|By Cloud Best Practices Network||
|May 4, 2014 06:46 AM EDT||
Current approaches to IDaaS on one hand enforce trust of consumer data using legal compliance, risk and impact assessment and the other hand require technical implementation of access controls to personal data held by an enterprise. Balancing trust has to be done across all layers, verifying person’s identities, showing the individual and the service is real, creating short term relationships and verifying and maintaining all long the Cloud service the user mapping between the enterprise and the cloud user account in a mesh federation. This makes sense only if enterprises design “on-premise” with MaaS their own flexible ID data model and can verify ID maturity and consistency before moving, and along, the ID service in the Cloud. Based on MaaS, the BYOID concept is a possible solution to ID models for consent policy design, management and deployment. The BYOID model is a means to expressing, tracing and updating consumer’s personal data policy requirements; however enterprise users’ privacy preferences are provided as well. The IDaaS Maturity Framework (IMF) defines and directs the BYOID practice. MaaS guide properties and personal preferences from the consent metamodel design to the ID deployment. Both ensure that ecosystem compliance is achieved and ID in the Cloud meets trustworthy relationships.
IMF supports flexible BYOID design and deployment
IDaaS is authentication and authorization infrastructure that is built, hosted and managed through different models by third-party service providers, resident in ID ecosystem frameworks. IDaaS for the enterprise is typically purchased as a subscription-based managed service. One or more cloud service providers, depending upon the IDaaS model the enterprise deploys, may host applications and provide subscribers with role-based web access to specific applications or even entire virtualized infrastructure. IDaaS makes enterprises responsible in evaluating privacy risks and grade of confidence when moving the ID to the cloud. Accordingly, before externalizing the corporate IdM, consider the different IDaaS models are supported depending upon the maturity levels of:
- IdM/IAM system, in terms of implementation, maintenance and IdM/IAM governance capacity. ID, by its nature is de-centralized and then the maturity rank should consider the whole IdM/IAM system including data protection, data manageability, data security and organization ID awareness at all levels;
- SOA system, to really understand policies by applied processes’ de-coupling (privileges by user role, accreditations, de-accreditations …) and procedures dynamically acting into the organization;
- ID ecosystem reliability and adherence to the frameworks’ security criteria that measure service provider(s) compliance.
Fig. 1 – An example of enterprise BYOID consent model lifecycle to IDaaS deployment and reconciliation
However, the levels of maturity gauged along the organization enables the enterprise to design its own ID as a consequence of the appropriate IDaaS model. The enterprise is able to bring in the ID ecosystem a configurable IDaaS model based on MaaS design to satisfy enterprise business rules. Business rules have impact on enterprise identity requirements and they balance and reconcile consumer identities needs. This “fluid” multiple-way enterprises-consumers solution, or BYOID, creates a high assurance level of ID ecosystem participants’ identities that could be used for enterprise access by respecting privacy and security requirements: IDaaS models contain BYOID properties and define “on-premise” BYOID maturity and consistency.
A new concept of ID consent: the BYOID fluid model
When registering to an Identity Platform, users would like represent themselves according to their behaviour having the option to approve selective or discretionary sharing of their private information and looking for the ability to obfuscate, mask or mesh some parts of personal data. So, ID platform and user are creating interactively a bond of trust as a part of the whole ID service. This is possible only if the consent of the individuals, the data protection conditions for processing their personal data and consent policies might be modelled “on-premise” by the enterprise IdM.
Looking at the IMF, the ID metamodel might sprout in the IdM/IAM maturity appraisal stage, according to the properties and requirements the enterprise needs to protect personal data and sensible information. The question now is the following: if the ID metamodel is designed in the company IdM, could the consent model be considered proprietary? The metamodel gathers the properties corresponding to the real enterprise requirements but it will be tested and appraised firstly in IdM/IAM system and then in the SOA maturity system. At that point features like interoperability, expression of functionality and user’s behaviour will be explicit aspects of the BYOID data model such as the following:
1) Trust properties;
3) Scalability and performance;
6) Credential Types;
9) User Centricity/User Control.
