Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Elizabeth White, Pat Romanski, Liz McMillan, Harry Trott, Mamoon Yunus

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Article

BPEL4WS 1.1 To WS-BPEL 2.0 - An SOA Migration Path

BPEL4WS V1.1 has several shortcomings that will be addressed by the next release of the specification

BPEL4WS V1.1 is a public draft release of the "Business Process Execution Language for Web Services" specification dated May 3, 2003. BPEL4WS V1.1 is arguably the de facto standard for Business Process Management (BPM); however, because it's a draft release, BPEL4WS V1.1 has several shortcomings that will be addressed by the next release of the specification (named WS-BPEL 2.0), which is targeted to be released either toward the end of this year or during the beginning of 2006.

WS-BPEL 2.0, henceforth referenced as BPEL 2.0, is considerably different from the previous V1.1 draft release. The article will address these changes and demonstrate how to attempt to migrate a V1.1 business process to be compatible with a BPEL 2.0 engine. Sometimes this migration is simple and can be accomplished by means of syntactic changes to the process; sometimes the migration is not so easy, and mostly results in the rewrite of the process or process fragment. We will start with the simple cases and move toward the more complicated ones.

It is not the intention of this article to explain BPEL 1.1 or to explain the new features of BPEL 2.0, so it is highly recommended that the reader have a good familiarity with the BPEL language.

BPEL 1.1 Features That No Longer Exist
We will first address those features that have been removed from BPEL 1.1. The concept of "partner" is no longer available for BPEL 2.0. A "partner" groups several "partnerLinks," and in doing so represents a common endpoint. Aside from being descriptive, the "partner" concept did not have any executable property, so it was decided that the language did not need this concept.

The XML element "compensationHandler" and the XML attribute "enableInstanceCompensation" in the top-level "process" element have been removed. Instance (process) level compensation handlers never had any mechanism for being invoked; therefore, because they could not be used instance level compensation handling is no longer supported.

Since it is very unlikely that any BPEL 1.1 engine made use of either of these concepts, it is generally safe enough to just remove them from the process definition when migrating to BPEL 2.0.

Syntactic Changes
The following changes are just syntactic. You can simply do a simple find-and-replace to migrate to BPEL 2.0:

  • Replace the XML attribute "variableAccessSerializable" with "isolated"
  • Replace the XML tag "terminate" with "exit"
  • Replace the XML attribute "onMessage" of event handlers with "onEvent"
  • Move the XML attribute "joinCondition" that is present in BPEL activities to be a child element of "targets," as in the following XML fragment:
    <invoke name="settleTrade">
       <targets>
         <joinCondition>
           $buyToSettle and $sellToSettle
         </joinCondition>
         <target linkName="buyToSettle"/>
       </targets>
    </invoke>
  • Replace the XML attribute value "rendezvous" of the attribute "initiate" with the attribute value "join"
  • The schema type "tRole" no longer has a child element representing the port type; instead, the port type is now specified as an attribute directly in the role itself, as demonstrated in the following fragment:
    <plnk:partnerLinkType name="shippingLT">
       <plnk:role name="shippingService"portType="shippingServicePT"/>
    </plnk:partnerLinkType>
  • The attribute "portType" of messaging activities such as "receive," "invoke," "reply," "pick," and "onEvent" is no longer mandatory and can be omitted
  • The URI used to specify XPath 1.0 as the expression/query language of choice has been changed, so replace the attribute value "http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116" of the attributes "expressionLanguage" and "queryLanguage" with the attribute value "urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:sublang:xpath1.0"
In addition to these, the syntax for assignments has been changed, but we will discuss this in a separate section.

Extensibility of Expression/Query Languages
In BPEL 1.1 expressions are used by switch conditions, while conditions and assignments such as XPath expressions are constrained as being an XML attribute value. Although this is not generally a problem for XPath 1.0 expressions, it is awkward for more complex languages such as XPath 2.0 or XQuery 1.0. XML attributes do not provide enough "real estate" for complicated expressions and also do not allow for the use of other XML features such as CDATA, or to write XML itself as the expression.

Hence, to allow for better extensibility of BPEL using external languages, the authoring of expressions and queries are now realized within XML tags (elements) instead of attributes. In practice this means that the XML attributes "for," "until," "joinCondition," "transitionCondition," "expression," "query," and "condition" must all be changed to be XML elements, which would then contain the expressions (the expressions are the former attribute values). The following snippet shows an example of this conversion for XPath 1.0. Note that the attribute "expressionLanguage" is optional.

