Click here to close now.

Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Roger Strukhoff, Hovhannes Avoyan, Lori MacVittie, Liz McMillan, David Sprott

News Feed Item

ESSA Bancorp, Inc. Announces Operating Results for the First Fiscal Quarter of 2013

STROUDSBURG, PA -- (Marketwire) -- 01/23/13 -- ESSA Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: ESSA), the holding company for ESSA Bank & Trust, today announced its operating results for its fiscal first quarter 2013. The Company reported net income of $2.9 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared with net income of $886,000, or $0.08 per diluted share, for the corresponding 2011 period.

The Company completed its acquisition of First Star Bancorp, Inc. on July 31, 2012. The results for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, reflect the effects of a larger company in fiscal first quarter 2013 compared to the company in fiscal first quarter 2012. Additionally, the quarter ended December 31, 2012, includes the recapture of approximately $973,000, before tax, of previous fair value adjustments on loans acquired as part of the First Star acquisition, as well as increased gains on the sale of fixed-rate long-term loans of $334,000 before tax.

Gary S. Olson, President and CEO, commented: "In our first full quarter as a combined entity, we operated with an increased base of earning assets and an enhanced presence throughout Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley. Our earnings were consistent with anticipated results, with the positive addition of the recapture of interest income from the loans we acquired from First Star in 2012. We have made a good start in leveraging the strengths of a significantly larger institution."

As examples of the Bank's increased scale, Mr. Olson noted that assets in fiscal first quarter 2013 were $1.4 billion, compared with $1.1 billion in first quarter 2012. Loans receivable after loss allowance in fiscal first quarter 2013 were $940.3 million, compared with $742.1 million in fiscal first quarter 2012. Total deposits increased to $967.9 million in fiscal first quarter 2013, compared with $640.3 million in fiscal first quarter 2012.

"We continue to see evidence that the acquired assets are of strong quality," said Olson. "We feel asset and customer retention rates are high, and we have had excellent interaction with First Star customers on both the retail and commercial sides of our business.

"Developing a positive corporate culture following an acquisition is critical to our success. Employees have shown excitement about new opportunities, and have been instrumental in facilitating the transition. I think this spirit and attitude is evidenced by very high customer retention levels in the months following the acquisition's closing. I have had many informal meetings with employees and managers, and have been impressed with the quality and sincerity of their ideas and contributions. ESSA Bank & Trust is the largest locally based community bank in the region. I believe our employees are committed to making ESSA the clear banking choice for individuals and businesses in the region.

"For several years, our theme has been 'The Right Way to Bank.' We believe the best way for a community bank to retain and win banking business is with an enthusiastic, experienced team providing financial solutions and a great experience for customers and the community.

"We are beginning to see the financial benefits of eliminating First Star's high-rate debt instruments, reducing First Star expenses, consolidating back-office operations, as well as ESSA's prepayment of $37 million of its own higher rate borrowings in fiscal 2012. With more efficient operations and lower debt obligations, ESSA is well positioned to focus on growth opportunities."

Income Statement Demonstrates Stability, Growth Opportunities

Net interest income increased $4.0 million, or 59.8%, to $10.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, from $6.7 million for the comparable period in the prior year fiscal quarter, primarily reflecting $2.9 million growth in interest income, and a decrease in interest expense from other borrowings of $1.2 million. Interest income increased primarily as a result of the growth of the company's loan portfolio in fiscal first quarter 2013 compared with fiscal first quarter 2012.

Interest income for the fiscal first quarter 2013 also includes the recapture of approximately $500,000, before tax, of a previously recorded fair value adjustment to a loan acquired as part of the First Star acquisition. This loan was fully repaid in the first quarter. An additional $473,000, before tax, was recaptured during the quarter related to similar loans that were partially repaid.

Interest expense decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in interest rates and a decrease in higher rate borrowings for the three months ended December 31, 2012 compared with the three months ended December 31, 2011. The company's interest rate spread was 3.14% for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2.30% for the prior year's first quarter. Net interest margin was 3.26% in fiscal first quarter 2013, compared with 2.57% in fiscal first quarter 2012.

Olson stated: "Acquiring First Star bolstered interest income, and we believe we have an excellent platform for building our commercial and lending businesses that should contribute to our future growth. A key initiative is to grow both business and retail checking in our served markets throughout the coming year. A critical component of this will be to expand relationships with both retail customers and businesses.

