Welcome!

Microservices Expo Authors: Pat Romanski, Elizabeth White, Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Zakia Bouachraoui

Related Topics: Microservices Expo

Microservices Expo: Article

XML Binding Frameworks in the Context of Service-Oriented Architecture

Make an informed choice about a binding framework for your SOA needs

XMLBeans (http://xmlbeans.apache.org): XMLBeans uses XML Schema to compile to Java interfaces and classes that allow modification of XML instance data. XMLBeans provides setter and getter methods like JavaBeans. XMLBeans distinguishes itself by fully supporting XML Schema. During demarshalling an XML instance the full XML infoset is kept and is available to the developer. This is critical because a subset of XML is not easily represented in Java, e.g., the order of elements or comments might be needed in an application.

JAXB (www.java.sun.com/xml/jaxb): JAXB is a standard for XML binding and consists of two parts. First, JAXB contains a compiler that reads a schema and produces the equivalent Java object model. This generated object model captures the structure of XML better than general-purpose APIs like DOM or SAX, making it a lot easier to manipulate XML content.

The second part is an API, through which applications communicate with generated code. The JAXB implementation from SUN JWSDP1.5 is used.

Quantitative Evaluation of the Frameworks
We have quantitatively evaluated the XML binding frameworks on the following parameters.

  1. Marshalling Time - Marshalling is the process of generating an XML representation for an object in memory. As with Java object serialization, the representation needs to include all dependent objects: objects referenced by our main object, objects referenced by those objects, and so on.
  2. Demarshalling Time - Demarshalling is the reverse process of marshalling; it builds an object (and potentially a graph of linked objects) in memory from an XML representation.
  3. Memory Load - JVM Heap memory used for the whole process of marshalling and demarshalling using the respective XML binding frameworks.
Performance Tests
The test run used three samples of XML varied by its nature (segmentation factor). The test cases had to execute the selected binding frameworks on the sample XML files serially some x number of times. In addition to these, x number of threads have been executed concurrently. The combination of these test scenarios is an indicator of the memory load on a platform and time statistics of each of these utilities (see Table 1).

Test Suite
The JProbe profiler and Memory Debugger have been used to capture the performance, memory, and threading coverage issues of the respective binding frameworks. Each test case is run as a stand-alone session to have snapshots of the performance captured for each program execution. The tests are performed on a system with the following configuration:

  • Pentium IV 1.8 GHz
  • 512 MB RAM
  • Virtual Memory: 768 MB
Quantitative Results
Marshalling Time

The graphs in Figures 4.1-4.4 represent the marshalling performance for simple and complex XML respectively. Higher performance from JiBX is due to the byte code enhancement done at the compile time. It avoids introspection at runtime.

As seen from Figures 4.3 and 4.4, for multiple concurrent threads the results for XMLBeans worsen, whereas JiBX on the other hand has the same pattern.

Demarshalling Time
Refer to Figures 4.5 and Fig 4.6. Castor provides good support for data binding using code generation, but demarshalling performance is weak compared to others. The graph pattern is similar in the case of concurrent runs.

Castor uses the SAX2 parser and parses the XML file in an event-driven manner, thus reducing its speed and performance as compared to JiBX.

JiBX uses XMLPull parsing technique, unlike the push parsing techniques such as SAX. Instead of the parser calling methods in the handler to report document components, one calls the parser to get each component in turn.

Memory Load
Memory load over the entire run (composed of demarshalling marshalling) is low for JiBX as it uses the XMLPull parsing technique during demarshalling, which doesn't require the parser to maintain the state in the document. Castor uses the SAX2 parser, which requires the parser to maintain the state in the document. JAXB is relatively inefficient in terms of memory usage.

Inferences
From the performance analysis of the four data-binding frameworks, a SWOT analysis is presented in Figure 5. Based on information from Figure 5 and from the performance charts seen earlier, JiBX outperforms all of the other binding frameworks by a wide margin on both time and memory usage. JAXB scores well on marshalling and demarshalling time, but its memory usage is higher than the others. XMLBeans has a major performance hit but is more memory-efficient than Castor and JAXB. Depending on the specific requirement of an application, a suitable XML binding framework can be chosen.

Summary
We have illustrated in this article the pivotal role XML binding frameworks can play in context of SOA. To enable practitioners to make an informed choice about the appropriate XML binding platform, we have carried out a detailed quantitative analysis of some of the popular XML binding frameworks in the J2EE context, and presented the results.

