Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Liz McMillan, Flint Brenton, Jason Bloomberg, Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz

News Feed Item

China Software Industry Report, 2013

NEW YORK, April 25, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

China Software Industry Report, 2013
http://www.reportlinker.com/p099523/China-Software-Industry-Report-2013.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Software_and_Consulting

In recent years, Chinese software industry has shown steady progression as a whole, with the industrial scale expanding continuously, and there is a stably growing number of industrial players. In 2012, the software revenue of China reached RMB2.5 trillion, presenting a year-on-year rise of 32.7%, but down six percentage points against the figure last year.

In 2012, software services and networks developed rapidly, resulting in significant growth in the revenue of data processing and operations services. From January to December, the revenue was RMB 428.5 billion, up 41.5% year on year; the proportion reached 17.1%, 0.9 percentage point higher than that in the same period of last year.

With the stabilization of the manufacturing industry, the embedded system software has accelerated the development and achieved revenue of RMB 397.3 billion, up 31.2% year on year, 2.7 percentage points higher than the industry average. Promoted by favorable industrial policies, IC design achieved revenue of RMB 80.8 billion, up 25.5% year on year; the software product, system integration service and information technology consulting service grew steadily by 27.9%, 24.8% and 24.1% respectively.

The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued the 12th Five-Year Plan on the Development of Software and Information Technology Service Industry, making clear the development strategies and goals in the 12th five-year period, and specifying 10 development priorities and eight major projects. According to industry estimates, by 2015, China's software industry revenue will exceed RMB 4 trillion, with an annual growth rate of more than 25%.

The report resolves around the followings:

Overview of Chinese software industry, involving policy support, market scale, corporate type, development status quo and future development tendency;
Market size and latest development characteristics of Chinese software outsourcing industry;
Market size, competition pattern, etc of Chinese management software market;
11 software outsourcing companies;
8 management software companies;
10 industrial application software companies;
15 other application software companies.

Table of Contents

1. Basic Concepts of Computer Software Industry
1.1 Definition of Computer Software
1.2 Category of Computer Software
1.3 Classification of Computer Software Industry

2. Development of China Software Industry, 2012-2013
2.1 Policy Environment
2.1.1 Policy about Core Electronic Devices, High-end General Chips and Infrastructure Software Products
2.1.2 Electronic Information Industry Restructuring and Revitalization Plan
2.1.3 IT-related Policies and Regulations
2.1.4 "Twelfth Five-Year"(2011-2015) Plan of Information Service Industry
2.1.5 Policies to Further Encourage the Software Industry and IC Industry (also known as "New No.18 Document")
2.1.6 Notice on Corporate Income Tax Policy to Further Encourage the Development of Software Industry and IC Industry
2.2 Software Industry and IT Industry
2.3 Development of Software Industry
2.3.1 Overall Revenue and Export
2.3.2 Software Revenue by Product
2.3.3 Software Revenue by Region

3. China's Software Outsourcing Market and Key Enterprises
3.1 Definition and Concept of Software Outsourcing
3.2 Overview of Software Outsourcing Market
3.3 Neusoft Corporation
3.3.1 Profile
3.3.2 Operation
3.3.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.4 ChinaSoft International Group
3.4.1 Profile
3.4.2 Operation
3.4.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.5 Insigma Technology Co., Ltd.
3.5.1 Profile
3.5.2 Operation
3.5.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.6 Pactera
3.6.1 Profile
3.6.2 Operation
3.6.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.7 SinoCom Software Group Ltd.
3.7.1 Profile
3.7.2 Operation
3.8 Shanghai Hyron Software Co., Ltd.
3.8.1 Profile
3.8.2 Operation
3.8.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.9 iSoftStone Information Technology (Group) Co., Ltd.
3.9.1 Profile
3.9.2 Operation
3.9.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.10 Beyondsoft Group
3.10.1 Profile
3.10.2 Operation
3.10.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
3.11 Others
3.11.1 Dalian Hi-Think Computer Technology, Corp.
3.11.2 Achievo Corporation

4. China's Management Software Market and Key Enterprises
4.1 Definition and Concept of Management Software
4.1.1 Management Software
4.1.2 ERP Software
4.1.3 CRM
4.1.4 SOA
4.1.5 SaaS
4.2 Overview of China's Management Software Market
4.3 UFIDA Software Co., Ltd.
4.3.1 Profile
4.3.2 Operation
4.3.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
4.4 Kingdee International Software Group Co., Ltd.
4.4.1 Profile
4.4.2 Operation
4.4.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
4.5 Shandong Inspur software Co., Ltd.
4.5.1 Profile
4.5.2 Operation
4.5.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
4.6 Beijing Join-Cheer Software Co., Ltd.
4.6.1 Profile
4.6.2 Operation
4.6.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
4.7 Others
4.7.1 DCMS
4.7.2 eAbax
4.7.3 NewGrand