"We have maintained our banking leadership role in Monroe County, as a major lending source, and have the most deposits of any bank serving the county. However, this area was hard-hit by the recession and has struggled to recover. Our loan and deposit base in this market remains reasonably stable, but does not offer immediate opportunities for market growth as mortgage lending and business lending have been scarce. We have a solid and stable customer base in a market that has supported ESSA for 97 years, and we'll continue to seek out every opportunity to serve Monroe County and support its recovery and growth."

The provision for loan losses increased $500,000, or 100.0%, to $1,000,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012, from $500,000 for the comparable period in 2011. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss experience, the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a borrower's ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, peer group information, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are subject to interpretation and revision as more information becomes available or as future events occur. The provision for loan losses was in response to this evaluation.

Noninterest income increased $502,000, or 32.9%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared with the three months ended December 31, 2011, primarily reflecting an increase in the gain on sale of loans of $334,000. As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, the Company sold $11.5 million of long-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans during the quarter ended December 31, 2012. There were no loans sold during the comparable 2011 period.

"Although these loans are currently generating attractive returns in a low-interest rate environment, and they are good quality credits, we determined that since the Federal Reserve continues to keep long-term rates low, loans at these rates could have a negative impact on the Bank's margins once rates begin to rise," said Olson. "We anticipate selling more of these long-term loans during the next several quarters to further reduce our interest rate risk."

Noninterest expense increased to $7.5 million or 12.7%, for the three months ended December 31, 2012, from $6.7 million for the comparable period in 2011, reflecting increases in compensation and employee benefits of $620,000, occupancy and equipment of $193,000, data processing of $181,000 and amortization of intangible assets of $169,000. These increases were partially offset by decreases in professional fees of $178,000 and a decrease in the cost to liquidate foreclosed real estate of $293,000.

The increases in noninterest expenses were due primarily to the larger organization in fiscal first quarter 2013 compared with fiscal first quarter 2012. Management notes the Company is on-track to achieve a 30% cost savings in First Star's operations. The decrease in professional fees was due primarily to merger-related legal fees. There was a gain on the sales of foreclosed real estate of $226,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, compared with a loss of $67,000 for the comparable period in 2011.

Balance Sheet, Asset Quality and Capital Adequacy

Total assets decreased $13.1 million, or 0.9%, to $1.41 billion at December 31, 2012, compared to $1.42 billion at September 30, 2012, although up significantly compared with pre-merger total assets. Increases in cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 million and investment securities of $1.9 million at December 31, 2012, compared with September 30, 2012, were offset by decreases in total loans receivable of $8.0 million, regulatory stock of $2.9 million and other assets of $8.5 million.

Total deposits decreased $27.7 million, or 2.8%, to $967.9 million at December 31, 2012, from $995.6 million at September 30, 2012. The primary reason for the decrease in deposits was a decrease in higher-rate certificates of deposit of $22.1 million, which the Company did not renew. Borrowings increased $9.2 million to $244.0 million from $234.7 million during the same period.

Stockholders' equity increased $1.9 million, or 1.1%, to $177.3 million at December 31, 2012, from $175.4 million at September 30, 2012. The increase was due primarily to an increase in retained earnings of $2.3 million. The Company's tier 1 leverage ratio was 12.38% at December 31, 2012.

Nonperforming assets totaled $28.5 million, or 2.03%, of total assets at December 31, 2012, compared with $27.2 million, or 1.92%, of total assets at September 30, 2012. The increase in nonperforming assets of $1.3 million at December 31, 2012 compared to September 30, 2012 was due primarily to an increase in non-performing residential mortgage loans of $1.3 million. The Company made a provision for loan losses of $1,000,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012, compared with a provision of $500,000 for the comparable three-month period in 2011. The allowance for loan losses was $7.6 million, or 0.80%, of loans outstanding at December 31, 2012, compared to $7.3 million, or 0.76%, of loans outstanding at September 30, 2012.

"We continue to be satisfied with the quality of our loan portfolio," explained Olson. "We maintain very strict credit quality policies, and are comfortable with our current loan loss allowance and asset quality ratios. Due to a slowly recovering economy, we will continue to carefully monitor asset quality metrics and will continue to work diligently to reduce non-performing loans."

Olson concluded: "We believe economic conditions in the Lehigh Valley, particularly Bethlehem and Allentown, have not only stabilized, but are showing encouraging signs of strength and revitalization that we believe can generate lending and banking relationship opportunities. We also provide a full range of asset management, business services and employee benefits consulting capabilities, which we believe gives us a competitive advantage in winning customers' financial services business."