The above properties are matter for the ID ecosystem public consent data model structure (basic/incoming tables of the BYOID metamodel). In the beginning, those metadata are properties of the company: the company’s BYOID metamodel. Once the BYOID metamodel has been defined, tested and approved as BYOID company data model, it will be released to the ID ecosystem as an IDaaS model subscription. Despite of different approach, each enterprise may then adopt and release his BYOID. Before deploying BYOID services in the Cloud, the BYOID model should be compared with other BYOID models already running into the ID ecosystem frameworks. To be accepted, BYOIDs have to meet a set of common requirements enforced by the consent public ID ecosystem framework authority: the more adaptive is the public consent model (continuously and rigorously improved), the more flexible, secure and reliable are the BYOIDs shared. It makes interactive, fluid and safe BYOIDs deployed through IDaaS. Still, this enables user’s behaviour can be captured both at high level (enterprise-ecosystem reconciliation) and at low level (personal-enterprise-ecosystem reconciliation). Therefore BYOID can be reconciled, renormalized and constantly trusted at all levels. Since BYOID metamodel contains the enterprise identity requirements, it might include and integrate the ID ecosystem identity properties and, if approved by the user (obligation to maintain the personal data securely), his personal properties. This aspect is very important: in fact, there’s significant risk for a company when both customer/user relationships and company data are stored on personal devices. Using BYOID deployed as an IDaaS subscription, company information is centralized based upon “on-premise” consent metamodels: this means that company information stored on personal devices is minimized and always centrally controlled.
User’s personal properties might reside on the same company (central) metamodel/consent model or not depending upon user approval and, always possible, withdrawal (i.e. personal data should comply with data protection legislation and, where necessary, the approval of the individual must be obtained). In the figure 2 here is an example. In 1 the User tries a new behaviour (statistically relevant or as a recommender system outcome); in 2 the IDaaS user experience has to be changed and updated. Above we show 3 data models but in the MaaS representation they consist of a unique model containing the BYOID IDaaS subscription (master) that includes 2 sub-models: the company consent model and the user personal model. In 3, the consent model is modified to keep compliance with the company business rules/conduct mapped to the BYOID IDaaS subscription. In 4, finally the update is executed and the User can find his conduct as a new function. However, take note in the figure 2 a relational model-like formalism is applied. This is just a simplification. In effect, we are in a multi-level relational data model that can be represented with NoSQL, Vector or Graph DB else, depending upon the data analytics domain.
USE CASE: the fluid BYOID approach
IDaaS models to move ID to the Cloud enable organizations to externalize identities data more knowingly and securely. Employees and customers behaviour changed: they continuously have business contacts, calls and meetings with personal devices. Since an increasing quantity of employees uses their mobile devices everywhere, identities can be resident and so associated to applications running on different framework in a multi-topology cloud configuration. What should be then the best IDaaS model satisfying this new employees/customers conduct? Could be managed all users, across multiple locations, while securing company data? Because of each identity may be managed by different identity management services, authentication and validation of identities by the cloud infrastructure could not be sufficient. Companies have to verify and control “on-premise” their ID maturity. BYOID based upon IDaaS models allows to identifying and securing identity properties. Further IDaaS models assist ID integrity control over shared topologies with a variety of ID ecosystem frameworks. IMF plays a crucial role in identifying the most appropriate IDaaS model before deploying the BYOID to the Cloud. Then the BYOID is an IDaaS model and can be designed “on-premise” and controlled along deployment and subscription.
Properties and Directions
This use case is concerned with enterprises deploying their BYOID in the Cloud using IDaaS models and IMF. There is a need for evaluating “on-premise” organization IdM/IAM and SOA maturity before moving the ID to the Cloud. Evaluating the organization maturity levels involves three steps:
- IdM/IAM maturity: measure the IdM/IAM maturity level;
- SOA maturity: measure SOA maturity level – policies (privileges by user role, accreditations, de-accreditations …) and processes dynamically acting;
- Identity Ecosystem reliability/maturity: measure the ecosystem maturity/reliability, and above all, the secure service continuity because in hybrid topologies identities may be owned by different cloud providers resident in multi-topologies.
