. Clearly, enterprises should focus their digital efforts on such journeys, as they represent customer interactions over time. But making customer journeys the centerpiece of the enterprise architecture, however, leaves more questions than answers. The challenge arises when EAs consider the context of the customer journey in the overall architecture as well as the architectural elements that make up each...
May. 4, 2016 03:45 AM EDT Reads: 2,030
In a crowded world of popular computer languages, platforms and ecosystems, Node.js is one of the hottest. According to w3techs.com, Node.js usage has gone up 241 percent in the last year alone. Retailers have taken notice and are implementing it on many levels. I am going to share the basics of Node.js, and discuss why retailers are using it to reduce page load times and improve server efficiency. I’ll talk about similar developments such as Docker and microservices, and look at several compani...
May. 4, 2016 02:00 AM EDT Reads: 653
From the conception of Docker containers to the unfolding microservices revolution we see today, here is a brief history of what I like to call 'containerology'. In 2013, we were solidly in the monolithic application era. I had noticed that a growing amount of effort was going into deploying and configuring applications. As applications had grown in complexity and interdependency over the years, the effort to install and configure them was becoming significant. But the road did not end with a ...
May. 4, 2016 01:00 AM EDT Reads: 571
In 2006, Martin Fowler posted his now famous essay on Continuous Integration. Looking back, what seemed revolutionary, radical or just plain crazy is now common, pedestrian and "just what you do." I love it. Back then, building and releasing software was a real pain. Integration was something you did at the end, after code complete, and we didn't know how long it would take. Some people may recall how we, as an industry, spent a massive amount of time integrating code from one team with another...
May. 4, 2016 01:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,096
Admittedly, two years ago I was a bulk contributor to the DevOps noise with conversations rooted in the movement around culture, principles, and goals. And while all of these elements of DevOps environments are important, I’ve found that the biggest challenge now is a lack of understanding as to why DevOps is beneficial. It’s getting the wheels going, or just taking the next step. The best way to start on the road to change is to take a look at the companies that have already made great headway ...
May. 4, 2016 12:45 AM EDT Reads: 384
In the world of DevOps there are ‘known good practices’ – aka ‘patterns’ – and ‘known bad practices’ – aka ‘anti-patterns.' Many of these patterns and anti-patterns have been developed from real world experience, especially by the early adopters of DevOps theory; but many are more feasible in theory than in practice, especially for more recent entrants to the DevOps scene. In this power panel at @DevOpsSummit at 18th Cloud Expo, moderated by DevOps Conference Chair Andi Mann, panelists will dis...
May. 3, 2016 08:45 PM EDT Reads: 996
Struggling to keep up with increasing application demand? Learn how Platform as a Service (PaaS) can streamline application development processes and make resource management easy.
May. 3, 2016 08:45 PM EDT Reads: 2,207
As the software delivery industry continues to evolve and mature, the challenge of managing the growing list of the tools and processes becomes more daunting every day. Today, Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) platforms are proving most valuable by providing the governance, management and coordination for every stage of development, deployment and release. Recently, I spoke with Madison Moore at SD Times about the changing market and where ALM is headed.
May. 3, 2016 08:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,574
If there is anything we have learned by now, is that every business paves their own unique path for releasing software- every pipeline, implementation and practices are a bit different, and DevOps comes in all shapes and sizes. Software delivery practices are often comprised of set of several complementing (or even competing) methodologies – such as leveraging Agile, DevOps and even a mix of ITIL, to create the combination that’s most suitable for your organization and that maximize your busines...
May. 3, 2016 07:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,925
The goal of any tech business worth its salt is to provide the best product or service to its clients in the most efficient and cost-effective way possible. This is just as true in the development of software products as it is in other product design services. Microservices, an app architecture style that leans mostly on independent, self-contained programs, are quickly becoming the new norm, so to speak. With this change comes a declining reliance on older SOAs like COBRA, a push toward more s...
May. 3, 2016 05:45 PM EDT Reads: 1,632
I have an article in the recently released “DZone Guide to Building and Deploying Applications on the Cloud” entitled “Fullstack Engineering in the Age of Hybrid Cloud”. In this article I discuss the need and skills of a Fullstack Engineer with relation to troubleshooting and repairing complex, distributed hybrid cloud applications. My recent experiences with troubleshooting issues with my Docker WordPress container only reinforce the details I wrote about in this piece. Without my comprehensive...
May. 3, 2016 04:45 PM EDT Reads: 929
Digital means customer preferences and behavior are driving enterprise technology decisions to be sure, but let’s not forget our employees. After all, when we say customer, we mean customer writ large, including partners, supply chain participants, and yes, those salaried denizens whose daily labor forms the cornerstone of the enterprise. While your customers bask in the warm rays of your digital efforts, are your employees toiling away in the dark recesses of your enterprise, pecking data into...
May. 3, 2016 04:45 PM EDT Reads: 1,140
Small teams are more effective. The general agreement is that anything from 5 to 12 is the 'right' small. But of course small teams will also have 'small' throughput - relatively speaking. So if your demand is X and the throughput of a small team is X/10, you probably need 10 teams to meet that demand. But more teams also mean more effort to coordinate and align their efforts in the same direction. So, the challenge is how to harness the power of small teams and yet orchestrate multiples of them...
May. 3, 2016 03:30 PM EDT Reads: 398
You deployed your app with the Bluemix PaaS and it's gaining some serious traction, so it's time to make some tweaks. Did you design your application in a way that it can scale in the cloud? Were you even thinking about the cloud when you built the app? If not, chances are your app is going to break. Check out this webcast to learn various techniques for designing applications that will scale successfully in Bluemix, for the confidence you need to take your apps to the next level and beyond.
May. 3, 2016 12:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,599
SYS-CON Events announced today that Peak 10, Inc., a national IT infrastructure and cloud services provider, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Peak 10 provides reliable, tailored data center and network services, cloud and managed services. Its solutions are designed to scale and adapt to customers’ changing business needs, enabling them to lower costs, improve performance and focus inter...
May. 3, 2016 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,378
With DevOps becoming more well-known and established practice in nearly every industry that delivers software, it is important to continually reassess its efficacy. This week’s top 10 includes a discussion on how the quick uptake of DevOps adoption in the enterprise has posed some serious challenges. Additionally, organizations who have taken the DevOps plunge must find ways to find, hire and keep their DevOps talent in order to keep the machine running smoothly.
May. 3, 2016 06:30 AM EDT Reads: 1,501
Much of the discussion around cloud DevOps focuses on the speed with which companies need to get new code into production. This focus is important – because in an increasingly digital marketplace, new code enables new value propositions. New code is also often essential for maintaining competitive parity with market innovators. But new code doesn’t just have to deliver the functionality the business requires. It also has to behave well because the behavior of code in the cloud affects performan...
May. 3, 2016 03:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,454