ESSA Bank & Trust, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ESSA Bancorp, Inc., has total assets of over $1.4 billion and is the leading service-oriented financial institution headquartered in the Greater Pocono, Pennsylvania region. The Bank maintains its corporate headquarters in downtown Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania and has 26 community offices throughout the Greater Pocono and Lehigh Valley areas in Pennsylvania. In addition to being one of the region's largest mortgage lenders, ESSA Bank & Trust offers a full range of retail, commercial financial services, and financial advisory and asset management capabilities. ESSA Bancorp, Inc. stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Market(SM) under the symbol "ESSA."

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained herein are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period or periods, or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may," "will," "believe," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "continue," or similar terms or variations on those terms, or the negative of those terms. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those related to the economic environment, particularly in the market areas in which the Company operates, competitive products and pricing, fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. Government, changes in government regulations affecting financial institutions, including compliance costs and capital requirements, changes in prevailing interest rates, acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, credit risk management, asset-liability management, the financial and securities markets and the availability of and costs associated with sources of liquidity.

The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company's financial performance and could cause the Company's actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. The Company does not undertake and specifically declines any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions, that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

FINANCIAL TABLES FOLLOW


                      ESSA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                         CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                (UNAUDITED)

                                               December 31,   September 30,
                                                    2012           2012
                                               -------------  -------------
                                                  (dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
  Cash and due from banks                      $      12,443  $      11,034
  Interest-bearing deposits with other
   institutions                                        7,474          4,516
                                               -------------  -------------

    Total cash and cash equivalents                   19,917         15,550
  Certificates of deposit                              1,766          1,266
  Investment securities available for sale           331,525        329,585
  Loans receivable held for sale                       2,096            346
  Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan
   losses of $7,555 and $7,302)                      940,275        950,009
  Regulatory stock, at cost                           19,054         21,914
  Premises and equipment, net                         16,100         16,170
  Bank-owned life insurance                           28,075         27,848
  Foreclosed real estate                               2,503          2,998
  Intangible assets, net                               3,207          3,457
  Goodwill                                             8,541          8,541
  Deferred income taxes                               11,359         11,336
  Other assets                                        21,224         29,766
                                               -------------  -------------

    TOTAL ASSETS                               $   1,405,642  $   1,418,786
                                               =============  =============


LIABILITIES
  Deposits                                     $     967,892  $     995,634
  Short-term borrowings                               84,500         43,281
  Other borrowings                                   159,460        191,460
  Advances by borrowers for taxes and
   insurance                                           6,943          3,432
  Other liabilities                                    9,500          9,568
                                               -------------  -------------

    TOTAL LIABILITIES                              1,228,295      1,243,375
                                               -------------  -------------


STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
  Common stock                                           181            181
  Additional paid in capital                         181,748        181,220
  Unallocated common stock held by the
   Employee Stock Ownership Plan                     (10,872)       (10,985)
  Retained earnings                                   67,455         65,181
  Treasury stock, at cost                            (62,353)       (61,944)
  Accumulated other comprehensive income               1,188          1,758
                                               -------------  -------------

    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                       177,347        175,411
                                               -------------  -------------

    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $   1,405,642  $   1,418,786
                                               =============  =============



                     ESSA BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
                                (UNAUDITED)

                                                    For the Three Months
                                                     Ended December 31
                                               -----------------------------

                                                   (dollars in thousands)
                                                    2012           2011
                                               -------------  --------------
INTEREST INCOME
  Loans receivable                             $      12,237  $        9,341
  Investment securities:
    Taxable                                            1,630           1,638
    Exempt from federal income tax                        54              48
  Other investment income                                 29               2
                                               -------------  --------------

    Total interest income                             13,950          11,029
                                               -------------  --------------


INTEREST EXPENSE
  Deposits                                             1,971           1,911
  Short-term borrowings                                   36               5
  Other borrowings                                     1,224           2,405
                                               -------------  --------------

    Total interest expense                             3,231           4,321
                                               -------------  --------------


NET INTEREST INCOME                                   10,719           6,708
  Provision for loan losses                            1,000             500
                                               -------------  --------------


NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN
 LOSSES                                                9,719           6,208
                                               -------------  --------------

NONINTEREST INCOME
  Service fees on deposit accounts                       807             727
  Services charges and fees on loans                     229             184
  Trust and investment fees                              215             215
  Gain on sale of investments, net                        30               -
  Gain on sale of loans, net                             334               -
  Earnings on Bank-owned life insurance                  226             198
  Insurance commissions                                  175             191
  Other                                                   10               9
                                               -------------  --------------