Objectives are the following:
- Enable organization to identify and set the best BYOID through IDaaS model based upon internals levels of IdM/IAM and SOA maturity compared to the ID ecosystem framework’s baseline adherence. This sets maturity in classifying the ID ecosystem framework and in evaluating the reliability the ID ecosystem may provide;
- Deploy the proper BYOID model applying the correct subscription and adherence with respect to the IDaaS ecosystem;
- Periodically measure the organization’s IdM/IAM and SOA maturity levels and verify the ID ecosystem reliability/maturity so to update, and eventually scale, the BYOID deployed.
However, accordingly with the objectives, the value of the ID ecosystem level of reliability/maturity is the outcome the company is expecting to:
- Keep BYOID secure and controlled and supervise the IDaaS service subscription;
- Contribute to the ecosystem as participant and/or as authority;
- Be a participant/counterpart in setting and approving attributes providers, policies and relying party’s decisions and IDaaS ecosystem adherence;
- Contribute to the IDaaS Trustmark definition and to the periodical appraisal and updating.
BYOID Use Case: main categories, service models, actors and systems
BYOID Use Case: main services
BYOID Use Case: main dependencies and assumptions
Process Flow along the IMF
Accordingly to this Use Case, the IMF process flow encompasses three steps:
Part 1: Appraise IdM/IAM Maturity Level – To cover definition, maintenance and upgrade of the organization IdM/IAM level of maturity. The IdM/IAM maturity value has to be periodically monitored and controlled to keep coherence with the IDaaS model deployed:
Figure 3 – BYOID: IDM/IAM Maturity Level Appraisal
The Identity and Access Manager verifies the Maturity level of the IdM/IAM system:
- The IdM Manager controls and regulates the accesses to information assets by providing policy controls of who can use a specific system based on an individual’s role and the current role’s permissions and restrictions. This ensures that access privileges are granted according to one interpretation of policy and all users and services are properly authenticated, authorized and audited;
- The BYOID Manager reconciles BYOID metadata and update the BYOID metamodel.
The IAM Manager controls if users’ identities can be extended beyond corporate employees to include vendors, customers, machines, generic administrator accounts and electronic access badges, all ruled by policy controls.
Part 2: Appraise the SOA Maturity Level – To cover definition, maintenance and upgrade of the organization SOA maturity level. The SOA maturity level has to be periodically monitored and controlled to keep coherence with the BYOID released:
Figure 4 – BYOID: SOA maturity level appraisal
The SOA Manager verifies the Maturity level of the SOA system through the SOA interoperability and defines the organization maturity in sharing services among departments:
- The SOA Manager verifies that the map of communications between services is drawn starting from IdM/IAM system and achieved maturity
- The SOA Manager controls and reports about the following crucial aspects:
- SOA reference architecture achievements and evolution;
- education to broaden SOA culture through the organization;
- methods and guidelines that organization adopts to apply SOA;
- policy for SOA appliance and governance.
- The BYOID Practice Manager tests and executes BYOID consent model reconciliation based on metamodel reconciliation and update. If necessary, BYOID Manager renormalizes the consent model by roundtrip with the BYOID metadata at IdM/IAM maturity level.
Part 3: Appraise the ID Ecosystem Reliability/Maturity – To establish the maturity/ reliability of the ID Ecosystem Posture. The comparative maturity of BYOID (Company vs. ID Ecosystem participants vs. user preferences) has to be continually monitored: points of discontinuity, unmatched policies, and untrusted relationships have to be time by time acknowledged. This helps to better qualifying frameworks accountability, federation assets, and participants’ reliability and level of contribution:
Figure 5 – BYOID: ID Ecosystem Maturity/Reliability Appraisal
The Service Manager verifies the Maturity/ Reliability level of the ID Ecosystem framework:
- The Service Manager controls that contribution to the ecosystem by privacy aspects, security components and accountability mechanism settings are congruent
- The Service Manager controls that common guidelines keep coherence with the company policies and standards strategy. Since more than a framework exists inside the ecosystem, rules to ensure that accreditation authorities validate participants’ adherence to the ecosystem requirements are to be verified and updated
- The Service Manager controls adherence to the ID ecosystem of the IDaaS deployed to verify reliability and service continuity;
- The Service Manager verifies that accreditation authority to ensure participants and frameworks are adherent to the identity ecosystem interoperability standards accepted
- The Service Manager controls that the ID ecosystem contains all trusted frameworks that satisfy the baseline standards established and they are compliant with the company maturity level
- The BYOID Practice Manager verifies the framework ecosystem common levels of adherence (baseline) and test and compare BYOID reliability properties;
- The ID Ecosystem Management Service verifies BYOID adherence and security with respect the IDaaS subscription.