References

More Stories By Dr. Srinivas Padmanabhuni

Dr. Srinivas Padmanabhuni is a principal researcher with the Web Services Centre of Excellence in SETLabs, Infosys Technologies, and specializes in Web Services, service-oriented architecture, and grid technologies alongside pursuing interests in Semantic Web, intelligent agents, and enterprise architecture. He has authored several papers in international conferences. Dr. Padmanabhuni holds a PhD degree in computing science from University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

More Stories By Bijoy Majumdar

Bijoy Majumdar is a member of the Web Services COE (Center of Excellence) for Infosys Technologies, a global IT consulting firm, and has substantial experience in publishing papers, presenting papers at conferences, and defining standards for SOA and Web services. Prior to Infosys, Bijoy Majumdar worked as an IT Analyst, and had been a member of the GE Center of Excellence (e-center) under the E-Business Practice of Tata Consultancy Services.

More Stories By Ujval Mysore

Ujval Mysore is a member of the Web Services COE (Center of Excellence) for Infosys Tehcnologies, a global IT consulting firm, and have substantial experience in publishing papers, presenting papers at conferences, and defining standards for SOA and Web services. The Web Services COE specializes in SOA, Web services, and other related technologies. Dr. Srinivas Padmanabhuni heads the Web Services COE.

More Stories By Vikram Sitaram

Vikram Sitaram is a member of the Web Services COE (Center of Excellence) for Infosys Tehcnologies, a global IT consulting firm, and have substantial experience in publishing papers, presenting papers at conferences, and defining standards for SOA and Web services. The Web Services COE specializes in SOA, Web services, and other related technologies. Dr. Srinivas Padmanabhuni heads the Web Services COE.

Comments (2) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
tejasvi 08/12/05 12:13:44 PM EDT

this article is excellent

XML News Desk 08/02/05 04:46:17 PM EDT

XML Binding Frameworks in the Context of Service-Oriented Architecture. This article critically evaluates the role of XML binding frameworks play in the context of service-oriented architecture (SOA) platforms, and it also provides an objective evaluation of the popular XML binding frameworks in a J2EE environment.

Microservices Articles
Containers and Kubernetes allow for code portability across on-premise VMs, bare metal, or multiple cloud provider environments. Yet, despite this portability promise, developers may include configuration and application definitions that constrain or even eliminate application portability. In this session we'll describe best practices for "configuration as code" in a Kubernetes environment. We will demonstrate how a properly constructed containerized app can be deployed to both Amazon and Azure ...
Most DevOps journeys involve several phases of maturity. Research shows that the inflection point where organizations begin to see maximum value is when they implement tight integration deploying their code to their infrastructure. Success at this level is the last barrier to at-will deployment. Storage, for instance, is more capable than where we read and write data. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Atwell, a Developer Advocate for NetApp, will discuss the role and value...
Modern software design has fundamentally changed how we manage applications, causing many to turn to containers as the new virtual machine for resource management. As container adoption grows beyond stateless applications to stateful workloads, the need for persistent storage is foundational - something customers routinely cite as a top pain point. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 21st Cloud Expo, Bill Borsari, Head of Systems Engineering at Datera, explored how organizations can reap the bene...
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Scott Davis, CTO of Embotics, discussed how automation can provide the dynamic management required to cost-effectively deliver microservices and container solutions at scale. He also discussed how flexible automation is the key to effectively bridging and seamlessly coordinating both IT and developer needs for component orchestration across disparate clouds – an increasingly important requirement at today’s multi-cloud enterprise.
In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Mike Johnston, an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io, discussed how to use Kubernetes to set up a SaaS infrastructure for your business. Mike Johnston is an infrastructure engineer at Supergiant.io with over 12 years of experience designing, deploying, and maintaining server and workstation infrastructure at all scales. He has experience with brick and mortar data centers as well as cloud providers like Digital Ocean, Amazon Web Services, and Rackspace. H...
DevOpsSummit New York 2018, colocated with CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City. Digital Transformation (DX) is a major focus with the introduction of DXWorldEXPO within the program. Successful transformation requires a laser focus on being data-driven and on using all the tools available that enable transformation if they plan to survive over the long term.
CloudEXPO New York 2018, colocated with DXWorldEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City and will bring together Cloud Computing, FinTech and Blockchain, Digital Transformation, Big Data, Internet of Things, DevOps, AI, Machine Learning and WebRTC to one location.
SYS-CON Events announced today that DatacenterDynamics has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7–9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. DatacenterDynamics is a brand of DCD Group, a global B2B media and publishing company that develops products to help senior professionals in the world's most ICT dependent organizations make risk-based infrastructure and capacity decisions.
Consumer-driven contracts are an essential part of a mature microservice testing portfolio enabling independent service deployments. In this presentation we'll provide an overview of the tools, patterns and pain points we've seen when implementing contract testing in large development organizations.
Enterprise architects are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies as they seek to utilize existing data center assets, leverage the advantages of cloud computing and avoid cloud vendor lock-in. This requires a globally aware traffic management strategy that can monitor infrastructure health across data centers and end-user experience globally, while responding to control changes and system specification at the speed of today’s DevOps teams. In his session at 20th Cloud Expo, Josh Gray, Chie...