    Total noninterest income                           2,026           1,524
                                               -------------  --------------

NONINTEREST EXPENSE
  Compensation and employee benefits                   4,556           3,936
  Occupancy and equipment                                949             756
  Professional fees                                      312             490
  Data processing                                        663             482
  Advertising                                            110              86
  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
   Premiums                                              185             162
  Loss (Gain) on foreclosed real estate                 (226)             67
  Amortization of intangible assets                      250              81
  Other                                                  706             602
                                               -------------  --------------

    Total noninterest expense                          7,505           6,662
                                               -------------  --------------

Income before income taxes                             4,240           1,070
Income taxes                                           1,361             184
                                               -------------  --------------


NET INCOME                                     $       2,879  $          886
                                               =============  ==============

Earnings per share
  Basic                                        $        0.24  $         0.08
  Diluted                                               0.24            0.08



                                                At and for the Three Months
                                                    Ended December 31,
                                               ----------------------------
                                                    2012           2011
                                               -------------  -------------
                                                  (dollars in thousands)
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCES:
  Total assets                                 $   1,398,734  $   1,091,756
  Total interest-earning assets                    1,304,096      1,037,175
  Total interest-bearing liabilities               1,157,020        887,040
  Total stockholders' equity                         177,337        161,880

PER COMMON SHARE DATA:
  Average shares outstanding - basic              12,088,125     10,807,598
  Average shares outstanding - diluted            12,088,125     10,807,598
  Book value shares                               13,191,008     12,109,622

Net interest rate spread                                3.14%          2.30%
Net interest margin                                     3.26%          2.57%

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@MicroservicesExpo Stories
The stack is the hack, Jack. That's my takeaway from several events I attended over the past few weeks in Silicon Valley and Southeast Asia. I listened to and participated in discussions about everything from large datacenter management (think Facebook Open Compute) to enterprise-level cyberfraud (at a seminar in Manila attended by the US State Dept. and Philippine National Police) to the world of entrepreneurial startups, app deployment, and mobility (in a series of meetups and talks in bot...
Python is really a language which has swept the scene in recent years in terms of popularity, elegance, and functionality. Research shows that 8 out 10 computer science departments in the U.S. now teach their introductory courses with Python, surpassing Java. Top-ranked CS departments at MIT and UC Berkeley have switched their introductory courses to Python. And the top three MOOC providers (edX, Coursera, and Udacity) all offer introductory programming courses in Python. Not to mention, Python ...

Let's just nip the conflation of these terms in the bud, shall we?

"MIcro" is big these days. Both microservices and microsegmentation are having and will continue to have an impact on data center architecture, but not necessarily for the same reasons. There's a growing trend in which folks - particularly those with a network background - conflate the two and use them to mean the same thing.

They are not.

One is about the application. The other, the network. T...