The ID Ecosystem Management service provides a combination of criteria to determine the service providers’ compliance among frameworks and ID ecosystem topologies: the combination defines policies, rules and, eventually, a Trustmark. It gives confidence to participants in deciding who to trust in terms of BYOID framework adherence and among all ID providers.
Managing digital identities across ID ecosystems frameworks is crucial to improve efficiency of business collaborations. Using everywhere personal devices is becoming a preferred conduct but before sharing the ID among cloud domains, all involved parties need to be trusted. Still, to meet the demanding needs of security, big data analytics and business intelligence, users and consumers need a more efficient and flexible paradigms. In this paper, we identify how BYOID fluid model satisfies on one hand company security and user data protection and, on the other hand, rapid updating and reconciliation to the user conduct. IMF provides the necessary platform for collaboration in ID ecosystem topologies. We introduce also a USE CASE to point out how BYOID built across ID company consent model and ID ecosystem trusted access model, can be a foundation to gauge and govern BYOID strategies. Further, the paper can be used to compare different BYOID IDaaS subscription to establish what maturity levels the company might support compared with all business partners running existing IDaaS maturity models and to ensure ID in the Cloud meets trustworthy relationships.
I have to sincerely thank Susan Morrow for the precious feedback on contents and Anil Saldhana for the useful comments on the IDaaS Maturity Framework.
References N. Piscopo – IDaaS. Verifying the ID ecosystem operational posture
 N. Piscopo – A high-level IDaaS metric: if and when moving ID in the Cloud
 N. Piscopo – MaaS implements Small Data and enables Personal Clouds
 N. Piscopo – Best Practices for Moving to the Cloud using Data Models in the DaaS Life Cycle
 N. Piscopo – MaaS (Model as a Service) is the emerging solution to design, map, integrate and publish Open Data
 N. Piscopo – MaaS applied to Healthcare – Use Case Practice
 N. Piscopo – Applying MaaS to DaaS (Database as a Service) Contracts. An introduction to the Practice
 N. Piscopo – Enabling MaaS Open Data Agile Design and Deployment with CA ERwin®
 N. Piscopo – ERwin® in the Cloud: How Data Modeling Supports Database as a Service (DaaS) Implementations
 N. Piscopo – CA ERwin® Data Modeler’s Role in the Relational Cloud
 N. Piscopo – Using CA ERwin® Data Modeler and Microsoft SQL Azure to Move Data to the Cloud within the DaaS Life Cycle
 N. Piscopo – Page 16 in Transform2, MaaS and UMA implementation
 Kantara Initiatives -http://kantarainitiative.org/
 OASIS IDCloud Group Disussions and Documents
Disclaimer – This document is provided AS-IS for your informational purposes only. In no event the contains of “ID Consent: applying the IDaaS Maturity Framework to design e deploy interactive BYOID (Bring-Your-Own-ID) with Use Case” will be liable to any party for direct, indirect, special, incidental, economical (including lost business profits, business interruption, loss or damage of data, and the like) or consequential damages, without limitations, arising out of the use or inability to use this documentation, regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort (including negligence), breach of warranty, or otherwise, even if an advise of the possibility of such damages there exists. Specifically, it is disclaimed any warranties, including, but not limited to, the express or implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement, regarding this document use or performance. All trademarks, trade names, service marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies/offices.