<while>
   <condition
expressionLanguage="urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:sublang:xpath1.0">
$itemsShipped < bpws:getVariableProperty('shipRequest','sns:itemsTotal')
   </condition>
   <sequence>
     <!- do something -->
   </sequence>
</while>

Listing 1 shows an example of a nonstandard usage of XQuery 1.0 as the expression language. BPEL 2.0 has thus far only standardized the usage of XPath 1.0.

Links
Links are used to specify synchronization dependencies between nested activities within a flow. In BPEL 1.1, links could not cross the boundary of structured activities such as "while," "isolated scope," "event handler," and "compensation handler." In BPEL 2.0, this restriction has been made stronger. Links that create a reentrant control path in scopes are no longer permitted. The reason for this tightening is to simplify the semantic of compensation handling. Figure 1 illustrates this banned scenario.

Messaging
Several aspects of messaging for BPEL 1.1 are unspecified. For example, there is no defined behavior for a process that receives a message for a request-response operation and finishes without replying. In BPEL 2.0, such a scenario would have trigged a new BPEL standard fault called "missingReply" fault.

More Stories By Alexandre Alves

Alexandre Alves currently works at BEA Systems, in the WebLogic Integration group. He has worked with integration technologies for over 10 years, focusing on CORBA, J2EE, and Web services.

Comments (1) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
SOA Web Services Journal News Desk 11/30/05 09:11:36 PM EST

BPEL4WS 1.1 To WS-BPEL 2.0 - An SOA Migration Path. BPEL4WS V1.1 is a public draft release of the 'Business Process Execution Language for Web Services' specification dated May 3, 2003. BPEL4WS V1.1 is arguably the de facto standard for Business Process Management (BPM); however, because it's a draft release, BPEL4WS V1.1 has several shortcomings that will be addressed by the next release of the specification (named WS-BPEL 2.0), which is targeted to be released either toward the end of this year or during the beginning of 2006.