Containers Expo Blog covers the world of containers, as this lightweight alternative to virtual machines enables developers to work with identical dev environments and stacks. Containers Expo Blog offers top articles, news stories, and blog posts from the world's well-known experts and guarantees better exposure for its authors than any other publication. Bookmark Containers Expo Blog ▸ Here Follow new article posts on Twitter at @ContainersExpo
Right off the bat, Newman advises that we should "think of microservices as a specific approach for SOA in the same way that XP or Scrum are specific approaches for Agile Software development". These analogies are very interesting because my expectation was that microservices is a pattern. So I might infer that microservices is a set of process techniques as opposed to an architectural approach. Yet in the book, Newman clearly includes some elements of concept model and architecture as well as p...
Docker is an open platform for developers and sysadmins of distributed applications that enables them to build, ship, and run any app anywhere. Docker allows applications to run on any platform irrespective of what tools were used to build it making it easy to distribute, test, and run software. I found this 5 Minute Docker video, which is very helpful when you want to get a quick and digestible overview. If you want to learn more, you can go to Docker’s web page and start with this Docker intro...
The 5th International DevOps Summit, co-located with 17th International Cloud Expo – being held November 3-5, 2015, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA – announces that its Call for Papers is open. Born out of proven success in agile development, cloud computing, and process automation, DevOps is a macro trend you cannot afford to miss. From showcase success stories from early adopters and web-scale businesses, DevOps is expanding to organizations of all sizes, including the...
There’s a lot of discussion around managing outages in production via the likes of DevOps principles and the corresponding software development lifecycles that does enable higher quality output from development, however, one cannot lay all blame for “bugs” and failures at the feet of those responsible for coding and development. As developers incorporate features and benefits of these paradigm shift, there is a learning curve and a point of not-knowing-what-is-not-known. Sometimes, the only way ...
You use an agile process; your goal is to make your organization more agile. But what about your data infrastructure? The truth is, today's databases are anything but agile - they are effectively static repositories that are cumbersome to work with, difficult to change, and cannot keep pace with application demands. Performance suffers as a result, and it takes far longer than it should to deliver new features and capabilities needed to make your organization competitive. As your application an...
Over the years, a variety of methodologies have emerged in order to overcome the challenges related to project constraints. The successful use of each methodology seems highly context-dependent. However, communication seems to be the common denominator of the many challenges that project management methodologies intend to resolve. In this respect, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can be viewed as powerful tools for managing projects. Few research papers have focused on the way...
As the world moves from DevOps to NoOps, application deployment to the cloud ought to become a lot simpler. However, applications have been architected with a much tighter coupling than it needs to be which makes deployment in different environments and migration between them harder. The microservices architecture, which is the basis of many new age distributed systems such as OpenStack, Netflix and so on is at the heart of CloudFoundry – a complete developer-oriented Platform as a Service (PaaS...
How can you compare one technology or tool to its competitors? Usually, there is no objective comparison available. So how do you know which is better? Eclipse or IntelliJ IDEA? Java EE or Spring? C# or Java? All you can usually find is a holy war and biased comparisons on vendor sites. But luckily, sometimes, you can find a fair comparison. How does this come to be? By having it co-authored by the stakeholders. The binary repository comparison matrix is one of those rare resources. It is edite...
The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to wait for long development cycles that produce software that is obsolete at launch. DevOps may be disruptive, but it is essential. The DevOps Summit at Cloud Expo – to be held June 3-5, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City – will expand the DevOps community, enable a wide...
Cloud Expo, Inc. has announced today that Andi Mann returns to DevOps Summit 2015 as Conference Chair. The 4th International DevOps Summit will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City. "DevOps is set to be one of the most profound disruptions to hit IT in decades," said Andi Mann. "It is a natural extension of cloud computing, and I have seen both firsthand and in independent research the fantastic results DevOps delivers. So I am excited to help the great team at ...
Enterprises are fast realizing the importance of integrating SaaS/Cloud applications, API and on-premises data and processes, to unleash hidden value. This webinar explores how managers can use a Microservice-centric approach to aggressively tackle the unexpected new integration challenges posed by proliferation of cloud, mobile, social and big data projects. Industry analyst and SOA expert Jason Bloomberg will strip away the hype from microservices, and clearly identify their advantages and d...
Amazon, Google and Facebook are household names in part because of their mastery of Big Data. But what about organizations without billions of dollars to spend on Big Data tools - how can they extract value from their data? In his session at 6th Big Data Expo®, Ali Ghodsi, Co-Founder and Head of Engineering at Databricks, discussed how the zero management cost and scalability of the cloud is addressing the challenges and pain points that data engineers face when working with Big Data. He also s...
Container frameworks, such as Docker, provide a variety of benefits, including density of deployment across infrastructure, convenience for application developers to push updates with low operational hand-holding, and a fairly well-defined deployment workflow that can be orchestrated. Container frameworks also enable a DevOps approach to application development by cleanly separating concerns between operations and development teams. But running multi-container, multi-server apps with containers ...
Software development, like manufacturing, is a craft that requires the application of creative approaches to solve problems given a wide range of constraints. However, while engineering design may be craftwork, the production of most designed objects relies on a standardized and automated manufacturing process. By contrast, much of moving an application from prototype to production and, indeed, maintaining the application through its lifecycle has often remained craftwork. In his session at Dev...
The Internet of Things is a misnomer. That implies that everything is on the Internet, and that simply should not be - especially for things that are blurring the line between medical devices that stimulate like a pacemaker and quantified self-sensors like a pedometer or pulse tracker. The mesh of things that we manage must be segmented into zones of trust for sensing data, transmitting data, receiving command and control administrative changes, and peer-to-peer mesh messaging. In his session a...
SYS-CON Events announced today that EnterpriseDB (EDB), the leading worldwide provider of enterprise-class Postgres products and database compatibility solutions, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. EDB is the largest provider of Postgres software and services that provides enterprise-class performance and scalability and the open source freedom to divert budget from more costly traditiona...