The stack is the hack, Jack. That's my takeaway from several events I attended over the past few weeks in Silicon Valley and Southeast Asia. I listened to and participated in discussions about everything from large datacenter management (think Facebook Open Compute) to enterprise-level cyberfraud (at a seminar in Manila attended by the US State Dept. and Philippine National Police) to the world of entrepreneurial startups, app deployment, and mobility (in a series of meetups and talks in bot...
May. 27, 2015 01:15 AM EDT Reads: 2,566
Python is really a language which has swept the scene in recent years in terms of popularity, elegance, and functionality. Research shows that 8 out 10 computer science departments in the U.S. now teach their introductory courses with Python, surpassing Java. Top-ranked CS departments at MIT and UC Berkeley have switched their introductory courses to Python. And the top three MOOC providers (edX, Coursera, and Udacity) all offer introductory programming courses in Python. Not to mention, Python ...
May. 26, 2015 11:45 PM EDT Reads: 883
Let's just nip the conflation of these terms in the bud, shall we?
"MIcro" is big these days. Both microservices and microsegmentation are having and will continue to have an impact on data center architecture, but not necessarily for the same reasons. There's a growing trend in which folks - particularly those with a network background - conflate the two and use them to mean the same thing.
They are not.
One is about the application. The other, the network. T...
May. 26, 2015 11:30 PM EDT Reads: 925
Containers Expo Blog covers the world of containers, as this lightweight alternative to virtual machines enables developers to work with identical dev environments and stacks. Containers Expo Blog offers top articles, news stories, and blog posts from the world's well-known experts and guarantees better exposure for its authors than any other publication. Bookmark Containers Expo Blog ▸ Here Follow new article posts on Twitter at @ContainersExpo
May. 26, 2015 11:00 PM EDT Reads: 693
Right off the bat, Newman advises that we should "think of microservices as a specific approach for SOA in the same way that XP or Scrum are specific approaches for Agile Software development". These analogies are very interesting because my expectation was that microservices is a pattern. So I might infer that microservices is a set of process techniques as opposed to an architectural approach. Yet in the book, Newman clearly includes some elements of concept model and architecture as well as p...
May. 26, 2015 09:00 PM EDT Reads: 3,419
Docker is an open platform for developers and sysadmins of distributed applications that enables them to build, ship, and run any app anywhere. Docker allows applications to run on any platform irrespective of what tools were used to build it making it easy to distribute, test, and run software. I found this 5 Minute Docker video, which is very helpful when you want to get a quick and digestible overview. If you want to learn more, you can go to Docker’s web page and start with this Docker intro...
May. 26, 2015 09:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,753
The 5th International DevOps Summit, co-located with 17th International Cloud Expo – being held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA – announces that its Call for Papers is open. Born out of proven success in agile development, cloud computing, and process automation, DevOps is a macro trend you cannot afford to miss. From showcase success stories from early adopters and web-scale businesses, DevOps is expanding to organizations of all sizes, including the...
May. 26, 2015 05:30 PM EDT Reads: 3,972
There’s a lot of discussion around managing outages in production via the likes of DevOps principles and the corresponding software development lifecycles that does enable higher quality output from development, however, one cannot lay all blame for “bugs” and failures at the feet of those responsible for coding and development. As developers incorporate features and benefits of these paradigm shift, there is a learning curve and a point of not-knowing-what-is-not-known. Sometimes, the only way ...
May. 26, 2015 05:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,153
You use an agile process; your goal is to make your organization more agile. But what about your data infrastructure? The truth is, today's databases are anything but agile - they are effectively static repositories that are cumbersome to work with, difficult to change, and cannot keep pace with application demands. Performance suffers as a result, and it takes far longer than it should to deliver new features and capabilities needed to make your organization competitive. As your application an...
May. 26, 2015 05:00 PM EDT Reads: 3,388
Over the years, a variety of methodologies have emerged in order to overcome the challenges related to project constraints. The successful use of each methodology seems highly context-dependent. However, communication seems to be the common denominator of the many challenges that project management methodologies intend to resolve. In this respect, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can be viewed as powerful tools for managing projects. Few research papers have focused on the way...