@MicroservicesExpo Stories
While some vendors scramble to create and sell you a fancy solution for monitoring your spanking new Amazon Lambdas, hear how you can do it on the cheap using just built-in Java APIs yourself. By exploiting a little-known fact that Lambdas aren’t exactly single-threaded, you can effectively identify hot spots in your serverless code. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Dave Martin, Product owner at CA Technologies, will give a live demonstration and code walkthrough, showing how ...
Did you know that you can develop for mainframes in Java? Or that the testing and deployment can be automated across mobile to mainframe? In his session and demo at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Dana Boudreau, a Senior Director at CA Technologies, will discuss how increasingly teams are developing with agile methodologies, using modern development environments, and automating testing and deployments, mobile to mainframe.
As DevOps methodologies expand their reach across the enterprise, organizations face the daunting challenge of adapting related cloud strategies to ensure optimal alignment, from managing complexity to ensuring proper governance. How can culture, automation, legacy apps and even budget be reexamined to enable this ongoing shift within the modern software factory?
@DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo taking place Oct 31 - Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center, Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 21st International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is ...
With Cloud Foundry you can easily deploy and use apps utilizing websocket technology, but not everybody realizes that scaling them out is not that trivial. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Roman Swoszowski, CTO and VP, Cloud Foundry Services, at Grape Up, will show you an example of how to deal with this issue. He will demonstrate a cloud-native Spring Boot app running in Cloud Foundry and communicating with clients over websocket protocol that can be easily scaled horizontally and coordinate...
Most companies are adopting or evaluating container technology - Docker in particular - to speed up application deployment, drive down cost, ease management and make application delivery more flexible overall. As with most new architectures, this dream takes a lot of work to become a reality. Even when you do get your application componentized enough and packaged properly, there are still challenges for DevOps teams to making the shift to continuous delivery and achieving that reduction in cost ...
There are several reasons why businesses migrate their operations to the cloud. Scalability and price are among the most important factors determining this transition. Unlike legacy systems, cloud based businesses can scale on demand. The database and applications in the cloud are not rendered simply from one server located in your headquarters, but is instead distributed across several servers across the world. Such CDNs also bring about greater control in times of uncertainty. A database hack ...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Scott Davis, CTO of Embotics, discussed how automation can provide the dynamic management required to cost-effectively deliver microservices and container solutions at scale. He also discussed how flexible automation is the key to effectively bridging and seamlessly coordinating both IT and developer needs for component orchestration across disparate clouds – an increasingly important requirement at today’s multi-cloud enterprise.
DevOps at Cloud Expo, taking place October 31 - November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with 21st Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world. The widespread success of cloud computing is driving the DevOps revolution in enterprise IT. Now as never before, development teams must communicate and collaborate in a dynamic, 24/7/365 environment. There is no time to w...
API Security is complex! Vendors like Forum Systems, IBM, CA and Axway have invested almost 2 decades of engineering effort and significant capital in building API Security stacks to lockdown APIs. The API Security stack diagram shown below is a building block for rapidly locking down APIs. The four fundamental pillars of API Security - SSL, Identity, Content Validation and deployment architecture - are discussed in detail below.
IT organizations are moving to the cloud in hopes to approve efficiency, increase agility and save money. Migrating workloads might seem like a simple task, but what many businesses don’t realize is that application migration criteria differs across organizations, making it difficult for architects to arrive at an accurate TCO number. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Joe Kinsella, CTO of CloudHealth Technologies, will offer a systematic approach to understanding the TCO of a cloud application...
API Security has finally entered our security zeitgeist. OWASP Top 10 2017 - RC1 recognized API Security as a first class citizen by adding it as number 10, or A-10 on its list of web application vulnerabilities. We believe this is just the start. The attack surface area offered by API is orders or magnitude larger than any other attack surface area. Consider the fact the APIs expose cloud services, internal databases, application and even legacy mainframes over the internet. What could go wrong...
Cloud adoption is often driven by a desire to increase efficiency, boost agility and save money. All too often, however, the reality involves unpredictable cost spikes and lack of oversight due to resource limitations. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Joe Kinsella, CTO and Founder of CloudHealth Technologies, tackled the question: “How do you build a fully optimized cloud?” He will examine: Why TCO is critical to achieving cloud success – and why attendees should be thinking holistically ab...
Web services have taken the development world by storm, especially in recent years as they've become more and more widely adopted. There are naturally many reasons for this, but first, let's understand what exactly a web service is. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) defines "web of services" as "message-based design frequently found on the Web and in enterprise software". Basically, a web service is a method of sending a message between two devices through a network. In practical terms, this ...
Docker is on a roll. In the last few years, this container management service has become immensely popular in development, especially given the great fit with agile-based projects and continuous delivery. In this article, I want to take a brief look at how you can use Docker to accelerate and streamline the software development lifecycle (SDLC) process.
The goal of Continuous Testing is to shift testing left to find defects earlier and release software faster. This can be achieved by integrating a set of open source functional and performance testing tools in the early stages of your software delivery lifecycle. There is one process that binds all application delivery stages together into one well-orchestrated machine: Continuous Testing. Continuous Testing is the conveyer belt between the Software Factory and production stages. Artifacts are m...
We define Hybrid IT as a management approach in which organizations create a workload-centric and value-driven integrated technology stack that may include legacy infrastructure, web-scale architectures, private cloud implementations along with public cloud platforms ranging from Infrastructure-as-a-Service to Software-as-a-Service.
In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Kelly Looney, director of DevOps consulting for Skytap, showed how an incremental approach to introducing containers into complex, distributed applications results in modernization with less risk and more reward. He also shared the story of how Skytap used Docker to get out of the business of managing infrastructure, and into the business of delivering innovation and business value. Attendees learned how up-front planning allows for a clean sep...
In IT, we sometimes coin terms for things before we know exactly what they are and how they’ll be used. The resulting terms may capture a common set of aspirations and goals – as “cloud” did broadly for on-demand, self-service, and flexible computing. But such a term can also lump together diverse and even competing practices, technologies, and priorities to the point where important distinctions are glossed over and lost.
Enterprise architects are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies as they seek to utilize existing data center assets, leverage the advantages of cloud computing and avoid cloud vendor lock-in. This requires a globally aware traffic management strategy that can monitor infrastructure health across data centers and end-user experience globally, while responding to control changes and system specification at the speed of today’s DevOps teams. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Gray, Chie...