5. Key Industrial Application Software Enterprises
5.1 Glodon Software Co., Ltd.
5.1.1 Profile
5.1.2 Finance
5.1.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.2 YGSOFT Inc.
5.2.1 Profile
5.2.2 Operation
5.2.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.3 Shanghai Baosight Software Co., Ltd.
5.3.1 Profile
5.3.2 Operation
5.3.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.4 Mesnac Co., Ltd.
5.4.1 Profile
5.4.2 Operation
5.4.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.5 Pansoft Co., Ltd.
5.5.1 Profile
5.5.2 Operation
5.5.2 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.6 Wisesoft Co., Ltd.
5.6.1 Profile
5.6.2 Operation
5.7 Hunan Copote Science Technology Co., Ltd.
5.7.1 Profile
5.7.2 Operation
5.7.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.8 QiMing Information Technology Co., Ltd.
5.8.1 Profile
5.8.2 Operation
5.8.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.9 Beijing Shiji Information Technology Co., Ltd.
5.9.1 Profile
5.9.2 Operation
5.9.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.10 China National Software & Service Co., Ltd.
5.10.1 Profile
5.10.2 Operation
5.10.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
5.11 Others

6. Other Key Application Software Enterprises
6.1 Hundsun Technologies Inc.
6.1.1 Profile
6.1.2 Operation
6.1.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.2 Beijing Teamsun Technology Co., Ltd
6.2.1 Profile
6.2.2 Operation
6.2.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.3 Shenzhen Kingdom Technology Co., Ltd.
6.3.1 Profile
6.3.2 Operation
6.3.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.4 Sunyard System Engineering Co., Ltd.
6.4.1 Profile
6.4.2 Operation
6.4.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.5 Beijing Ultrapower Software Co., Ltd
6.5.1 Profile
6.5.2 Operation
6.5.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.6 DHC Software Co., Ltd.
6.6.1 Profile
6.6.2 Operation
6.6.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.7 Shenzhen Infotech Technologies Co., Ltd
6.7.1 Profile
6.7.2 Operation
6.7.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.8 Hexin Flush Information Network Co., Ltd.
6.8.1 Profile
6.8.2 Operation
6.8.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.9 Beijing Supermap Software Co., Ltd.
6.9.1 Profile
6.9.2 Operation
6.9.3 Operation of Key Subsidiaries
6.9.4 Cloud Service
6.10 AutoNavi Holdings Ltd
6.10.1 Profile
6.10.2 Operation
6.10.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.11 Navinfo Co., Ltd.
6.11.1 Profile
6.11.2 Operation
6.11.3 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.12 Hanvon
6.12.1 Profile
6.12.2 Operation
6.12.3 OCR Business
6.12.4 Development Prospects and Strategies
6.13 Wintone
6.13.1 Profile
6.13.2 OCR Business
6.14 Konica Minolta Business Solutions (China) Co., Ltd.
6.14.1 Profile
6.14.2 Solution business
6.15 FujiXerox China
6.15.1 Profile
6.15.2 Key Solutions & Services