May. 26, 2015 05:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,700
As the world moves from DevOps to NoOps, application deployment to the cloud ought to become a lot simpler. However, applications have been architected with a much tighter coupling than it needs to be which makes deployment in different environments and migration between them harder. The microservices architecture, which is the basis of many new age distributed systems such as OpenStack, Netflix and so on is at the heart of CloudFoundry – a complete developer-oriented Platform as a Service (PaaS...
May. 26, 2015 05:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,579
The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long development cycles that produce software that is obsolete at launch. DevOps may be disruptive, but it is essential. The DevOps Summit at Cloud Expo – to be held June 3-5, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City – will expand the DevOps community, enable a wide...
May. 26, 2015 03:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,852
How can you compare one technology or tool to its competitors? Usually, there is no objective comparison available. So how do you know which is better? Eclipse or IntelliJ IDEA? Java EE or Spring? C# or Java? All you can usually find is a holy war and biased comparisons on vendor sites. But luckily, sometimes, you can find a fair comparison. How does this come to be? By having it co-authored by the stakeholders. The binary repository comparison matrix is one of those rare resources. It is edite...
May. 26, 2015 03:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,589
Cloud Expo, Inc. has announced today that Andi Mann returns to DevOps Summit 2015 as Conference Chair. The 4th International DevOps Summit will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City. "DevOps is set to be one of the most profound disruptions to hit IT in decades," said Andi Mann. "It is a natural extension of cloud computing, and I have seen both firsthand and in independent research the fantastic results DevOps delivers. So I am excited to help the great team at ...
May. 26, 2015 02:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,571
Enterprises are fast realizing the importance of integrating SaaS/Cloud applications, API and on-premises data and processes, to unleash hidden value. This webinar explores how managers can use a Microservice-centric approach to aggressively tackle the unexpected new integration challenges posed by proliferation of cloud, mobile, social and big data projects. Industry analyst and SOA expert Jason Bloomberg will strip away the hype from microservices, and clearly identify their advantages and d...
May. 26, 2015 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,387
Amazon, Google and Facebook are household names in part because of their mastery of Big Data. But what about organizations without billions of dollars to spend on Big Data tools - how can they extract value from their data? In his session at 6th Big Data Expo®, Ali Ghodsi, Co-Founder and Head of Engineering at Databricks, discussed how the zero management cost and scalability of the cloud is addressing the challenges and pain points that data engineers face when working with Big Data. He also s...
May. 26, 2015 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 4,243
Container frameworks, such as Docker, provide a variety of benefits, including density of deployment across infrastructure, convenience for application developers to push updates with low operational hand-holding, and a fairly well-defined deployment workflow that can be orchestrated. Container frameworks also enable a DevOps approach to application development by cleanly separating concerns between operations and development teams. But running multi-container, multi-server apps with containers ...
May. 26, 2015 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,853
Software development, like manufacturing, is a craft that requires the application of creative approaches to solve problems given a wide range of constraints. However, while engineering design may be craftwork, the production of most designed objects relies on a standardized and automated manufacturing process. By contrast, much of moving an application from prototype to production and, indeed, maintaining the application through its lifecycle has often remained craftwork. In his session at Dev...
May. 26, 2015 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,414
The Internet of Things is a misnomer. That implies that everything is on the Internet, and that simply should not be - especially for things that are blurring the line between medical devices that stimulate like a pacemaker and quantified self-sensors like a pedometer or pulse tracker. The mesh of things that we manage must be segmented into zones of trust for sensing data, transmitting data, receiving command and control administrative changes, and peer-to-peer mesh messaging. In his session a...
May. 26, 2015 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 3,924
SYS-CON Events announced today that EnterpriseDB (EDB), the leading worldwide provider of enterprise-class Postgres products and database compatibility solutions, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. EDB is the largest provider of Postgres software and services that provides enterprise-class performance and scalability and the open source freedom to divert budget from more costly traditiona...
May. 26, 2015 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,515