Selected Charts

Classification of Software Industry (according to GICS)
Proportion of Software Industry to Information Industry by Production Value, 2008-2012
Software Revenue and Growth Rate of China, 2008-2012
Export and Growth Rate of China's Software, 2008-2012
Revenue Structure of China Software Industry (by Product), 2009-2012
Revenue Structure of China's Software (by Region), 2012
Outsourcing Contract Value and Off-Shore Outsourcing Contract Executed Value in Chia, 2009-2012
Software Outsourcing Export Value of China, 2007-2012
China's Software Exports and Software Outsourcing Services Export Growth Rate, 2008-2012
Percentages of Three Service Outsourcing, 2011-2012
Main M & A Events of Outsourcing Industry in China, 2012
Neusoft's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Neusoft's Net Income and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Neusoft's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2006-2012
ChinaSoft's Revenue and Net Income, 2006-2012
ChinaSoft's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2008-2011
Key Events of ChinaSoft's Outsourcing Business, 2007-2012
Insigma's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Insigma's Net Income and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Insigma's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2008-2012
Pactera's Revenue and Net Income, 2011-2012
Revenue Structure of Pactera (By Product), 2011-2012
SinoCom's Manpower Distribution, 2010-2011
SinoCom's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2007-2012
SinoCom's Net Income and Growth Rate, 2007-2012
SinoCom's Revenue Structure (by Region), 2012H1
SinoCom's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2012H1
Hyron's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Hyron's Net Income and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
iSoftStone's Revenue and Growth Rate,2007-2012
iSoftStone's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2007-2012
iSoftStone's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Major Mergers of iSoftStone in 2012
Beyondsoft's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2009-2012
Beyondsoft's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2009-2012
Beyondsoft's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Management Software Market Competition Pattern in China, 2012
China's Management Software Market Size
UFIDA's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2009-2012
UFIDA's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
UFIDA's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2006-2012
Kingdee's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Kingdee's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Kingdee's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2012
Inspur 's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Inspur 's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Join-Cheer's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Join-Cheer's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Join-Cheer's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2008-2012
Glodon's Revenue?Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2007-2012
Glodon's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2012H1
Glodon's Margin Structure (by Product), 2012H1
YGSOFT's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
YGSOFT's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
YGSOFT's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2011-2012
YGSOFT's Revenue Structure (by Region), 2011-2012
Baosight's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Baosight's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Baosight's RevenueStructure (by Product), 2008-2012
Mesnac's Revenue, Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2007-2012
Mesnac's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2012H1
Pansoft's Revenue, Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Wisesoft's Revenue, Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Copote's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Copote's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
QiMing's Revenue, Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
QiMing's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2007-2012
Gross Margin of QiMing Information Technology by Product, 2007-2012
Shiji's Revenue, Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Shiji's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2011-2012
China National 's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
China National 's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
China National's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2011-2012
Profile of Other Industry Application Software Businesses
Hundsun's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Hundsun's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Hundsun's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Hundsun's Revenue Structure and Gross Margin (by Region), 2011-2012
Teamsun's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Teamsun's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Teamsun's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Gross Margin of Teamsun by Product, 2009-2012
Development Path of Teamsun
Kingdom's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Kingdom's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Kingdom's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Sunyard's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2007-2012
Sunyard's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2007-2012
Sunyard's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Software, Hardware and Service Synergistic Development Strategy
Ultrapower's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2006-2012
Ultrapower's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2006-2012
Ultrapower's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
DHC Software's Revenue and Net Income, 2006-2012
DHC Software's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
DHC Software's Gross Margin (by Product), 2009-2012
DHC Software's Main Technical Development and Business Expansion
Infotech's Revenue and Net Income, 2007-2012
Infotech's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2012
Hexin Flush's Revenue and Net Income, 2006-2012
Hexin Flush's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Supermap's Revenue and Net Income, 2006-2012
Supermap's Revenue Structure and Gross Margin(by Product), 2009-2012
AutoNavi 's Revenueand Growth Rate, 2007-2012
AutoNavi 's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2007-2012
AutoNavi 's Revenue Structure (by Product), 2009-2012
Navinfo's Revenue and Net Income, 2009-2012
Navinfo's Revenue Structure and Gross Margin(by Product), 2007-2012
Hanvon's Revenue and Growth Rate, 2009-2012
Hanvon's Net Income and Net Income Margin, 2009-2012
Hanvon's OCR Revenue and Growth Rate, 2008-2012
Major Products and Services of Konica Minolta Business Solutions (China)
Konica Minolta Optimised Print Services
Main Production Bases of Konica Minolta Business Solutions in China
Key Solutions & Services of Fuji Xerox
Main Production Bases of Fuji Xerox in China

To order this report:
Software_and_Consulting Industry:
China Software Industry Report, 2013

__________________________
Contact Clare: [email protected]
US:(339) 368 6001
Intl:+1 339 368 6001

SOURCE Reportlinker

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@MicroservicesExpo Stories
Most companies are adopting or evaluating container technology - Docker in particular - to speed up application deployment, drive down cost, ease management and make application delivery more flexible overall. As with most new architectures, this dream takes a lot of work to become a reality. Even when you do get your application componentized enough and packaged properly, there are still challenges for DevOps teams to making the shift to continuous delivery and achieving that reduction in cost ...
Don’t go chasing waterfall … development, that is. According to a recent post by Madison Moore on Medium featuring insights from several software delivery industry leaders, waterfall is – while still popular – not the best way to win in the marketplace. With methodologies like Agile, DevOps and Continuous Delivery becoming ever more prominent over the past 15 years or so, waterfall is old news. Or, is it? Moore cites a recent study by Gartner: “According to Gartner’s IT Key Metrics Data report, ...
All organizations that did not originate this moment have a pre-existing culture as well as legacy technology and processes that can be more or less amenable to DevOps implementation. That organizational culture is influenced by the personalities and management styles of Executive Management, the wider culture in which the organization is situated, and the personalities of key team members at all levels of the organization. This culture and entrenched interests usually throw a wrench in the work...
Many organizations are now looking to DevOps maturity models to gauge their DevOps adoption and compare their maturity to their peers. However, as enterprise organizations rush to adopt DevOps, moving past experimentation to embrace it at scale, they are in danger of falling into the trap that they have fallen into time and time again. Unfortunately, we've seen this movie before, and we know how it ends: badly.
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, presented a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to maximize project result...
In his keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Sheng Liang, co-founder and CEO of Rancher Labs, discussed the technological advances and new business opportunities created by the rapid adoption of containers. With the success of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and various open source technologies used to build private clouds, cloud computing has become an essential component of IT strategy. However, users continue to face challenges in implementing clouds, as older technologies evolve and newer ones like Docker c...
For organizations that have amassed large sums of software complexity, taking a microservices approach is the first step toward DevOps and continuous improvement / development. Integrating system-level analysis with microservices makes it easier to change and add functionality to applications at any time without the increase of risk. Before you start big transformation projects or a cloud migration, make sure these changes won’t take down your entire organization.
Without a clear strategy for cost control and an architecture designed with cloud services in mind, costs and operational performance can quickly get out of control. To avoid multiple architectural redesigns requires extensive thought and planning. Boundary (now part of BMC) launched a new public-facing multi-tenant high resolution monitoring service on Amazon AWS two years ago, facing challenges and learning best practices in the early days of the new service.
You often hear the two titles of "DevOps" and "Immutable Infrastructure" used independently. In his session at DevOps Summit, John Willis, Technical Evangelist for Docker, covered the union between the two topics and why this is important. He provided an overview of Immutable Infrastructure then showed how an Immutable Continuous Delivery pipeline can be applied as a best practice for "DevOps." He ended the session with some interesting case study examples.
Both SaaS vendors and SaaS buyers are going “all-in” to hyperscale IaaS platforms such as AWS, which is disrupting the SaaS value proposition. Why should the enterprise SaaS consumer pay for the SaaS service if their data is resident in adjacent AWS S3 buckets? If both SaaS sellers and buyers are using the same cloud tools, automation and pay-per-transaction model offered by IaaS platforms, then why not host the “shrink-wrapped” software in the customers’ cloud? Further, serverless computing, cl...
"We view the cloud not as a specific technology but as a way of doing business and that way of doing business is transforming the way software, infrastructure and services are being delivered to business," explained Matthew Rosen, CEO and Director at Fusion, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), held June 7-9 at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Without lifecycle traceability and visibility across the tool chain, stakeholders from Planning-to-Ops have limited insight and answers to who, what, when, why and how across the DevOps lifecycle. This impacts the ability to deliver high quality software at the needed velocity to drive positive business outcomes. In his general session at @DevOpsSummit at 19th Cloud Expo, Eric Robertson, General Manager at CollabNet, will discuss how customers are able to achieve a level of transparency that e...
We all know that end users experience the internet primarily with mobile devices. From an app development perspective, we know that successfully responding to the needs of mobile customers depends on rapid DevOps – failing fast, in short, until the right solution evolves in your customers' relationship to your business. Whether you’re decomposing an SOA monolith, or developing a new application cloud natively, it’s not a question of using microservices - not doing so will be a path to eventual ...
"DivvyCloud as a company set out to help customers automate solutions to the most common cloud problems," noted Jeremy Snyder, VP of Business Development at DivvyCloud, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 20th Cloud Expo, held June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
We all know that end users experience the Internet primarily with mobile devices. From an app development perspective, we know that successfully responding to the needs of mobile customers depends on rapid DevOps – failing fast, in short, until the right solution evolves in your customers' relationship to your business. Whether you’re decomposing an SOA monolith, or developing a new application cloud natively, it’s not a question of using microservices – not doing so will be a path to eventual b...
"This all sounds great. But it's just not realistic." This is what a group of five senior IT executives told me during a workshop I held not long ago. We were working through an exercise on the organizational characteristics necessary to successfully execute a digital transformation, and the group was doing their ‘readout.' The executives loved everything we discussed and agreed that if such an environment existed, it would make transformation much easier. They just didn't believe it was reali...
"Opsani helps the enterprise adopt containers, help them move their infrastructure into this modern world of DevOps, accelerate the delivery of new features into production, and really get them going on the container path," explained Ross Schibler, CEO of Opsani, and Peter Nickolov, CTO of Opsani, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at DevOps Summit at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Your homes and cars can be automated and self-serviced. Why can't your storage? From simply asking questions to analyze and troubleshoot your infrastructure, to provisioning storage with snapshots, recovery and replication, your wildest sci-fi dream has come true. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Dan Florea, Director of Product Management at Tintri, provided a ChatOps demo where you can talk to your storage and manage it from anywhere, through Slack and similar services with...
"I focus on what we are calling CAST Highlight, which is our SaaS application portfolio analysis tool. It is an extremely lightweight tool that can integrate with pretty much any build process right now," explained Andrew Siegmund, Application Migration Specialist for CAST, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Archi...